Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NFL teams confirmed meetings with players at the combine.


Recommended Posts

Very Interesting... So the Colts interview(ed):

Corey Fuller, WR, Virginia Tech (EW)

Ray Graham, RB, Pittsburgh (EW)

Lane Johnson, OL, Oklahoma (COM) (SR) (INT)

Luke Marquardt, OL, Azusa Pacific (COM)

Vance McDonald, TE, Rice (SR)

Ty Powell, LB, Harding (SR)

Shamarko Thomas, S, Syracuse (EW)

Earl Watford, OL, James Madison (EW)

Sylvester Williams, DL, North Carolina (SR)

I have to admit, I'm surprised our list isn't larger and more diverse specifically with corners. I'm not sure how much value to place on this as an indication of our intentions outside of Lane Johnson and the O linemen. Thanks for sharing, it is very interesting. I would have thought our combine interviewees would have been longer, given that it's in Indy. Baltimore seems to be interviewing a ton!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very Interesting... So the Colts interview(ed):

Corey Fuller, WR, Virginia Tech (EW)

Ray Graham, RB, Pittsburgh (EW)

Lane Johnson, OL, Oklahoma (COM) (SR) (INT)

Luke Marquardt, OL, Azusa Pacific (COM)

Vance McDonald, TE, Rice (SR)

Ty Powell, LB, Harding (SR)

Shamarko Thomas, S, Syracuse (EW)

Earl Watford, OL, James Madison (EW)

Sylvester Williams, DL, North Carolina (SR)

I have to admit, I'm surprised our list isn't larger and more diverse specifically with corners. I'm not sure how much value to place on this as an indication of our intentions outside of Lane Johnson and the O linemen. Thanks for sharing, it is very interesting. I would have thought our combine interviewees would have been longer, given that it's in Indy. Baltimore seems to be interviewing a ton!

Yeah, really, me too. Who knows? Maybe the Colts see more value in these guys, of are getting to the rest later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This means absolutely nothing. Teams will meet with most players at the combine at some point in time, but much of it is nothing more than a courtesy. Teams will also meet with players they have no intention of picking just to throw off other teams and sometimes they won't meet at all with the players they really like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This means absolutely nothing. Teams will meet with most players at the combine at some point in time, but much of it is nothing more than a courtesy. Teams will also meet with players they have no intention of picking just to throw off other teams and sometimes they won't meet at all with the players they really like.

 

Actually.....    I don't believe any of that is true...    I think each team is allotted a certain number of interviews that you're allowed.  I thought the number was 20.    But, if these lists are to be believed, it's higher.  Because both Baltimore and Philadelphia are reported to have interviewed more than 30 kids each.   No other team was nearly that high.    Strange.

 

But the NFL does try to make sure players don't have to do too many interviews.  Maybe that's the number 20 I'm thinking of.   Also,  each interview is 15 minutes long.    These interviews are not courtesy's...   nor are they smoke screens....

 

As to the colts' list....   my guess is it's not a complete list.   That it may be a partial list.    That's my hunch.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually.....    I don't believe any of that is true...    I think each team is allotted a certain number of interviews that you're allowed.  I thought the number was 20.    But, if these lists are to be believed, it's higher.  Because both Baltimore and Philadelphia are reported to have interviewed more than 30 kids each.   No other team was nearly that high.    Strange.

 

But the NFL does try to make sure players don't have to do too many interviews.  Maybe that's the number 20 I'm thinking of.   Also,  each interview is 15 minutes long.    These interviews are not courtesy's...   nor are they smoke screens....

 

As to the colts' list....   my guess is it's not a complete list.   That it may be a partial list.    That's my hunch.....

 

 

 

Mike Mayock said today basically what I said. Teams will talk to almost every player just as a courtesy or often just to get to know the kid. Many of the interviews held at the combine are just to throw other teams off or to make other teams think you're interested in drafting a certain position. Teams do not have limitations on how many players they can talk too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been Colt drafted players who have said that being taken by the Colts came as a complete shock as they were never spoken to by the team. My guess is players that they have questions on are more likely to get talked to. Guys they have as "cant miss players" are not a "need" interview.....just my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Mayock said today basically what I said. Teams will talk to almost every player just as a courtesy or often just to get to know the kid. Many of the interviews held at the combine are just to throw other teams off or to make other teams think you're interested in drafting a certain position. Teams do not have limitations on how many players they can talk too.

