-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By RollerColt · Posted
Correct. It will have more to do with him putting faith in the current group and allowing them playing time. It could backfire, for sure. But, I will say some of the best managers in the business put trust in their players to succeed. -
By NewColtsFan · Posted
You’ve learned nothing about Ballard. You'd rather trade picks to acquire a safety who will want to become one of the highest paid safeties in football. 1. Ballard is not trading high picks for a safety, ANY safety. 2. He’s not going to make Baker, or ANY safety one of the highest paid at his position. As for Simmons and Diggs…. I think one is 30 and the other is 31. Their PFF grades show they’re still playing at a good level. Ballard wasn’t afraid to sign Rodney McCloud and he was much older. If Ballard doesn’t sign Simmons or Diggs it won’t have anything to do with their age -
By richard pallo · Posted
I really do like this strategy. My only concern is both Diggs and Simmons are in their 30’s. If we really wanted to nail the position down I would prefer trading for Baker and extending him. Cross and Scott behind Blackmon and Baker would be a nice backup pair of young talent pushing the veterans. -
I’d still feel a lot better if they picked up a veteran FS. I hope Scott or Cross are the future, but we haven’t seen much from either of them to really know. Bring in a vet and let one of them beat him out. Competition is always the best way for the cream to rise to the top.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now