Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Manning Will Go To Kc If Not With Ind


SubZero

Recommended Posts

So Kansas City has shown some intrest in signing Manning if he is avaliable. So if the colts do decide to release him, then i suspect him of heading to KC. The main reason why is there cap space, cause they are top in cap space with almost 24 dollars. They would be able to sign Manning to a nice contract while taking care of there own players. They also could bring in Wayne if they wanted to. Sadley i think Manning would abuse the Colts if they faced KC next year but i think they could get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Kansas City has shown some intrest in signing Manning if he is avaliable. So if the colts do decide to release him, then i suspect him of heading to KC. The main reason why is there cap space, cause they are top in cap space with almost 24 dollars. They would be able to sign Manning to a nice contract while taking care of there own players. They also could bring in Wayne if they wanted to. Sadley i think Manning would abuse the Colts if they faced KC next year but i think they could get him.

That's probably not enough. It will take at least 30 dollars (according to LaCanfora, and he's always right).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha sorry 24 mil!

Yeah, we're just greasing you. From what I've read, the cap isn't really defined this year yet. And there's all kind of exceptions, and exemptions.

So, teams like Miami, KC, and Washington wouldn't have a problem signing him. Let's face it, Peyton will play where he wants to play.

I'm still hoping that's Indy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Kansas City has shown some intrest in signing Manning if he is avaliable. So if the colts do decide to release him, then i suspect him of heading to KC. The main reason why is there cap space, cause they are top in cap space with almost 24 dollars. They would be able to sign Manning to a nice contract while taking care of there own players. They also could bring in Wayne if they wanted to. Sadley i think Manning would abuse the Colts if they faced KC next year but i think they could get him.

\

Is that dollars or doll hairs ? My daughters have a closet full of doll hairs. Maybe I can sign him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we're just greasing you. From what I've read, the cap isn't really defined this year yet. And there's all kind of exceptions, and exemptions.

So, teams like Miami, KC, and Washington wouldn't have a problem signing him. Let's face it, Peyton will play where he wants to play.

I'm still hoping that's Indy.

I heard that KC and WAS are pretty loaded with cap space. But i heard MIA was only had like 6mil.

But yet again im not 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that KC and WAS are pretty loaded with cap space. But i heard MIA was only had like 6mil.

But yet again im not 100%

Don't know. Miami doesn't have very many star players besides Long, Soliai, Marshall, and a few others. I don't even know if they're keeping Bush.

A team can always find a way to bring a guy in if they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Kansas City has shown some intrest in signing Manning if he is avaliable. So if the colts do decide to release him, then i suspect him of heading to KC. The main reason why is there cap space, cause they are top in cap space with almost 24 dollars. They would be able to sign Manning to a nice contract while taking care of there own players. They also could bring in Wayne if they wanted to. Sadley i think Manning would abuse the Colts if they faced KC next year but i think they could get him.

Redskins have 40 million in cap space but same division as eli so so doubt it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I guess Hayneworth didn't EAT it all up after all.

Thats what i read, wish had link, an article can always be wrong

with all the money the

article said

the Colts offense should go east with a package for Peyton , Clark, Saturday, Wayne & Garcon so Peyton would have familiar receivers and Sat to get the ball from

That redskins have a descent run game and a top 10 D

But as said , cant see him in Elis division

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the thread title yet. At first glance I assumed this to be another oldunclemark thread. lol

It's been pretty widely speculated for some time now that Miami, Kansas City, Arizona and Washington are the most likely landing spots but honestly I think he'll still be a Colt next year. And no, that's not blind optimism talking...it's simply what I truly believe will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be ironic if Peyton went to the same team that caused his injury in the first place.

