Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts @ Ravens Saturday Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

This might be going quietly unnoticed, but Walker is having a pretty good game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BlueShoe said:

This might be going quietly unnoticed, but Walker is having a pretty good game. 

For not much game action, i totally agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts (only) down by 3 points after 3 quarters. Man, it's raining, drissling, and moist  and COLD at the M&T Bank Stadium. Those teams, people and fans should be credited exposed to the outside elements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Douzer said:

Mingo has rare speed...

 

His abilities are not measurable. 

 

Amazing how he is not an all-pro at this point in his career. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Is Wilson even being targeted? If not, it means he’s doing better

 

Wilson is playing lights out football at RCB tonight. 

 

I dare say it is like we went back in time to a couple of years ago at RCB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here come the flag-fest. We are giving it to them. 

 

Implosion time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

Flacco is 27 of 35...but we have defensed him well..They have `16 points

No consistent pressure from the edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

i agree

I was going to say pretty much the same thing about him when I saw your post...so I really did concur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Touchdown Ravens!

 

Colts 13 Ravens 23

 

Check out the time of possession. 

 

ND   BAL
First Downs 13   22
Total Yards 227   305
Passing Yards 153   206
Rushing Yards 74   99
Penalties (Yds) 2(19)   3(15)
Turnovers 0   0
Punts (AVG) 2(37)   2(32)
Time of *. 19:07   32:13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...