Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Compensatory Picks


CR91

Recommended Posts

if this is nfl draft then move it there, but do we get any for saturday, tamme, anderson, and pollak

The NFL office will offset those loses with gains: Avery, Redding, Zbikowski, McGlynn.

The league will calculate not only the quantity, but the quality of loses and gains for each team.

And if there is a net loss, will provide a compensatory at the appropriate level and time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if this is nfl draft then move it there, but do we get any for saturday, tamme, anderson, and pollak

Next year it counts. We only get compensation if we lose more players than we sign. If we lose more players, which is probably what will happen, the Colts should get some real good picks next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL office will offset those loses with gains: Avery, Redding, Zbikowski, McGlynn.

The league will calculate not only the quantity, but the quality of loses and gains for each team.

And if there is a net loss, will provide a compensatory at the appropriate level and time.

good info. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signed: Donnie Avery, Mike McGlynn, Cory Redding, Samson Setele, Reggie Wayne, Tom Zbikowski

Lost: Kerry Collins, Ryan Diem (Do you get compensation for retired players?), Jerome Felton, Pierre Garcon, Anthony Gonzalez, Jacob Lacey, Quinn Ojinnaka, Dan Orlovsky, Mike Pollak, Jeff Saturday

There's still quite a few players that are still on the FA market. We will get a few extra picks next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signed: Donnie Avery, Mike McGlynn, Cory Redding, Samson Setele, Reggie Wayne, Tom Zbikowski

Lost: Kerry Collins, Ryan Diem (Do you get compensation for retired players?), Jerome Felton, Pierre Garcon, Anthony Gonzalez, Jacob Lacey, Quinn Ojinnaka, Dan Orlovsky, Mike Pollak, Jeff Saturday

There's still quite a few players that are still on the FA market. We will get a few extra picks next year.

The lost players only count when they sign with another team so no Diem and Collins dont count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can add Jamaal Anderson (to the Bengals) to the list of unrestricted free agents that the Colts have lost - they are the only ones that are factored in when the league decides on the compenstion picks, not players released - for a total of 9 lost and five signed. I don't think that Reggie counts because he was one of our players but I could be wrong. I won't be surprised if we sign one or two more players - maybe a TE and a D-line - but once the dust settles I would expect the Colts to receive three or four picks next year based on the value of the contracts and the anticipated performance of the players we've lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's already been announced that we'll get a 6th and 7th this year with the possibility of another 6th. I'll have to look into that to be sure though.

Looks like it will be a 4th or 6th rounder. The fact that we signed Kerry Collins will cancel out either the Clint Session or Charlie Johnson losses. It has yet to be determined which pick we'll get. Thanks again Chris Polian for all that you've done for us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL office will offset those loses with gains: Avery, Redding, Zbikowski, McGlynn.

The league will calculate not only the quantity, but the quality of loses and gains for each team.

And if there is a net loss, will provide a compensatory at the appropriate level and time.

That is correct, it is handled by the "NFL Weigh & Balance Committee for Compensatory & Fair Player Movement"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that we signed Kerry Collins will cancel out either the Clint Session or Charlie Johnson losses.

That's unlikely. Collins played 3 games and was minimally productive, and that factors into the equation. Clint started 6, was relatively productive in those 6, and signed a big contract. CJ started all 16. It's all figured in.

I doubt they will lose out on one. It's possible, but I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lost players only count when they sign with another team so no Diem and Collins dont count.

I assume that works the same for re-signing Reggie? I mean he shouldn't count against us next year when they tally up gains and losses, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Bob Sanders? Was he cut or lost in free agency?

players released dont count. only players that left via FA. since jeff, tamme, pollak, and anderson left via FA we might get picks depending on certain weight ins, but guys like peyton,brackett, addai, bullitt, and clark guys we released we dont get anything in return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see us getting much this year. Probably a 4th and 6th. Next year with the loss of Garcon especially I think we will likely get at least a 3rd or 4th. The rest I don't see us getting much for or at least being a wash for what we picked up. If Jeff and Tamme play a lot and are productive we possibly get something else but Garcon is the only one that will really net us something next year.

