Nobody Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Due process pertains to legal protections in criminal proceedings. Neither the Colts, nor the NFL, nor the fans, are obligated to extend a presumption of innocence to anyone in any situation.Right but even if the guy is innocent he's being branded a rapist and his life would probably never be the same after this. Media can't put away a man but they can certainly ruin a life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynjin Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Due process pertains to legal protections in criminal proceedings. Neither the Colts, nor the NFL, nor the fans, are obligated to extend a presumption of innocence to anyone in any situation.No they are not obligated, but it sure would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 If he is found to be exonerated, congrats That's what I hope happens. And not just having the case thrown out due to a lack of evidence. I hope the charges are dropped, the woman retracts her accusation and admits she was lying, the prosecutors issue an apology, etc. If he didn't do anything wrong, I hope his name is cleared. And I'd gladly and happily admit how wrong I was for saying the team should release him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsBlueFL Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015  I'm digging into it. I think you posted the wrong portion, but I think you're right. Check this out:  I don't know if that's automatic, but it's definitely an option that still exists. It might be close to automatic. And correct me if I'm wrong, but the exempt list frees up the roster spot for the team, right? I think the player is lifted from active list when placed on exempt list. So yes, would open a roster spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentHill Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 i can't believe he's still on the roster.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Right but even if the guy is innocent he's being branded a rapist and his life would probably never be the same after this. Media can't put away a man but they can certainly ruin a life. No they are not obligated, but it sure would be nice. I can only speak for myself in this case. It appears that he hid this from the team for a month and a half. That's not the look of a person who is innocent. That a relatively long investigation has culminated in him being charged does not bode well for him. But as I just said, I hope he is, and I hope he's fully exonerated.  I'm just saying, public reactions are not subject to the presumption of innocence. And the team and the league can extend whatever presumptions they deem appropriate, but they are not required to. So, in response to the post earlier, all I'm saying is that it's not like his rights are being violated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 i can't believe he's still on the roster.... They can take their time and figure out what to do. No transactions are official until tomorrow afternoon, anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentHill Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 They can take their time and figure out what to do. No transactions are official until tomorrow afternoon, anyways. True, but a huge distraction none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 You and i both know there are women out there who would sleep with a guy just because he's a pro football player. That's what he meant. You may not like it, but it's true regardless.You missed the point.He claimed McNary shouldn't "have" to rape anyone since, as a football player, he can easily get sex. And you're defending him. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 #Colts just released a statement on Josh McNary saying they have no info outside of media reports. Trying to ascertain info b4 taking stance— Stephen Holder (@HolderStephen) January 14, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snkdy Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Speechless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsBlueFL Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Right but even if the guy is innocent he's being branded a rapist and his life would probably never be the same after this. Media can't put away a man but they can certainly ruin a life. He can't be prove innocent, just not guilty at this point. And his (alleged) actions are just alleged. But if he is found not guilty, it is just as good as innocence due to Double Jeopardy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 He can't be prove innocent, just not guilty at this point. And his (alleged) actions are just alleged. But if he is found not guilty, it is just as good as innocence due to Double Jeopardy.YepActually they could drop the charges and then re charge him later. Only if it goes before a trial and he found not guilty will double jeopardy come into play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulballs Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 You missed the point.He claimed McNary shouldn't "have" to rape anyone since, as a football player, he can easily get sex. And you're defending him. Unbelievable.Maybe he didn't word it in the best way, but the point is valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Actually they could drop the charges and then re charge him later. Only if it goes before a trial and he found not guilty will double jeopardy come into play. Only with new evidence though, right? I mean, at that point, it's hard not to form an opinion about the situation, you know? That's why the presumption of innocence only applies to how he's treated by the legal system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snkdy Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Maybe he didn't word it in the best way, but the point is valid. No it isn't. Rape is not about sex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Maybe he didn't word it in the best way, but the point is valid. There are some really reckless implications in that kind of comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Maybe he didn't word it in the best way, but the point is valid.No, it's not. It's completely ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudeski Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Exactly why you shouldn't have said that because most are and I take a very prejudicial offense to your comment !women are raped in the military all the time. Let's get real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Only with new evidence though, right?I mean, at that point, it's hard not to form an opinion about the situation, you know? That's why the presumption of innocence only applies to how he's treated by the legal system.Correct. Let's say for sake of argument, it's he said she said, no forensic evidence and her story is full of holes, they may drop the charges which allows them time to find any potential witnesses or even other evidence or they can't find anything and they drop it. Now fast forward 6 months and suddenly a cell phone video pops up of him drugging her drink or something along those lines. They can recharge him and throw in more charges. Again, this is a made up scenario and just an example. There's other reasons they can do it as well. Granted I'm not an attorney and just know the law from what I've seen while on the