Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Roster moves


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Multiple teams have switched kickers this week.  As far as I know Shrader hasn't received any interest other than from the Colts.  He isn't a big deal for me.

I have always worried not keeping 2 kickers on the 53 because what if Matt Gay pulls a hamstring in the 1st Qtr, then we go all game without a FG kicker. That can cost you a game. Rigo can kick extra points I am sure, but he isn't a FG kicker that can make a big FG from 50 yards with the game on the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I have always worried not keeping 2 kickers on the 53 because what if Matt Gay pulls a hamstring in the 1st Qtr, then we go all game without a FG kicker. That can cost you a game. Rigo can kick extra points I am sure, but he isn't a FG kicker that can make a big FG from 50 yards with the game on the line. 


I really doubt they’ll ever have two kickers active, unless they already suspect their #1 is nursing an injury.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smonroe said:


I really doubt they’ll ever have two kickers active, unless they already suspect their #1 is nursing an injury.  

Not disagreeing with you but,

 

I would though because of the reason I stated above. We can be in a gigantic game with the division on the line and If Gay gets injured during the game = we are screwed in a close game. I think of everything. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Not disagreeing with you but,

 

I would though because of the reason I stated above. We can be in a gigantic game with the division on the line and If Gay gets injured during the game = we are screwed in a close game. I think of everything. 


I get you.  You have to think about what group you’re sacrificing to keep him active.  Special teams, extra O lineman, etc.   That’s why it seems like a luxury move to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Not disagreeing with you but,

 

I would though because of the reason I stated above. We can be in a gigantic game with the division on the line and If Gay gets injured during the game = we are screwed in a close game. I think of everything. 

Rigo kicked field goals in college.   If the game was on the line,  I'm sure they would give him a shot

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Rigo kicked field goals in college.   If the game was on the line,  I'm sure they would give him a shot

Just looked it up: 

 

72 out of 74 extra points made, and 21 out of 24 field goals made in college. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Maybe that is why we only kept 1 Kicker. I would have to analyze the roster better to see who I would leave off if I did keep 2 kickers. 

I don't think any team carries 2 kickers on the 53 man roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jvan1973 said:

I don't think any team carries 2 kickers on the 53 man roster

 

The only way a team would do it is if it's a playoff game and they knew their normal kicker couldn't get there from say 55.  They may want to keep a guy who has a better shot at a longer FG, even though he's not as accurate as their prime guy.

 

Luxury move, but could pay off if you have the roster space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

The 2006 Colts did, and we even had Adam. Martin Gramatica was on the roster and even made a FG and got a ring.

He was here for a couple weeks when Vinny was hurt.  

39 minutes ago, Hawkeyecolt said:

Years ago, during the Peyton era, the Colts drafted a kickoff specialist and carried him for a while.  He was out of Michigan St.   That experiment didn’t last long. 

I don't recall  that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

He was here for a couple weeks when Vinny was hurt.  

I don't recall  that

Usually, teams don't carry 2 Kickers and I get why, some have but it is rare. You would probably either have to carry just 2 QB's or maybe 1 less Lineman to do so. I would almost rather keep an extra decent Kicker than keep Sam because Sam is never going to play anyway. I feel comfortable with AR and Flacco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Usually, teams don't carry 2 Kickers and I get why, some have but it is rare. You would probably either have to carry just 2 QB's or maybe 1 less Lineman to do so. I would almost rather keep an extra decent Kicker than keep Sam because Sam is never going to play anyway. I feel comfortable with AR and Flacco.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about hair.   Does anyone think Grant Stuard is immature?    Look up that kids background 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hawkeyecolt said:

Years ago, during the Peyton era, the Colts drafted a kickoff specialist and carried him for a while.  He was out of Michigan St.   That experiment didn’t last long. 

Raimon or Raiford or something like that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

I don't think any team carries 2 kickers on the 53 man roster

The Colts used to back with Vandy.  They kept a third to do kickoffs and every year people talked about how they were wasting a roster spot to do that.  
 

I think the whole kicker in game injury bit is a little over blown with some.  I’ve been a Colts fan for over 35 years and I can think of one game where the kicker got hurt in game.  It was the MNF game vs the Ravens a few years ago.  They did exactly what you said.  Sent Rigo out to kick and then dealt with it after the game.

 

this is is not a common thing and definitely not a common enough thing to blow a roster spot over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Colts used to back with Vandy.  They kept a third to do kickoffs and every year people talked about how they were wasting a roster spot to do that.  
 

I think the whole kicker in game injury bit is a little over blown with some.  I’ve been a Colts fan for over 35 years and I can think of one game where the kicker got hurt in game.  It was the MNF game vs the Ravens a few years ago.  They did exactly what you said.  Sent Rigo out to kick and then dealt with it after the game.

 

this is is not a common thing and definitely not a common enough thing to blow a roster spot over.

I'm not remembering a kickoff specialist.   I'm getting old though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hopefully this punts us into the playoffs.
    • Having Crosby sounds fun, but I don’t think Chris would part with that many picks to get him. 
    • I'm not remembering a kickoff specialist.   I'm getting old though
    • n football, aDOT stands for average depth of target, which is a metric that measures how far downfield a player is typically targeted on average. It's calculated by dividing a player's air yards by their targets.   Here's what aDOT can tell you about a player:   How likely they are to perform: A low aDOT means a player is likely to catch the ball closer to the line of scrimmage, which reduces their chances of making big plays. A high aDOT means a player is close to making big plays and big yards.   How their position affects their aDOT: Running backs typically have a lower aDOT because they catch passes behind the line of scrimmage more often.   How deep they run routes: A higher aDOT indicates that a player is running deeper routes.   While aDOT is a useful metric, it can be flawed because situation and the quarterback can influence it. For example, a quarterback who leads often may not have a high aDOT. It's also possible for aDOT to be inflated or deflated by outliers. For example, if a player has one 60 yard target and five bubble screens, their aDOT will be around 10.0, which doesn't give the full 
    • I had to look that up and ADOT sounds like a weird stat to me.  How far the intended target was but doesnt count if it was caught?  Why we would we use this instead of yards per catch or attempt?
  • Members

    • FRW

      FRW 236

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Too Proud

      Mr. Too Proud 73

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,808

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 365

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,576

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 335

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pigskin

      Pigskin 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,229

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bertjones7

      bertjones7 354

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 4,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...