This is absolutely false. Teams don't talk to over 300 guys and there is 100% a limit on how many are done. It's either 40 or 60 I think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually.....    I don't believe any of that is true...    I think each team is allotted a certain number of interviews that you're allowed.  I thought the number was 20.    But, if these lists are to be believed, it's higher.  Because both Baltimore and Philadelphia are reported to have interviewed more than 30 kids each.   No other team was nearly that high.    Strange.

 

But the NFL does try to make sure players don't have to do too many interviews.  Maybe that's the number 20 I'm thinking of.   Also,  each interview is 15 minutes long.    These interviews are not courtesy's...   nor are they smoke screens....

 

As to the colts' list....   my guess is it's not a complete list.   That it may be a partial list.    That's my hunch.....

Those lists are just what has been confirmed so far and the vast majority of them are from the senior bowl and other events. That list isn't a combine list.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is absolutely false. Teams don't talk to over 300 guys and there is 100% a limit on how many are done. It's either 40 or 60 I think.

 

 

 

Show me a link where it says there is a limit. I think I'll take Mayock's word for it over yours considering the guy works the combine every yr.. Don't believe it you want, I personally couldn't care less and your assumption that my statement is "absolutely false" needs to be backed up with some evidence to the contrary. Considering Balt. has already spoken to 36 players with 2 days left in the combine, I find it hard to believe they have almost reached their limit. I'm not saying that teams will sit down and interview all 333 players, Thats absurd, but they will speak to a big majority of any players they want to get a feel for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Mayock said today basically what I said. Teams will talk to almost every player just as a courtesy or often just to get to know the kid. Many of the interviews held at the combine are just to throw other teams off or to make other teams think you're interested in drafting a certain position. Teams do not have limitations on how many players they can talk too.

 

I think teams will talk to as many players as they can over the course of months.   Each team couldn't possibly come close to meeting with 333 players (the number invited to the combine)....    the time demands alone would make it literally impossible.

 

If I'm off the on the number -- fine -- but meeting with all players is not correct.   If I find something, of course, I'll link it....   but short of that,  I think common sense says teams meeting with hundreds of players is simply not happening....   not at the 6-day combine at least....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think teams will talk to as many players as they can over the course of months.   Each team couldn't possibly come close to meeting with 333 players (the number invited to the combine)....    the time demands alone would make it literally impossible.

 

If I'm off the on the number -- fine -- but meeting with all players is not correct.   If I find something, of course, I'll link it....   but short of that,  I think common sense says teams meeting with hundreds of players is simply not happening....   not at the 6 day combine at least....

 

 

 

I guess I did overstate it that they would talk to almost every player. what I meant was they'll talk to as many players as they want even those players they no intention of taking. Your right, there is no way they would talk to all 333 players, but if a team has needs at 6 or 7 different positions, they'll probably talk to just about every available player at those positions to get a feel for who may be available even in the late rds.. This is why I said there are no limitations on how many they can talk to because with so many available at different positions, I don't see why the league would say, "hey, you already talked to this many guys, sorry about your luck but you can't talk to anymore". That seems like it defeats the purpose of the combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I did overstate it that they would talk to almost every player. what I meant was they'll talk to as many players as they want even those players they no intention of taking. Your right, there is no way they would talk to all 333 players, but if a team has needs at 6 or 7 different positions, they'll probably talk to just about every available player at those positions to get a feel for who may be available even in the late rds.. This is why I said there are no limitations on how many they can talk to because with so many available at different positions, I don't see why the league would say, "hey, you already talked to this many guys, sorry about your luck but you can't talk to anymore". That seems like it defeats the purpose of the combine.

 

I think they're trying to protect players from being overwhelmed on their time and demands.....

 

You don't want a player feeling like they didn't perform well as an athlete or in their interviews because at some point it all got to be too much....    mental exhaustion, if you will....

 

Not sure if this is a players association request or not...    I just know I've read it in stories in years past....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show me a link where it says there is a limit. I think I'll take Mayock's word for it over yours considering the guy works the combine every yr.. Don't believe it you want, I personally couldn't care less and your assumption that my statement is "absolutely false" needs to be backed up with some evidence to the contrary. Considering Balt. has already spoken to 36 players with 2 days left in the combine, I find it hard to believe they have almost reached their limit. I'm not saying that teams will sit down and interview all 333 players, Thats absurd, but they will speak to a big majority of any players they want to get a feel for.

