Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

MJD to Test Free Agency

HarassedOffTheSite

By HarassedOffTheSite
in NFL General

 Share

Recommended Posts

chad72 Ring of Honor

chad72

Posted
Posted

I think it will be the Rams. Jeff Fisher loves to run the ball, has seen MJD up close in the AFC South division for years and would love to have him backing up Zac Stacy.

 

If Jack Del Rio gets a job somewhere other than the Vikings (maybe Browns), he will bring MJD there.

 

Heck, if Donald Brown leaves, we might be in play for MJD's services too :).

 

Browns seem to be the best fit however overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bap1331 Walk On

bap1331

Posted
Posted

I would of loved MJD a few years ago but I'm honestly happy with Ballard,Brown and Richardson.

Guarantee the Patriots take a look.

Gotta agree. Patriots would pick them up. MJD doesn't have much left and I'm sure he wants a chance at the championship..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoPats Practice Squad

GoPats

Posted
Posted

I don't think the Patriots are going to be in a position cap-wise to add many high profile FAs this offseason. They've also got Blount, Ridley, Vereen, Bolden... pretty loaded at the position right now. 

 

I wouldn't even venture to guess, given the market for RBs the past couple of seasons combined with MJD's age and injury history, what he'll get on the market.

 

In all honesty, I see better fits for him anyway. The Jets, the Giants, Miami, Houston maybe (if Tate is gone and Foster isn't 100%), Cleveland, Carolina, Arizona... lots of teams could use an upgrade at RB that MJD would bring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Superman Active Roster

Dark Superman

Posted
Posted

That has nothing to do with what I said. If I had a nickel for every player this forum predicted the Patriots would sign I would be quite wealthy.

I was being sarcastic.

But Belicheck seems to get the best out of players ..

Welker, Moss etc..

I could see him playing for the Patriots..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VikingsFanInChennai
      Harrison Butker's shocking speech, Chiefs probably not going to 3 peat

      By VikingsFanInChennai · Posted

      I think you understood his words in a "positive" way, but that's not what he said.   He DID NOT say that "most of you would choose to get married..."   That's your implication. Of course, only women can bring children in this world and most of the women will choose to be married and have children, but that's not exactly what he said.   He said, "doing so - while some others will go on to lead successful career in the world - will take you closer to God's Will"    Here's what he said from the transcript:    He could've said, "even if you go on to have a very successful career, and get the greatest accolades of the world, I think the most important title of a woman is :  Homemaker. And, that would take you closer to God's Will"    But, he didn't say so because he wanted to say exactly what he believes women should do and brought God into that by saying that's His Will.    I think he made a mistake of implying that women are generally excited about marriage and having kids and being a homemaker, when that's only part of a woman's life - even though that could be the most cherished and blessed part of the life.   He only looked at how that made his wife's life - his words, not his wife's words by the way - and projected that to all the women. 
    • stitches
      AD Mitchell Not Signed

      By stitches · Posted

      This happens every single year and every single year people worry about the occasional unsigned rookie when we haven't even gotten into June yet.   Guys/gals... it's really a big nothing burger. Ever since the NFL introduced rookie scale contracts this has been a non-issue. Everything important in those contracts has been made non-negotiable. The negotiable things are largely minutiae - it's about schedule of payment...it's about off-set language, or language about voiding salary payments(for example - can the team void payments for suspensions and stuff like that), etc.   There are two cases I remember in the last 10 years where this has become a problem and the player has actually missed training camp practices because of it - Joey Bosa(because of schedule of payments dispute) and Roquan Smith(because of dispute about the language about voiding payments for suspensions because of play). And as you see... Both of those were top 10 picks. (i.e. more money on the line)...   Holdouts/holdins of day 2 and day 3 picks are pretty much unheard of. I personally couldn't find a single case when I looked for it.    AD seems to be taking part in both rookie mini camp and in OTAs and hasn't missed any practice, we haven't heard about any sort of dispute so far, so my assumption would be there is nothing to see here and it's all formality.    So yeah... Unless we hear there is a problem I would just assume everything is good.    
    • CR91
      Colts OTAs Thread May 21st-23rd; May 29th-31st

      By CR91 · Posted

      I was referring to the images on the colts website 
    • 2006Coltsbestever
      AD Mitchell Not Signed

      By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted

    • NewColtsFan
      Colts OTAs Thread May 21st-23rd; May 29th-31st

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      Said to be 6’1” and 235.    Good size but not exactly huge.   

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...