Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NFL Preview Tampa Bay at Colts plus injury reports


Restinpeacesweetchloe

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

Good for AR and the Colts he's back in the building. I hope Brents is ready to go this week.

Lol, didn't see the AR part in the OP tweet, I had just been trying to find a good home for that tweet.

 

 

Definitely need Brents back.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

This is the first time in a few weeks Steichen has said we will see about Brent’s. Hopefully that is good news.

 

Looks like a no go to me. Probably needed a limited today to be on tract for a return. That looked to be pretty serious when it happened and evidently it was.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah, but we have trouble with all WRs so it can't get much worse.

 

Win the turnover game, win the game, I think.

They need to keep mayfield in the well or pocket. Don’t let him roll out. He has trouble if he has to  throw from pocket too much. If Brent’s doesn’t go that will make things even harder.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah, but we have trouble with all WRs so it can't get much worse.

 

Win the turnover game, win the game, I think.

 Really not too surprising as we've lost Gilmore from last year and Rodgers , Flowers and Brents this year. Forgetting Gilmore , we are playing without our top 3 CBs . 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dw49 said:

 Really not too surprising as we've lost Gilmore from last year and Rodgers , Flowers and Brents this year. Forgetting Gilmore , we are playing without our top 3 CBs . 

Yep and some how still have (3) CBs graded in the top 57, when Brents gets back.

 

3 CBs(Nickel) x 32 teams = (96) "starting" CBs across the league(I know not all teams run nickel as base, we seem to majority of time). So to have 3 in top 57 is pretty miraculous for what we have lost at the position.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope to see some tweeks on offense this sunday. We’ve struggled when the opponents sits on the run, so hopefully Steichen and crew have thought up a solution. 
 

I know Minshew is a limited talent, but if it’s just more of the same I’ll be disappointed. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, dw49 said:

 Really not too surprising as we've lost Gilmore from last year and Rodgers , Flowers and Brents this year. Forgetting Gilmore , we are playing without our top 3 CBs . 

Jones has been very good so far if he continues and we see something from Ameer Speed our young Corner room may grow into something special.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Solid84 said:

I hope to see some tweeks on offense this sunday. We’ve struggled when the opponents sits on the run, so hopefully Steichen and crew have thought up a solution. 
 

I know Minshew is a limited talent, but if it’s just more of the same I’ll be disappointed. 

I wonder if we can use the screen or short passing game to extend the run game. This is kind of big for that.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I wonder if we can use the screen or short passing game to extend the run game. This is kind of big for that.

 


the short passing game is pretty much all the colts have been doing all year. I have been calling for more screen passes all year, but the colts don’t use it and I don’t know it would be effective when teams are playing your short passing game. You need defenders to drop down field to open up the field for screens.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, husker61 said:


the short passing game is pretty much all the colts have been doing all year. I have been calling for more screen passes all year, but the colts don’t use it and I don’t know it would be effective when teams are playing your short passing game. You need defenders to drop down field to open up the field for screens.

What doesn’t help is Minschew is not a strong armed quarterback who can throw deep.  So they can play the short passing game.  It has worked occasionally as the quick short passes to the outside with blockers in front have resulted in a number of big gains and touchdowns on occasion.  Our OL is a strength and can get downfield to block when called on.  The guards pull very well.  I’m expecting big things from JT the rest of the way.  He’s our big playmaker and is ready to breakout imo.  More roll outs for Minschew would be a good tactic as well imo with more motion from our WR’s thrown in as well.   I think we need to focus on our strengths which is our very good OL and JT along with Minchews mobility.  Just my 2 cents.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, richard pallo said:

What doesn’t help is Minschew is not a strong armed quarterback who can throw deep.  So they can play the short passing game.  It has worked occasionally as the quick short passes to the outside with blockers in front have resulted in a number of big gains and touchdowns on occasion.  Our OL is a strength and can get downfield to block when called on.  The guards pull very well.  I’m expecting big things from JT the rest of the way.  He’s our big playmaker and is ready to breakout imo.  More roll outs for Minschew would be a good tactic as well imo with more motion from our WR’s thrown in as well.   I think we need to focus on our strengths which is our very good OL and JT along with Minchews mobility.  Just my 2 cents.