investigation side of things. Plus military law is a tad different than civilian law. But concepts are very similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 women are raped in the military all the time. Let's get realUnfortunately you are correct. And a rising number of men are being raped and cohersed into sexual situations more and more as well. I wish we could do more to stop it but we do have our bad apples as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcEWoLF Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 If this is confirmed then its truly sad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougDew Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Parrot. Parrot. Parrot. Parrot. Why can't everybody just parrot what they've been taught to parrot? It would send a loud and glorious message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I'll reserve comment till it plays out. Supposed to be innocent UNTIL proven innocent. If indeed true, he needs a one way ticket to Michigan city Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Parrot. Parrot. Parrot. Parrot. Why can't everybody just parrot what they've been taught to parrot? It would send a loud and glorious message. That message would be "DON'T FREAKING RAPE PEOPLE!"  Can't have that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougDew Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 That message would be "DON'T FREAKING RAPE PEOPLE!"Â Â Can't have that, right? Rape is bad. Military is good. Don't really know if Josh is bad...or good. That sums up the first 4 pages of the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Correct. Let's say for sake of argument, it's he said she said, no forensic evidence and her story is full of holes, they may drop the charges which allows them time to find any potential witnesses or even other evidence or they can't find anything and they drop it. Now fast forward 6 months and suddenly a cell phone video pops up of him drugging her drink or something along those lines. They can recharge him and throw in more charges.Again, this is a made up scenario and just an example. There's other reasons they can do it as well. Granted I'm not an attorney and just know the law from what I've seen while on the investigation side of things. Plus military law is a tad different than civilian law. But concepts are very similar. Taking your made up scenario, it's hard to see how anything unfair would have happened to McNary in that case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Rape is bad. Military is good. Don't really know if Josh is bad...or good.That sums up the first 4 pages of the thread. It's hard to understand what the beef is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrincetonTiger Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Not sure what to think yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollerColt Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 4 pages later, and I think I've finally figured out how I feel: extremely disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Kirk Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 women are raped in the military all the time. Let's get realYes they are but does that mean most military personell are law breakers ? Lets get real , I had the priviledge  of guarding those folks In a Marine Prison before they were sent on to Leavenworth , to insinuate most Service men are like this or women are lawbreakers is wrong that's whats real ! Respect Servicemen and Vets ! If you think in someway im defending JM your sadly mistaken. It probably is much less per capata than general public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsBlueFL Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 This instagram pick from 3 days ago is disturbing-Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrincetonTiger Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 This instagram pick from 3 days ago is disturbing-Â Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Has anyone else taken the time to read the police report, all 15 pages.... as someone who's trained in investigations, I must first commend the detective for a very thorough job.However, 2 things pop out at me.1st. Mc Nary is said to have preserved all the bedding and clothing in question.2nd. This 2nd white male thats listed in the report as being present during this time. His occupation stands out to me. A Talent casting agent. Now I'm going to speculate but I am looking this agency up to see what type of talent they deal with. It could be he was trying to coherse her with some acting or modeling career or it could be this man is a porn producer and they tried to get her to have sex for that reason. Either way, the presence of a talent agent is intriguing to me and I'd want dig deeper into that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Yes they are but does that mean most military personell are law breakers ? Lets get real , I had the priviledge  of guarding those folks In a Marine Prison before they were sent on to Leavenworth , to insinuate most Service men are like this or women are lawbreakers is wrong that's whats real ! Respect Servicemen and Vets ! If you think in someway im defending JM your sadly mistaken. It probably is much less per capata than general public. To the bolded, of course not. And no one said that. I understand that you didn't like the sloppy insinuation that was made. I don't blame you there. But no one really suggested anything about most military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 1st. Mc Nary is said to have preserved all the bedding and clothing in question.  That probably works in his favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatOneColtFan Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 This is terrible.Out of nowhere too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Rape is bad. Military is good. Don't really know if Josh is bad...or good.That sums up the first 4 pages of the thread.Did you have anything to add or did you just feel like being an *? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrincetonTiger Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Has anyone else taken the time to read the police report, all 15 pages.... as someone who's trained in investigations, I must first commend the detective for a very thorough job.However, 2 things pop out at me.1st. Mc Nary is said to have preserved all the bedding and clothing in question.2nd. This 2nd white male thats listed in the report as being present during this time. His occupation stands out to me. A Talent casting agent. Now I'm going to speculate but I am looking this agency up to see what type of talent they deal with. It could be he was trying to coherse her with some acting or modeling career or it could be this man is a porn producer and they tried to get her to have sex for that reason. Either way, the presence of a talent agent is intriguing to me and I'd want dig deeper into that.Very Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csmopar Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 That probably works in his favor.Yes and no. Depending of how good the lawyers are and how they spin it. But it may give him a defense point or two. I'm thinking the key is the 2nd man in the report. Who is he and what role did he play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now