Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

New turf installed


Recommended Posts

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

Quote

 

Zach Binney, an assistant professor of quantitative theory and methods at Emory University, found through research conducted with analyst Aaron Schatz between 2018-21 that the slit-film turf surface at Lucas Oil Stadium is associated with about a 7% increase of lower-body injuries that led to missing at least one game. His research found there was no major difference to injuries between monofilament-style turf and natural grass.  

 

The NFLPA has an issue with the slit-film turf Indianapolis uses, which is a thicker style of turf blade that can be pulled apart into smaller blades, according to ATX Turf. The slit-film turf blades will fray over the years and contribute to a flatter surface and faster ball movement. Monofilament turf has thinner, singular blades that will not pull apart. These blades will stand up straighter than slit-film turf and have a slower ball movement. The NFLPA said in November 2022 that, at the very least, it is demanding teams change from slit-film to monofilament turf to decrease the chance of injuries.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

That’s what I thought. I have never seen a close up of the old turf like this but pretty sure it didn’t look like this. It looked like cement underneath.

I’ve been on the field before. The old turf was not like that at all. It honestly felt like being on a track. No give and very hard.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

 

No but the old style turf was linked to an increase in non contact injuries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Probably just Camp body , I doubt he makes the roster.
    • I think ST is going to be his bread and butter.
    • from nfl network    Taking away half his game would fundamentally change the player the Colts drafted at No. 4 overall a year ago. Steichen's analogy, however, skirts past that fact that Curry shooting from deep does not in any way increase his injury risk. Richardson taking off can, as evidenced by him leaving three of his four starts early last season.   I don’t see it as a bad analogy. Sure, he “skirts past” the injury risk. But the injury risk is there. It’s there if the pocket collapses and he scrambles out with a spy defender crashing down. It’s always going to be there, and I’m confident they are working to reducing the risk of his running game. But I largely agree that taking away “half his game,” and at this point of his career his best half (by a long shot), would be a huge risk for this franchise as well. His running can mask any slumps in his passing development, and can help this team reach another level in the present. He was drafted to be a runner. Curry was drafted to shoot long balls. If it’s the first thing that came to Steichen’s mind, god forbid he say it…    Let. The. Boy. Runnnn  
    • Yes!   Excellent point.   Smartly said.     1000 percent agree.    🏆 
    • The only comment I’ve heard or read in the media is basically the same thing.   “We get it, but that’s a bad analogy.”     I get his point.  I think it was in artfully stated.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...