Here is a separate question. The NO Saints lost their 2nd round pick...that pick according to the players association has to go somewhere or be accounted for. So how will the NFL address that. Will some teams get a compensatory pick.....how about Minnesota, Arizona, and us for them targeting qbs in 2009 lol. But seriously that means compensatory pick/s for somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see us getting much this year. Probably a 4th and 6th. Next year with the loss of Garcon especially I think we will likely get at least a 3rd or 4th. The rest I don't see us getting much for or at least being a wash for what we picked up. If Jeff and Tamme play a lot and are productive we possibly get something else but Garcon is the only one that will really net us something next year.

Here is a separate question. The NO Saints lost their 2nd round pick...that pick according to the players association has to go somewhere or be accounted for. So how will the NFL address that. Will some teams get a compensatory pick.....how about Minnesota, Arizona, and us for them targeting qbs in 2009 lol. But seriously that means compensatory pick/s for somebody.

All teams will essentially slide up one slot for the rest of the draft when when the draft reaches the Saints 2nd round pick. I don't think any compensatory picks are being given to the teams who were a target of the bounties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All teams will essentially slide up one slot for the rest of the draft when when the draft reaches the Saints 2nd round pick. I don't think any compensatory picks are being given to the teams who were a target of the bounties.

I know those targeted wont that was kind of a joke but there has to be some sort of compensatory picks because the NFL has to ensure that the money and job that would have come from that pick goes to a player somehow. I am not sure exactly how it works but essentially the players union the NFLPA will say that it isn't fair to eliminate a "players" job over the scandel. I would think that would mean say like 3 or 4 later round picks handed out to equal the pay of the lost 2nd rounder. I could be wrong because I see no word on this out there but it doesn't make sense to me that the NFL will void a players chance to be a second round pick because they are punishing the Saints and not put in some compensatory picks to offset the lost money to players.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know those targeted wont that was kind of a joke but there has to be some sort of compensatory picks because the NFL has to ensure that the money and job that would have come from that pick goes to a player somehow. I am not sure exactly how it works but essentially the players union the NFLPA will say that it isn't fair to eliminate a "players" job over the scandel. I would think that would mean say like 3 or 4 later round picks handed out to equal the pay of the lost 2nd rounder. I could be wrong because I see no word on this out there but it doesn't make sense to me that the NFL will void a players chance to be a second round pick because they are punishing the Saints and not put in some compensatory picks to offset the lost money to players.

Like in the Patriots case for Spygate and the Broncos 2005 lost 3rd rounder over salary cap infractions, it will go off without a hitch. The Player's Association didn't make the argument before and likely won't do it now. They also won't hand out extra picks in that manner, because the draft has a preset amount of picks within it. There are 256 picks in any draft, making up 8 rounds of 32. These include lost picks (like the 255 plus the Broncos lost pick in the 2005 draft) and compensatory picks (such as the 254 picks in the 2011 draft, along with Josh Brent and Harvey Unga being supplemental picks in the 2010 draft, moving their selection back a year.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hypothetical '8th round', by the way, is from Compensatory picks. After they hand out how ever many they decide are deserved, they then tack on more picks at the back end of the 7th round in normal draft order. So if any less than 31 picks are handed out, the Colts will get an extra pick at the end of the 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see us getting much this year. Probably a 4th and 6th. Next year with the loss of Garcon especially I think we will likely get at least a 3rd or 4th. The rest I don't see us getting much for or at least being a wash for what we picked up. If Jeff and Tamme play a lot and are productive we possibly get something else but Garcon is the only one that will really net us something next year.

Here is a separate question. The NO Saints lost their 2nd round pick...that pick according to the players association has to go somewhere or be accounted for. So how will the NFL address that. Will some teams get a compensatory pick.....how about Minnesota, Arizona, and us for them targeting qbs in 2009 lol. But seriously that means compensatory pick/s for somebody.