Minshew is an NFL QB and can throw deep.   He needs the plays to be called and his receivers to be one on one.   He has to take a shot from time to time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, richard pallo said:

What doesn’t help is Minschew is not a strong armed quarterback who can throw deep.  So they can play the short passing game.  It has worked occasionally as the quick short passes to the outside with blockers in front have resulted in a number of big gains and touchdowns on occasion.  Our OL is a strength and can get downfield to block when called on.  The guards pull very well.  I’m expecting big things from JT the rest of the way.  He’s our big playmaker and is ready to breakout imo.  More roll outs for Minschew would be a good tactic as well imo with more motion from our WR’s thrown in as well.   I think we need to focus on our strengths which is our very good OL and JT along with Minchews mobility.  Just my 2 cents.

 

I really wish Taylor can become, once again, one of the top backs through the remainder of this season. But I have my doubts he will.

 

We got JT signed, along with Moss, and for once, our highly paid line is finally healthy (knock on wood). The pieces are in place for success on the ground.

 

My opinion, as to why we seem to have difficulty consistently establishing the running game, is because the team does not run enough plays from under center. 

 

I'm watching San Francisco (Shanahan) now, and see how effective McCaffrey is when they run with the QB under center.

 

I believe JT's production would greatly benefit, if Steichen would just come out with Minshew, lined up under center, and run the ball. 

But unfortunately, it seems SS has almost abandoned that formation, and is going to continue to run nearly every play from the shotgun formation.

 

Ballard invested heavily in Taylor, and seems to be committed in wanting to establish the Colts as a "hard nosed running team"...

yet I don't think that identity is really possible without, at least a decent percentage of the plays being run from under center.

 

...And some of the other benefits, in running from under center, is the play-action pass looks much more deceiving, to the eyes of the defenders.

and it's more successful than shotgun, for those short one yard (goal line) situations, we always struggle to convert.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

 

I really wish Taylor can become, once again, one of the top backs through the remainder of this season. But I have my doubts he will.

 

We got JT signed, along with Moss, and for once, our highly paid line is finally healthy (knock on wood). The pieces are in place for success on the ground.

 

My opinion, as to why we seem to have difficulty consistently establishing the running game, is because the team does not run enough plays from under center. 

 

I'm watching San Francisco (Shanahan) now, and see how effective McCaffrey is when they run with the QB under center.

 

I believe JT's production would greatly benefit, if Steichen would just come out with Minshew, lined up under center, and run the ball. 

But unfortunately, it seems SS has almost abandoned that formation, and is going to continue to run nearly every play from the shotgun formation.

 

Ballard invested heavily in Taylor, and seems to be committed in wanting to establish the Colts as a "hard nosed running team"...

yet I don't think that identity is really possible without, at least a decent percentage of the plays being run from under center.

 

...And some of the other benefits, in running from under center, is the play-action pass looks much more deceiving, to the eyes of the defenders.

and it's more successful than shotgun, for those short one yard (goal line) situations, we always struggle to convert.

 

Not being able to run is the direct affect of Minshew nor throwing down field. Why should teams defend downfield when he only throws it on rare occasion. On the first drive against pats he threw a 30 yard pass to McKenzie then Taylor ran really well that first drive. Going to have to throw down field to open up the run game. I agree I am not liking shot gun it hurts the play action and the run game. Steichen is going to have to run away from Vea. More outside runs. The Tampa secondary is really bad but it kinds of plays into the hands of the colts since Minshew don’t throw down field. Pittman and downs should have big days if Minshew can throw the ball well.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Not being able to run is the direct affect of Minshew nor throwing down field. Why should teams defend downfield when he only throws it on rare occasion. On the first drive against pats he threw a 30 yard pass to McKenzie then Taylor ran really well that first drive. Going to have to throw form field to open up the run game. I agree I am not liking shot gun it hurts the play action and the run game. Steichen is going to have to run away from Vea. More outside runs. The Tampa secondary is really bad but it kinds of plays into the hands of the colts since Minshew don’t throw down field. Pittman and downs should have big days if Minshew can throw the ball well.

I totally agree with you, that Minshews passing game is hurting the running game... But also, every time they try to run a handoff, when the QB is 6 yards deep, in the shotgun, doesn't help either.

 

If our QB is not a great threat at deep passing, and since we have the great o-line and backs... maybe then, they should try establishing the run? 

And seriously, what great running team, Would only run plays out of the shotgun? After all, the shotgun is a passing formation, not a running formation.

 

Its obvious Ballard wants the Colts to have the "hard nosed" reputation...

Remember, a couple years back, when the team was marketing the slogan "Just Run the Damn Ball" 

That idea seems foolish, if the offense operates nearly 100% of the time from shotgun

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Bucs LB group injured I can see some outside runs being successful. I don’t think Steichen will be as stubborn as Reich and run up the gut when he knows that’s Tampa’s strength. 
 

