Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Randy Moss should be considered just for the redzone

GoodLuck

By GoodLuck
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Warhawk Walk On

Warhawk

Posted
Posted

TBH I think he's matured a lot in the last 5 or so years, I wouldn't have a problem signing him in regards to his mentality.

 

That being said, I don't think he's physically capable anymore of producing at the level we'd be looking for, so, I'd still rather not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nothing0 Walk On

nothing0

Posted
Posted

The rest of us watched the Superbowl and skipped the commercials and jiggling thighs. We saw that Moss was the cause of the interception because he wasn't interested in the play. Chicken? T-Rex arms? Thought it was a running play? Who cares. No team in there right mind signs players that take plays off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superman Ring of Honor

Superman

Posted
Posted

The rest of us watched the Superbowl and skipped the commercials and jiggling thighs. We saw that Moss was the cause of the interception because he wasn't interested in the play. Chicken? T-Rex arms? Thought it was a running play? Who cares. No team in there right mind signs players that take plays off.  

 

I don't want Moss for a whole host of reasons, but there's no way I think that interception was his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nothing0 Walk On

nothing0

Posted
Posted

I don't want Moss for a whole host of reasons, but there's no way I think that interception was his fault.

Please explain. 

 

Go back and watch the play. Moss made no attempt to go for the ball. Instead, he was only concerned about getting hit. If Moss had paid any attention to the play/ball, He could have adjusted his route, deflected/caught the ball, or at least defensed the INT.  

 

http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/msn/bill_romanowski_blasts_randy_mosss_super_bowl_performance/12832459

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dustin Walk On

Dustin

Posted
Posted

Please explain.

Go back and watch the play. Moss made no attempt to go for the ball. Instead, he was only concerned about getting hit. If Moss had paid any attention to the play/ball, He could have adjusted his route, deflected/caught the ball, or at least defensed the INT.

http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/msn/bill_romanowski_blasts_randy_mosss_super_bowl_performance/12832459

Did Moss grow 3 feet taller or something? There's no way he would have caught that. And btw Romanowski is an *. He was the one who earlier in the season was saying that Peyton was subconsciously letting the Broncos fall behind so he could lead a comeback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southwest1 Walk On

southwest1

Posted
Posted

In addition to putting the fun in funeral, you also put the U in unforgettable ruksak. Interesting picture...I just can't look away.  :hat:

 

 

It kinda sums up the way this thread makes me feel. 

That picture of the merry go round spinning face & teeth could be used in a dentist office to scare kids straight from the perils of sugar & cavities too. Just a weird thought that popped into my head ruksak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superman Ring of Honor

Superman

Posted
Posted

Please explain. 

 

Go back and watch the play. Moss made no attempt to go for the ball. Instead, he was only concerned about getting hit. If Moss had paid any attention to the play/ball, He could have adjusted his route, deflected/caught the ball, or at least defensed the INT.  

 

http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/msn/bill_romanowski_blasts_randy_mosss_super_bowl_performance/12832459

 

The ball got there in less than a second, and Reed caught it seven yards past where Moss was. There's no adjusting the route. Kaepernick shouldn't have been throwing the ball there, as Moss was surrounded by defenders, and maybe that's why he sailed it.

 

There's just no way that interception is Randy Moss' fault.

 

And I don't really know what to say about the fact that you linked to an article about Romanowski's reaction to the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nothing0 Walk On

nothing0

Posted
Posted
And I don't really know what to say about the fact that you linked to an article about Romanowski's reaction to the play.

:D Entertainment 

 

 

 

 

The ball got there in less than a second, and Reed caught it seven yards past where Moss was. There's no adjusting the route. 

 

That doesn't change the fact that Moss had zero interest in going for the ball or risking the hit. 

 

Okay for the sake of the thread.. My original point was- If I put my GM hat on, I wouldn't go after players that "let up" at times or had questionable effort on the playing field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superman Ring of Honor

Superman

Posted
Posted

:D Entertainment 

 

 

 

 

 

That doesn't change the fact that Moss had zero interest in going for the ball or risking the hit. 

 

Okay for the sake of the thread.. My original point was- If I put my GM hat on, I wouldn't go after players that "let up" at times or had questionable effort on the playing field. 

 

Yeah, I'm sure if you looked harder, you could find a dozen plays that Randy Moss quit on, and you'd get very little argument out of me. He's admitted to it in the past. He acknowledged not playing hard in Oakland. That's part of the reason I wouldn't be interested in him. 

 

I just don't think he did anything wrong on that interception. I think that's all on Kaepernick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...