Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts vs Steelers post game


GoColts8818

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

It says very mild. From what I understand if it’s in the mild side he could still play next week. 

People tend to panic when a player gets an injury ever since Andrew, I get it and I am not a doctor but Taylor like AR both said they could have came back in if need be. Had it been the playoffs, they would have been in is my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DougDew said:

You are on a negativity roll tonight.  Just check out how many negative posts you write directly at other posters...to other people...just the last few pages even...but get all bothered over neutral posts about an impersonal entity like a team.   Its like you think me and @Moosejawcolt and some others are supposed to care about your opinion or something.

 

I have said before, just this season, 

  • Josh Downs looks very good, but I haven't said that much because he hasn't played much. 
  • JT has looked good, when he was playing.
  • I liked it when JT bounced it outside last game.  I think it may have been the first time I saw him where he was closer to a sideline than a hashmark.  That was great.  
  • AR looked good, when he was playing.  
  • Steichen is a good coach and a great play caller, and uses JT wonderfully. 
  • Gus is probably one of the best D coordinators in the NFL.  Just look at what he can do when the D is missing 2 of its highest paid stars.  I assume most folks here think Defo and Moore matter?
  • I've liked Cross since the day he was drafted.
  • I thought it was fine to not add secondary players during the offseason.

Lots of positive stuff.

Agree.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

And the sacks and drives that stalled. The fact JT couldn't get going because the threat of AR was gone. Those things matter

The same drives that stall when AR can’t complete a pass. Also JT is going to be JT no matter what. Way before we had AR, JT lead the league in rushing. His success is not going to be dependent on who is playing QB. JT slowed down because he banged his foot/ankle up.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

I see some are still drunk from the game.

No it’s facts. He had the lowest completion percentage in the league at 48% before the game started. He also leads the league in interceptions thrown by a QB with 6.

 

Flacco was accurate and didn’t turn the ball over. I get the “Anthony is still a developing rookie” ordeal but to deny the fact that he hasn’t played good is just silly. I’m not calling him a bust, but to me Flacco should start. Why would you not keep starting the better player? It’s also better for Richardson long term if Flacco starts. 
 

Ballard is fooling people with this notion that the only way to play is to get better. Tell that to Jordan Love.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

The same drives that stall when AR can’t complete a pass. Also JT is going to be JT no matter what. Way before we had AR, JT lead the league in rushing. His success is not going to be dependent on who is playing QB. JT slowed down because he banged his foot/ankle up.

 

No actually. That happened near the end of the game. The run game hit a wall for the majority of the game til JT finally hit two big runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

The same drives that stall when AR can’t complete a pass. Also JT is going to be JT no matter what. Way before we had AR, JT lead the league in rushing. His success is not going to be dependent on who is playing QB. JT slowed down because he banged his foot/ankle up.

JT best  year was in 21. Who was the QB? Wentz had legs and was always a threat to run plus his arm had to be respected. When the defense has to guess who has the ball on run plays it’s going to open things up for Taylor.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

i wish ballard would have paid moss

 

I could be wrong, but I think I remember it being reported when free-agency began that the Colts had actually offered Moss more money than his current team, but Moss wanted to be a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

JT best  year was in 21. Who was the QB? Wentz had legs and was always a threat to run plus his arm had to be respected. When the defense has to guess who has the ball on run plays it’s going to open things up for Taylor.

Wentz was not the athlete at QB the AR was. If Wentz beat you with his legs that was something the defense would allow because he’s getting you 10 yards at best. Tbh most QBs in the NFL can do that. Mayfield, Burrow, Goff, etc… I don’t think the threat of Carson Wentz running for 10 yards made life easier for JT. As long as the QB can pass the ball, JT will get his yards. You forget he had 1,000+ with Rivers too who was a statue. And that was with him not even being the starter untill Mack was out for the season.

 

I’m not denying that having AR back there changes the way the defenses might play slightly, but I don’t think it’s make or break. Saying otherwise is disrespectful to JT and the OL that has been killing it this year. I also don’t remember anyone ever saying “Man 1800 yards is crazy! He’d have even more if he had a dual threat QB”. JT is a special player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dw49 said:

 

Sprotac has us with around 55 mill in cap space next year. Looks to me we will let Kelly and MAC walk. Leaves us with Odeyingbo , Blackmon , Raimann, Fries , Speed and Sanchez .  Those 6 would pretty much eat the 55 mill. IMO opinion , Fries might make the OL as a whole too pricey . Will be an interesting off season.

Not worried at all.  Ballard will sign the players he wants to retain.  Colts manage the cap with the best of them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Smonroe said:


I think the issue with such little TE activity is that we don’t really have one that a big threat.  They're more important as blockers.  
 

So, you may as well use your WRs as the main targets.  They’re all better at creating separation than any TE.  

Yes but Cox is a big target in the red zone and should be used more and look what happened when a TE shedded a block and was wide open for a TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, indyagent17 said:

Yes but Cox is a big target in the red zone and should be used more and look what happened when a TE shedded a block and was wide open for a TD


Their job yesterday was to chip Watt on every play.  And they did a great job of it.  Drew got open after the chip, they said the play was set up for MPJ but he was covered.  So Drew drifted to an open spot.  
 

Think of it this way, if they have a set play to a TE, he’s not going to chip.  Does that put your QB at risk if they have a good edge rusher?

 

Overall, I think they’re doing a good job with them even though they’re hardly in the stat sheet. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

Football players get hurt.   Also,  the toughest boxer alive wouldn't be tough if he couldn't take a punch.   Your analogy is terrible.   Try again

Why would you of all people believe I give two cents about your thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

Flacco isn't a journeyman backup.   He has a Ring.  He took the browns to the playoffs last year.   He is very capable of winning games,  but AR is the future 

You left out what playing Flacco does to Taylors performance. Think before your post. AR is the future? Really? Based on what, hospital data?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...