Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2024 Preseason Game #1: Broncos @ Colts, August 11th, 1 PM ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

I’m a little more worried about corner than safety in some respects. Flowers didn’t look good out there, if JuJu or Jones gets injured we could be in trouble there. And that’s assuming JuJu and Jones take the next step. At least at safety we have 4 guys we experience in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Patrick Miller said:

It’s hard to see where any of these scrubs are worth keeping.

I never expect to be blown away by the 4th and 5th string guys. You may see some flashes, but a majority of the guys playing now won't make the final 53. Abraham has looked great, as well as Land.

 

Just now, Old Man and the COLTS said:

Maybe Bradley is showing the 2023 defense so we can surprise all in the regular season lol

Preseason defenses are typically pretty vanilla, so I wouldn't read much into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

No serious injuries.  I’m good.

I would’ve felt better if Anthony Richardson would’ve had a better showing. But I’m glad we came away with nothing serious injury wise.

Good grief how pathetic. Make a stop you scrubs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shive said:

I never expect to be blown away by the 4th and 5th string guys. You may see some flashes, but a majority of the guys playing now won't make the final 53. Abraham has looked great, as well as Land.

 

Preseason defenses are typically pretty vanilla, so I wouldn't read much into it.

I hear you but our vanilla hasn’t been a good vanilla lol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CoachLite said:

Before training camp, I figured we would win 9 games. I've adjusted that down to 8. The rest of the league has improved, and I'm not sure the Colts have kept up.

Well, it’s hard to tell after one preseason game, but we do have a lot of talent on offense especially if Richardson pans out .  Bradley and the defense might be our Achilles heel though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PackersNation said:

No, just being honest. 

 

Is it a problem that I don't like the depth at RB behind JT?

 

I did not say it was a problem. I asked what you thought of him after what you saw on this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I did not say it was a problem. I asked what you thought of him after what you saw on this game.

He had eight carries for 16 yards.

 

I'd like to see more. At this point I still want the Colts to sign a RB after cuts to 53 on August 27th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Old Man and the COLTS said:

I hear you but our vanilla hasn’t been a good vanilla lol

Especially when Bradley defense during the real games are pretty vanilla without much disguises, blitzes, coverage swaps, etc., 

 

But, what I always wonder about Colts is that this defense is still not completely blown away and picked apart so something is working... Maybe the reason is, some of the players' talent or the way they keep it soft zone not to give up many big plays to opponents? I guess the latter, let's see what they do with defensive line and secondary in games that matter this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are exactly right sir, you have to disguise and mix up the coverages during the course of a game or you will give up the 3rd and longs too often, which we do repeatedly at the worst possible moments. And what is really puzzling for as much soft zone vanilla defense that we play, there are running backs coming free out of the backfield way to often. I'm always asking how can that happen? On Moore's interception yesterday Franklin was way too late getting there. How does that happen? That would have been a huge gain for the broncos had the guy caught it cleanly. Just dialing up another 5-8 blitzes a game would make a big difference. Speed and Moore are excellent blitzers, waiting to see what Carlies can do. Simpson was a solid talker at Auburn, he could have success as a blitzer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VikingsFanInChennai said:

Especially when Bradley defense during the real games are pretty vanilla without much disguises, blitzes, coverage swaps, etc., 

 

But, what I always wonder about Colts is that this defense is still not completely blown away and picked apart so something is working... Maybe the reason is, some of the players' talent or the way they keep it soft zone not to give up many big plays to opponents? I guess the latter, let's see what they do with defensive line and secondary in games that matter this year.

I think talent has a lot to do with it and experience.  Experience is huge imo.  It allows you to react and play fast.  Players still learning can react slower and make wrong decisions.  Eleven talented players have to be on the same page simultaneously.  That’s what makes it work imo.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • NFLfan unfeatured and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not when you're getting gashed from the opening kickoff, players shouldn't be worn down till the second half into the 4th quarter. In the first 2 games we've gotten run over from the first hand off. The Green Bay game we had really good run defense the entire second half, but, who knows, the Packer backs could have been gassed from all the running they did in the first half.
    • Does anyone ever wonder how our opponents can seemingly have tight coverage on our backs, te's, and wr's so our qb's have to "thread the needle" so to speak(Manning and Luck were always making throws that you don't know how they ever completed their passes). But for the past 52 years we don't cover anyone, seriously, I've watched every game since 1996(Sunday ticket) and the most frustrating thing about Colt football is we don't guard anyone. Opponents wonder through our secondary uninhibited virtually every play. It can't be that hard to cover someone sometimes, our opponents do. Even though through the first 2 games this season we've had A LOT of wide open receivers and backs, this offense is loaded, give Richardson time he'll get the ball to them.
    • 50% for me unbelievable, on to week three 
    • Has a little bit to do with it ...zero sustained drives put together does make it hard on a D ... By the time they take their helmets off and sit down, it's time to go back in the game already.
    • But Peyton had a body of work to see, from college...and you could see early on that he was going to be good. Richardson has nothing to look at to think he will be a franchise QB . Also on the Peyton Manning part, look at how much differently the rules were in the NFL back then...WRs and QBs took far more punishment than they do now, the rules have changed a lot, to make things easier for the offense 
  • Members

    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 93

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • luv_pony_express

      luv_pony_express 1,439

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 755

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,208

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts4life81

      Colts4life81 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,616

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsblue1844

      coltsblue1844 404

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bravo

      Bravo 1,476

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RandomOldGuy

      RandomOldGuy 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 783

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...