Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Union tells players test is coming for HGH


Warhorse

Recommended Posts

Over/under - 115 players busted in the first 4 weeks.

They can only test 5 players on 8 teams a week....so that would ONLY be 160 tests....that is probably a little high....and it is supposedly random....*yeah right*. Trust me they won't catch that many. There will be a few sacrificial lambs that they know are cheating and try to scare the rest straight. I imagine it will be closer to 20.

 

I am just excited they are actually going to make an effort to clean up the game. This is the first sign that they are actually committed to player health...which I know mostly it is for show. Considering how bad the issue is in MLB...there is no doubt in my mind the NFL is basically a bunch of lab rats with what most guys are using. You can't have the explosion in size and speed and have injuries and concussions going through the roof and it not have any correlation. There are going to be a lot of unhappy fans around the league I imagine when some of their favorite stars have to sit....including us...I imagine however the media will cover it differently though....taking the players side as that the playing career is so short...and the NFL pressures them...and so on as to blaming these guys for doing it....just waiting for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have been saying "it's coming" forever.....I will believe it when it actually happens. Players are probably prepared for it anyway....just be sure to keep your testosterone levels under 10x of what's normal.

It was a part of the collective bargaining agreement....it was a detail they said would be worked out later.....over 2 years later now lol....how convienent!!!  I think it is coming...but I'm not sure if either side is going to really make it an issue or utilize it how it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a joke. And I'm not just talking about the ridiculously short testing window the testing provides, either. (one can use for dinner, test negative by breakfast).

 

Here's what you need to know: The NFL isn't suspending anyone for HGH this year. The testing being done is a population study being performed in order to determine "normal" baseline levels in the future. 

 

Why do I use the quotation marks? Because players know that by using HGH right before the study, they can skew the baseline numbers to be artificially high so that none of them will test positive in the future. With no risk whatsoever of being suspended for HGH during this study, there's even less motivation for players not to use than ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can only test 5 players on 8 teams a week....so that would ONLY be 160 tests....that is probably a little high....and it is supposedly random....*yeah right*. Trust me they won't catch that many. There will be a few sacrificial lambs that they know are cheating and try to scare the rest straight. I imagine it will be closer to 20.

 

I am just excited they are actually going to make an effort to clean up the game. This is the first sign that they are actually committed to player health...which I know mostly it is for show. Considering how bad the issue is in MLB...there is no doubt in my mind the NFL is basically a bunch of lab rats with what most guys are using. You can't have the explosion in size and speed and have injuries and concussions going through the roof and it not have any correlation. There are going to be a lot of unhappy fans around the league I imagine when some of their favorite stars have to sit....including us...I imagine however the media will cover it differently though....taking the players side as that the playing career is so short...and the NFL pressures them...and so on as to blaming these guys for doing it....just waiting for it.

I'm with you.  I honestly don't know how many people will get busted and I thought the same thing you did regarding the "random" part of the testing.  But it's not like I want people to go down in flames over this HGH testing.  It'll happen to some, sure.  Hope its not any of our guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this at first too, until I read the full agreement.  I found this-

 

{click on each to enlarge}

 

HGH1_zpsb46b288a.jpg

 

And also saw this-

 

HGH2_zps6445b029.jpg

 

Finally this-

 

HGH3_zpsd08a145c.jpg

 

So I think it does include real punitive measure this year.  We shall see.

 

The most important line is "After the decision limit is established". There is a lot of leeway in how that limit is determined for the NFL, as they decided that WADA's  method was unreliable. In essence, they can make the decision limit whatever they want. And I don't trust for a second that, if the limit they determine indicates widespread HGH use, the owners won't simply raise it in order to come in under that 5% threshold (meaning that 144 players or less can test positive with no names being linked to samples). They're not going to harm their business by admitting to a flood of PED use- they're too good at PR for that.

 

And, finally, check out the way it's worded. Nobody's getting suspended for anything that comes from the population study. The only way they can get suspended is if they test positive during random testing, which is nearly impossible to catch HGH use from anyways.

 

I've got my issues with Foxnews, but here's an article they get right about the perception of the move: http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2013/07/24/extra-points-hgh-testing-is-red-herring/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why anyone would be against this.  Can someone shed light as to why it is taking so long to implement?

Ask DeMaurice smith.  In all honesty a good percentage of every teams defense is OBVIOUSLY on HGH. I don't know why the head players rep is against an even playing field.  He's also against pads in the pants so I honestly think he likes fighting with Goodell rather than getting anything accomplished. 

 

Starting to feel like MLB all over again.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the influence PED use in professional sports has on the younger generations I really could not care less about PEDs in professional sports.  

 

To me unless they make the first failed test an automatic year long suspension and the second failed test a life time ban there is no real point to it because players will continue to do it.  You have to make the punishment so severe that it will outweigh the potential gain for taking it.  Players are not taking it because it is fun.  They are taking it to get a leg up on the competition to get more money.  Unless you make them think well if test positive I'm done for the season/life time ban they will continue to do it because the reward will outweigh the risk.

 

I also do not want to hear fans start whining about players taking longer to recover from injury as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think I was wrong in my guess here. On later inspection, it seems like the more likely situation is that the part about his diabetes is still in this article, but it's just hidden behind a paywall.. 
    • That could have happened. Could have been a HIPAA issue too.   But I think the fact that these other quotes existed (even if they were put in later) adds necessary context to this situation. It wasn't just AD being the victim of some smear campaign that somehow heavily influenced NFL teams...as seems to be the narrative. Instead, there were also concerns among different scouts (assuming it wasn't one scout) about other aspects, including his Combine workout.   So we know what some thought...and we know what happened. 10 teams drafted WRs before AD. Yes, 3 of those WRs were going earlier than him no matter what, but 7 other WR-needy teams opted for other WRs. And even Ballard actually traded down with him on the board. It seems fairly safe to assume that NFL teams didn't have him as a R1 WR, or top 5 at the position, for reasons beyond a couple comments from anonymous scouts. 
    • Cardinals need to sweep the Marlins in their 3 game series.  At minimum win 2/3.   It's a chance they cannot mess up.
    • Honestly, isn't that kind of a base level journalistic integrity and ethics? I don't think he's setting up some arbitrary litmus test. I'm no journalist and have no idea what the professional standard is, but this to me seems like a pretty reasonable standard - if you are writing about someone and a source is sharing pretty disparaging information that might affect the subject to the tune of millions of dollars, the least you should probably do is to ask for comment from said subject, before you print that information.
    • Kind of seems like you're setting up a litmus test for whether a reporter is "good" or not based on whether they do this thing you don't like. So maybe you could share some well-respected media in your opinion -- sports would be most relevant -- and then we could share some examples.    I agree that the best practice would be to reach out to the subject for a response. But if the subject declines or doesn't acknowledge the request, now what? Add a line saying 'subject declined to respond,' and now the unnamed sources are viewed with more legitimacy? 
  • Members

    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,219

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 88

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,694

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 609

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,478

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,976

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 1,002

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • All Outta Luck

      All Outta Luck 4

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,524

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,408

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...