Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

biggest needs on front seven


OLD FAN MAN

Recommended Posts

I dunno, but a guy off the scrap heap like Pendleton plays better than Montori (our next Haloti Ngata according to the exagerating Coach Chuck)...Pagano overstates his players' abilities so much he has compromised his credibility....I just laugh at Pagano 's hyperboles now...he is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, but a guy off the scrap heap like Pendleton plays better than Montori (our next Haloti Ngata according to the exagerating Coach Chuck)...Pagano overstates his players' abilities so much he has compromised his credibility....I just laugh at Pagano 's hyperboles now...he is a joke.

they were playing different positions for the most part
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always build a defense from the inside out. RJF and Redding shouldn't be starters. Redding only because of age and wear and tear on body, RJF no comment. Chapman is still young so i think he'll end up being the starter. 

 

1. DE - 2014 draft pick, Daquan Jones or Kelcy Quarles 

2. DE - Arthur Jones or Montari Hughes improves

3. ILB - 2014 draft pick 

4. CB - 2014 draft pick 

5. FS - 2014 draft pick 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, but a guy off the scrap heap like Pendleton plays better than Montori (our next Haloti Ngata according to the exagerating Coach Chuck)...Pagano overstates his players' abilities so much he has compromised his credibility....I just laugh at Pagano 's hyperboles now...he is a joke.

 

How are Pagano's hyperboles worse than yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need 2 DE's, 1OLB, 1ILB, 1 CB and 2 safeties. I factored in age when making my assessment. Elite needs are a DE, OLB/ILB and CB. Backups and a few project/develop players for other needs

 

A football guy! You get it where FEW here do.

These people are ok with some of these total duds. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it sounds like it at times. He clearly plays inferior players for no reason

I totally agree, how does Shepard keep starting over Conner, every time Conner comes in the game he seems to make a play.Same goes for Angerer , I rather play Mcnary or Studabaker instead of Angerer.If u want a slow linebacker bring in Brandon Spikes, at least he can tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree, how does Shepard keep starting over Conner, every time Conner comes in the game he seems to make a play.Same goes for Angerer , I rather play Mcnary or Studabaker instead of Angerer.If u want a slow linebacker bring in Brandon Spikes, at least he can tackle.

I'm guessing it's because Conner played poorly every time he was in the game and was a liability in both pass coverage and against the run.  And because, looking at all 16 games Angerer graded out as the 4th best LB for the Colts and if you look at it on a per game played (because he missed five games) Angerer was the 3rd best LB per game (behind Mathis and Freeman).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing it's because Conner played poorly every time he was in the game and was a liability in both pass coverage and against the run. And because, looking at all 16 games Angerer graded out as the 4th best LB for the Colts and if you look at it on a per game played (because he missed five games) Angerer was the 3rd best LB per game (behind Mathis and Freeman).

that is one jacked up grading system
Link to comment
Share on other sites

which proves me correct.

Right?

While you're arguments are consistent they lack completeness. That is to say we don't have the full information that Pagano does. As you yourself it would illogical for him to pick players of they're worse than those left on the bench so there must be reasons we are not privy too. Rightly or wrongly I'm sure there is a reason, but as we don't know what it is we're just second guessing here.

I.e without the full information a logical argument can be proved neither valid or invalid. Or ... We can armchair GM all we want but it ain't worth spit :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1-a run-stopping D lineman--one for now, but need 2-the current group just didn't get it done despite 2 free agents coming in

2-ILB-Freeman is solid at one ILB, but we need the other to be a run-stopper as well

3-OLB-I just don't see Werner being more than servicable, but he is so young i will give him a chance. I see his best years at 6-8 sacks. I think we need more, espcially to replace Mathis as he ages

4-cover safety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Love the addition of Latu. I wanted him and/or the corner who is blazing fast and a man corner (cannot remember his name). I never thought Ballard would pick either because of the injury history for Latu and the other not a zone corner. In reality, the D could be a lot better this year than last. However it may not be reflected in the stats because they play some very good qb's this year. Last year, the D faced horrible qb play and what is alarming is that they actually put up stats near the bottom.  That being said, I cannot see the D being worse than last year if that is comforting, lol?? 
    • We’ll see if it remains average this year.  I think it’s possible, but unlikely.   Put another way,  if the Colts defense is average in 2024 I will be very, Very, VERY disappointed. 
    • I agree with you that he is not trying to build an average defense. It is just a plain fact that after 8 yeas of drafting and free agency, he has managed to do it.
    • Kind of an extreme example, but Jim Irsay specifically praising Bryce Young last year could qualify. In general though, if a team is trying to throw off the scent by floating positive information about other players, that seems harmless. It's different if a team is trashing a player to try to get him to drop into their range, and I don't think that's something that actually happens. If it did, I think that would be highly inappropriate, and I think a good reporter would look back and recognize that their source was using them, and think twice about trusting that source again.     So I think this is way more common than what McGinn did. And I don't think people ignore it, unless it's something they don't want to hear. Most sports reports include some version of 'I've been told...' without naming or directly quoting a source. A lot of those are just fact-based, black/white reports, but that often happens with more opinion-based or viewpoint-based reporting as well.     I don't know if anyone necessarily likes those reports, but I do think we consume them, and are generally influenced by them. Yeah, the substantiated/analytical stuff is way more valuable than a report discussion a potential character issue, but if it has a legitimate foundation -- AD Mitchell does have diabetes, it can be difficult for someone with that condition to control their mood and energy levels -- then I think it should be considered. Ultimately, I know the quality of information I have access to is nowhere near what the teams are getting, so I don't worry too much about it.      Yeah, I fully agree. Ballard faced the media when the Okereke story came out, and it was obvious the team had done their homework. He was firm when asked about Ogletree coming back. The Colts are thorough. Doesn't mean nothing can go wrong once they draft the guy, but I'm confident they've checked all their boxes.    And definitely, I think Ballard 100% meant everything he said, and I have no problem with him saying it. But, I think there's a difference between McGinn's report, and the narrative that came later. I think the report was based on anonymous insights, and the narrative was based on sensational headlines. And I'd say Ballard's comments apply more to the narrative than to the report.
  • Members

    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,523

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,979

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,890

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,983

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dickerson29

      Dickerson29 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,675

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,213

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheEdgeis1

      TheEdgeis1 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crush22

      Crush22 488

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...