Remember the hatred towards Reich when we played Tampa in 21. 27 straight passes but it was successful. The bad thing Reich didn’t do when they got a big lead was then run to use clock after that big lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

With Bucs LB group injured I can see some outside runs being successful. I don’t think Steichen will be as stubborn as Reich and run up the gut when he knows that’s Tampa’s strength. 
 

Remember the hatred towards Reich when we played Tampa in 21. 27 straight passes but it was successful. The bad thing Reich didn’t do when they got a big lead was then run to use clock after that big lead.

The only single TB player Steichen mentioned in his press conference was Vita Vea. He is certainly aware of his presence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

The only single TB player Steichen mentioned in his press conference was Vita Vea. He is certainly aware of his presence.

I think the key to this game will be keeping baker in the pocket and not letting him roll out and getting pressure on him. Because they can score. Their defense might be beat up but they have a good offense.  If Colts defense doesn’t  play well we won’t win because I don’t think Minshew is good enough to get in a shootout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I think the key to this game will be keeping baker in the pocket and not letting him roll out and getting pressure on him. Because they can score. Their defense might be beat up but they have a good offense.  If Colts defense doesn’t  play well we won’t win because I don’t think Minshew is good enough to get in a shootout.

Two TB games (out of the three) I watched the past few weeks, the Bucs secondary was absolutely atrocious. So that may.come into play as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Two TB games (out of the three) I watched the past few weeks, the Bucs secondary was absolutely atrocious. So that may.come into play as well?

I would feel more confident about taking advantage of that if the offense had looked better last two weeks. I just don’t have faith in Minshew. Hopefully some things get fixed in the bye week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I almost spit my coffee out reading this a few times, lol!  I love sarcasm and I especially love it when there is some truth to it!  Well played Sir!
    • I guess the whole question is the merits of the report. You report on his diabetes with tons of guesses and speculations and WITHOUT taking the side of the person who's been affected here and who's living and dealing with that condition. You report on the player being uncoachable WITHOUT taking the opinion of his coaches about being coachable or not(and BTW from what I've heard both from Colts and Texas coaches, this is resoundingly NOT TRUE). You report about him being immature and honestly, everything I've seen on the surface suggests the opposite. You report about his combine performance by giving it a pretty harsh reading(the video is in this thread and the account of what happened by McGinn is in this thread... People can actually go and look at what happened and make their own mind about whether the characterization of that workout was fair or not. I will just say you can represent the player stumbling in a drill and going again in various different ways and McGinn chose a specific way to represent it. It was the most negative way you could choose).    You know I had my own reservations about that outburst by Ballard at the presser, but the more I'm learning about Mitchell the more I actually believe in what Ballard was saying and the less merit those reports have in my mind. Maybe I have my own unconscious biases too, now that I have vested interest in Mitchell actually being good for us. I don't know     I guess ultimately none of it matters. AD's success or failure won't depend on some pre-draft reports... it will depend on how he handles himself from now on, how hard he works, his drive to be great and our staff's ability to get the best of him. 
    • if he is healthy and they make the playoffs in spite of, say, Houston being the 1 or 2 seed in a loaded afc, you think Irsay would contemplate firing him? That would mean we took another step forward and AR proved he could stay healthy and play ball. I don’t see his seat being hot in that scenario at all. I see the organization being fired up with that and ready to hit the offseason hard to take the next step forward. 
    • Hmmm.   ”Healthy excuses will be hard to come by.”    Really?   Richardson, who had less than a thousand snaps in college, then had roughly 200 snaps his rookie year.  There’s one.   And Houston has Stroud who had a great rookie year.  Aren’t most media predicting Houston and JVille ahead of Indy this year?  That’s two without any trouble.     I just think insisting on a division title because a fan thinks it’s time doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny.   Sorry, just my two cents…. And often not worth that much.   
    • For me absolutely it does. If Richardson stays healthy excuses will be hard to come up with. As positive as I am with Ballard at some point we have to start winning. He bet on himself by bringing in his own home grown talent this year, what he does at safety in the coming month and a half has me worried as well. We were so close to winning the division last year with a back up QB that my expectation is winning the AFC south this year.    If they make it into the wild card game and lose then the seat is just as hot for me. If they advance further and make a Cinderella run then I’m fully back on board.
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,976

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,356

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,464

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 90

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,857

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,071

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 1,056

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...