Ik your jk but that Would be every team they played not just us three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The McGinn column that I can find describes what happened at the combine in front of all of the scouts (below). Is there another column from him about Mitchell? There must be based on the conversation in this thread.    DRAFT Part 1, WR/TE: Hall of Fame talent at the top, then (many) questions Marvin Harrison Jr. leads the way. You'll see receivers fly off the board the first two rounds. But scouts have concerns. Bob McGinn's 40th annual series begins.   Part 1, WR/TE: Hall of Fame talent at the top, then (many) questions - golongtd.com   By Bob McGinn   (About halfway through the column is a discussion of Mitchell's combine performance)   Coming off a 55-reception, 11-touchdown season at Texas, Mitchell did everything at the combine other than the short shuttle, the 3-cone and the bench press. And, after his blazing 40 of 4.35 and exceptional distances in the jumps, his decision to work at the combine appeared to be paying off.   Then Mitchell, wearing the WO19 jersey, started running the various routes in line with other wide receivers. His performance was insufficient, to say the least.   “He blew that 40 out, which didn’t surprise me,” one veteran scout said. “But then his position workout might have been the worst I’ve seen by a top receiver. He was falling over. He dropped balls. He had to keep redoing. It seemed as if he didn’t know how to run routes. He just seemed out of it.   “Generally, I don’t get alarmed by a combine. That was alarming.”   Based on television coverage, Mitchell staggered and fell during the gauntlet, dropped the first two slants, dropped an out and either messed up the route or failed to make the catch on his next three attempts. His performance was adequate after that.   “He was very linear, very straight line,” another scout said watching Mitchell at the combine. “Which surprised me, because in my limited exposure, for a fast guy, I thought he could actually bend and get in and out of his cuts.   “After running fast, the position stuff didn’t match. It wasn’t terrible. It wasn’t fatal. But it definitely raised some alerts with me. He didn’t have a great combine.”   Mitchell stood on his combine numbers and did position drills March 21 at Texas pro day, leaving the bench press and shuttles void.
    • Pretty much sums up what most of feel on here but it is the slow time of year and hopefully can enlighten some and spark some conversation.   https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/32-nfl-teams-in-32-days-colts-need-a-healthy-anthony-richardson/ar-BB1omOPy?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=72b391309fba48589a10207956078d03&ei=29  
    • Does a reporter bear any responsibility about what he includes in his pieces? Sourced or not? Is everything a source tell you printable? Is everything worth printing? BTW I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I just wonder if there are any ethical considerations a reporter might have when reporting on this type of touchy subject, especially when some of those anonymous scouts might have vested interest in a player getting drafted higher or lower than currently projected? 
    • Again….   McGinn didn’t do the damage to Mitchell.  The scouts did.     And there are columnists like McGinn at every major paper.  Their job is to gather info and report it, whether it’s popular or not.    Let me turn this around.  Hypothetically, a few years from now if Mitchell doesn’t pan out and he’s moody and difficult to deal with and he’s a bust, then the scouts will have been proven correct.  And people here will say McGinn’s column was spot on.   Another person who should’ve handled his business better is Mitchell himself.  He’s been living with this since he was roughly 16.   And scouts said he interviewed badly with them.   Even Mitchell admits it.     I don’t think this is as black and white as it seems to you.      To be clear…. I love Mitchell.  Glad we drafted him.  I’ve said several times that Ballard defending him draft night was smart and scored points with the kid.  Now he comes out and says that exact thing.  He appreciates that Ballard defended him so hard and he wants to pay the Colts and Ballard back by being the best player he can be.   
    • I’d say those teams that lost had worse defenses compared to the winners. That’s not to say that their defenses were bad, they just weren’t as clutch in the big moment.    To me, defense matters a whole lot when you need a stop or a momentum change.    Look at all of the star studded power offense teams of the last decade who were incapable of winning it all. 
  • Members

    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • atapcl

      atapcl 83

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Ernest Brunelli

      Ernest Brunelli 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,969

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,214

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,666

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,518

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...