Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Anthony Richardson Film Study


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, JediXMan said:

Hopefully he learns not to let up on certain plays like that rushing TD against the Texans. That play still annoys me DB wasn’t going to stop him or make him fumble but now he knows the NFL is different when it comes to that.

I'm positive that won't happen again

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2024 at 12:44 PM, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Now you're talking.

 Think about this.

 If Granson had just turned and caught that pass we would have still been rolling instead of giving a free TD.

 If indeed Adoni was supposed to run a 18 yard route instead of cutting it at 14, a good chance (with his great hands) he would have caught that crosser and been rolling, rather than making AR look stupid.

 With those two plays having succeeded, I believe so much of the doubt talk would be much more WOW talk.

 Steichen, Jim Bob, and AR have what it takes to get us to being a excellent offensive team. 

 Interesting this morning on GMF Ron Rivera talked about his early coaching record that included him losing so many games by 6 points or less.

 So he goes to see his friend John Madden who just tells him to go back and study all these losses. So he does and he creates this 20 page document and goes to see Madden. He gives Madden this report, Madden asks what's this. Rivera explains, but Madden says I don't need this, you do.

 The bottom line, Rivera was playing it too safe, going by the old book. Punting rather than going for it. That change soon helped Rivera win two Coach of the Year Awards.

 Think about Philly a couple years ago. INCREDIBLE on 4th down.

We are going to be in a lot of exciting, close games this year.

 And Yes interceptions, fumbles, penalties may leave us pointing the finger at some lost games.

 But our successes on 3rd and 4th downs will be what separates us. lol

 Gonna be awhile before we forget how last season ended.

 It's time to get pumped up because we have GREAT HORSES in the stall!

Some are like very Talented Two Year olds and still need some training, but there are High Quality Stallions alongside ready to show them how to run.

 And I believe we have a top Head Trainer who has some sidekicks that are Studs in their own right!

 Let's getter done, Go Colts! :td: :colts:

This entire post got me pumped up!!! LET"S GO!!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This game wasn't perfect, but it was exciting to watch AR's resilience.  To be down 23-8 in the 4th quarter, convert at least one 4th down, and come back to tie?!  That's gotta get some people excited.  I know I am.  Looking for more throws, and more opportunistic runs for large gains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AR is still in the learning process. I didn't even want him for the Colts. But his athletic abilities are amazing. So I'm going to let him learn and process. I think now we have a good one in him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2024 at 11:13 AM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

 It's because a lot of people don't watch our team. They have no clue. I guarantee he will have a better season than Will Levis. LOL.

I’m tempted to take you up on that! Lol! I wanted the Colts to take either Stroud or Levis. Should be interesting to see how they all do this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm optimistic we're in good hands with AR. I read the stat about him still being the youngest starter in the league even though he's going into year two. 

He's a baby in NFL years and has the opportunity to be really good/great. 

 

Go Colts!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Patrick Miller said:

I’m tempted to take you up on that! Lol! I wanted the Colts to take either Stroud or Levis. Should be interesting to see how they all do this year.

I knew stroud wasn't going  to be there at 4 as he was my favorite  of the 4. I went back and forth  on Richardson  and Levi's multiple times  before  deciding  on Richardson  because  he was younger  and had the potential  to be better than Levi's once he reached the same age.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hilarious, all these Ballard is done comments. What struck me yesterday was how it looked like we weren't prepared. How many times did people make those comments when Reich was the coach? Pagano? Caldwell? Even Dungy-we had PLAYOFF games under Dungy where we looked liked we hadn't practiced all year. The more things change, the more they stay the same. How competitive were the chiefs before mahomes? And I'll also ask, how competitive were we before Manning? 1972-1997 we had FOUR playoff appearances and lost all four. Some of you on here need to smash your computers and get a hobby, you would probably feel better. This team is loaded, give Richardson time, if he looks like Justin Fields 2 years from now(I think he will look more like Mahomes), then we have a problem. 
    • Yeah Ballard might as well start packing. His philosophy has not worked and continues not to work.
    • Trade him? He just handed him a nice extension.
    • Yes, thanks, you’re right. When the Panthers traded to get the 1 is when Ballard said he didn’t have all the information to make the trade. That’s strange to me.  “Didn’t want to make a blind decision without all the information,” Ballard told reporters Monday. “I know for people, they might not understand that. But I think history kind of tells you that when you do that, you better know what you’re getting. And we weren’t quite ready to do that at that time. And then we feel like there’s enough depth in the draft that we were gonna be okay.”   This was in late March. Ballard had a chance to get the 1 and use it to take Stroud not Young. I think it’s strange he said he didn’t move up to 1 because it would have been a “blind decision.” Why would it be a blind decision in March? Why wouldn’t you know what you’re getting? You’re getting whoever you want if you get the 1. It didn’t happen, but Ballard could have recognized that Stroud was going to be superior, could have made the trade and could have drafted him. Ballard admits it never occurred to him to attempt the trade because it would be a “blind decision.” 
  • Members

    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 133

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 11

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indykmj

      indykmj 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,715

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,887

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 2,072

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lukec1995

      lukec1995 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 626

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 441

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...