The only thing I am assuming is that you misunderstood what Mayock was saying. Of course there has to be a limit so that all teams have a chance to interview their guys without spreading the athletes too thin because of limited time.

Baltimore has not interviewed 36 players at the combine, that list says they have interviewed 14 players so far at the combine. But, ok.

Oh, and here's your link. http://www.jaguars.com/news/article-Notebook/2013-NFL-Scouting-Combine-Notebook/c2da55e8-fd5c-4230-9d6b-a12d613ed310

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I am assuming is that you misunderstood what Mayock was saying. Of course there has to be a limit so that all teams have a chance to interview their guys without spreading the athletes too thin because of limited time.

Baltimore has not interviewed 36 players at the combine, that list says they have interviewed 14 players so far at the combine. But, ok.

Oh, and here's your link. http://www.jaguars.com/news/article-Notebook/2013-NFL-Scouting-Combine-Notebook/c2da55e8-fd5c-4230-9d6b-a12d613ed310

 

 

 

Ok, I can admit it. I stand corrected on the actual interviews. However, I still believe teams are permitted to talk with any player outside of an interview setting. This is what Mayock was talking about I believe. Teams do not need to be in an actual interview setting in a hotel room to have a chat with the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I can admit it. I stand corrected on the actual interviews. However, I still believe teams are permitted to talk with any player outside of an interview setting. This is what Mayock was talking about I believe. Teams do not need to be in an actual interview setting in a hotel room to have a chat with the players.

It would be impossible to find a link to prove this wrong but these guys have extremely long days and always somewhere to be. Between scheduled interviews, medicals and testing there isn't downtime for teams to be hounding these guys. 60 interviews is more than enough and they wouldn't set a limit if you could just talk to anyone you wanted. It's already 15 hours of interview time without the time in between. They obviously set the limit at 60 for a reason.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I am assuming is that you misunderstood what Mayock was saying. Of course there has to be a limit so that all teams have a chance to interview their guys without spreading the athletes too thin because of limited time.

Baltimore has not interviewed 36 players at the combine, that list says they have interviewed 14 players so far at the combine. But, ok.

Oh, and here's your link. http://www.jaguars.com/news/article-Notebook/2013-NFL-Scouting-Combine-Notebook/c2da55e8-fd5c-4230-9d6b-a12d613ed310

 

Interesting....

 

The linked story says each team can interview up to 60 different players....    I confess that's more than I thought it would be....

 

That's 15 hours of interviews over the 5 nights of the Combine....     again,  more than I thought....

 

Thanks....    good info....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/29/sport/caitlin-clark-wnba-history-indiana-fever-sparks-spt-intl   Yes, the Fever are losing a lot. But Clark is definitely showing why she was the #1 overall pick.    I’m viewing this season like Manning’s rookie year, lots of losses but enough good moments for a bright future. 
    • From everything I’ve read about the kid, from coaches to fellow players, he does not sound like someone who is selfish, but a hard worker who’s willing to learn and take in improvement.    I think might really have something here. Looking forward to seeing him during training camp!
    • You are wrong he has, didn't take. Most players improve year 1 to year 2. In Raimann's improvement was alot. If Freeland can improve as much, he'll hold his own at RT. He is more athletic than Smith, but weaker to bull rush. While Smith struggles against speedsters, Freeland excelled. So if Freeland can put on some strength he would be fine. Moving Smith to RG he can go back to being a mauler, and maybe add 2 more years to his career. Should've done it for Diem sooner.
    • Tyrese Haliburton resume already: *2-time All-star = 2023, 2024.   *3rd team All-NBA = 2024.   *Selected to the 2024 Olympic Team.   *2024 Assist Champ, 10.9 a game.   *As a player, made a Final 4 = 2024.   -He just turned 24 years old and has already had a great career. Pacers future is bright with this kid and he loves Indiana and playing here which is important.    
    • Through May 28th, the NL Central standings look like this: 1. Brewers 31-23 2. Cubs 28-27 (3.5) 3. Cards 26-27 (4.5) 4. Pirates 25-29 (6) 5. Reds 24-31 (7.5)   @Myles, I see the Cards are playing much better. The Cubs did everyone a favor tonight and beat the Brewers.
  • Members

    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,284

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,379

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,558

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,309

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,850

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...