-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
-
I love these maps. Thank you for posting them. In the second map, I wonder why parts of Texas and all of New Mexico is getting the Browns @ Eagles game? It seems that the Cardinals-Packers game would be shown. 🤔 -
After a disappointing loss, the Indianapolis Colts (2-3) travel to Nashville (1-3) to play the Titans who are coming off their bye week. If Anthony Richardson is not healthy to play, Joe Flacco will start. Flacco has put up good numbers in place of AR. Will Levis will start this game for the Titans after leaving his last game with an injury. Levis has turned the ball over nine times in his four starts (6 INTs and 3 fumbles lost). He has played well at times but has thrown interceptions at the worst of times. Injury/status for the game: Colts: WR Josh Downs (toe): Questionable CB Kenny Moore (hip, shoulder): Questionable WR Michael Pittman Jr. (back): Questionable QB Anthony Richardson (oblique): Questionable OT Braden Smith (knee, ankle): Questionable RB Jonathan Taylor (ankle): Out Titans S Jamal Adams (hip): Out DL Keondre Coburn (knee): Out LB Cedric Gray (shoulder): Out Hopefully some of those who are questionable will be well enough to play. What are your thoughts on this game? Would you like Richardson to play? Are you expecting changes to the defense after the showing last week? Please keep all game discussions in this section while the game is taking place. Good luck! Enjoy the game.
-
Personally I like Ballard. He’s pretty honest and sticks with his beliefs. But you are your record. No division titles, no playoff wins, one of the worst defenses in football the last three years, mediocre win loss record. I really hope AR develops, but if he doesn’t, even if it’s due to injuries, it may be time to start over. New GM who will bring in needed players, new DC who will play a modern NFL defense, and new QB who will be available. I really hope not. I’m getting too old to go through this again. -
That shows you how much I know about the Padres. 😂. The last time I followed baseball closely, I thought the Padres would start winning soon because they had by far the most prospects in the top 100. I assumed that they were winning now with some of those prospects and with a few free agents sprinkled in. Getting Tatis at age 17 is not signing a high-priced free agent. If I am not mistaken, Tatis was one of the players I saw in their top 100. If a player is acquired before age 22 or so, I don't have a problem with that. It is high-priced free agents that I don't like. For example, the year that Machado and Harper were free agents, I was vehemently against signing them. Most Mets fans wanted to sign one of them. They were so disappointed that the Mets did not sign them for $200+ million. I like to build teams with young guys and without acquisitions of superstars. I like this Mets team.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now