What would be something for him to do is go to Washington, sign a 100 million dollar contract and then reveal he is unable to play and take all Synders money. After he gets home, he could send Snyder a little note that says thanks for having my career short and thanks for the guaranteed money, I will spend it wisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Kansas City has shown some intrest in signing Manning if he is avaliable. So if the colts do decide to release him, then i suspect him of heading to KC. The main reason why is there cap space, cause they are top in cap space with almost 24 dollars. They would be able to sign Manning to a nice contract while taking care of there own players. They also could bring in Wayne if they wanted to. Sadley i think Manning would abuse the Colts if they faced KC next year but i think they could get him.

if thats the case i guarentee you they lose a couple draft picks.....they will be investigated in tampering charges as was talked about during the combine, some small print on talking about signing manning if he becomes a FA. their head coach is who the chiefs can thank for that lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manning to Bowe would be deadly combo!

Are you sure you wanna Manning in that weak division?

To think about Manning facing the Colts in the Playoffs.....I'm not comfortable with this.

It would be like getting your butt kicked by your ex-girlfriends new bo. A pride obliterating slap across the face.

Come to think of it, number28, don't you ever mention that again. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with the OP, but not for cap space. KC is ready , is the best team Manning can go of all the teams people have mentioned. if im PM and im not going back tot he colts (and i will cry that day) im going to KC. is a no brainer for me. that team has it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steichen and AR/Flacco will go to whomever they trust in the moment when the game is on the line. See, every situation is different so saying "you dont..." is kinda stupid, especially coming from someone with nothing more than madden experience ;)
    • People who go to games are not forced to buy parking or concessions. I've gone to a game and not bought anything, and still had a good time.   Your point holds up better when talking about the preseason games.
    • We just played a team with a QB who had been in the building for two weeks, and he only had two incompletions the entire game, and we lost. We played a rookie who had been struggling to move the ball, he put up over 300 yards on us (and a couple turnovers). Justin Fields kind of had his way with the defense in the second half, and if not for a couple of fluky turnovers, the Steelers probably do better than 24 points.   We've played one good QB, and so far, we're 14th in points/game, 29th on 3rd down, 26th in the red zone, 20th in scoring percentage, 19th in points/drive, 23rd in completion percentage against (68.9%, up from 65.1% last season), 23rd in net yards/attempt (which accounts for sacks), 26th in passer rating against. I won't even mention the rushing stats, but we know they're not good (trending much better, but still not good). What's saving the defense right now is a decent sack rate, a decent pressure rate, and a pretty high turnover percentage (8th best).   The sack rate is still kind of troubling, it's about the same as last season, but I think the pressures are coming faster on critical downs. We also struggled to get into pass rush situations in the first two games, and have been looking better the last two games, so I feel like this is trending in the right direction, but it's still a small sample size. This production could be sustainable. The turnover rate, probably not. I expect the turnovers to come down when we play better QBs and offenses.   Two months from now, we will have played Stroud again, Josh Allen, Aaron Rodgers, and Jared Goff. (Darnold is in there also, and he's been very effective with the Vikings so far.) Let's see what it looks like after that.   IMO, the defense has been better the past two weeks, but still giving up a lot of yards, and they struggle to get stops in the second half. It seems like the run defense stuff was a fluke, but we'll see. We're still not good in coverage, and it's only when the pass rush is working that we're able to make good things happen.   So I don't think we're being too hard on the defense. The defense is probably below average, and that's after we've faced three mediocre/inexperienced QBs in a row. 
    • Gouging or buying unwanted stuff in order to get the stuff you want is reflective of an un-free market.  Its called captive pricing, reflective of a limited market or a monopoly.   Its not a whole lot different than buying a car that groups option packages.  So in order to get the leather seats, you also have to buy the $350 floor mats.  Except car buyers don't have the captive customers sports teams do.  If they all do it, then there is a  collusionary element to it too, because it inhibits the ability to enjoy a different team.  The choice is to not buy at all, and that's not really a free market.    The free market aspect of it was the guy selling two tickets to pay for that stuff.  He made a decision that unwound the effects of captive pricing on him.  Good for him.,   Don't lecture me on this stuff. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...