Greg Cosell AFC South preview

[Moosejawcolt]

 https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/F6D86A/arttrk.com/p/DF7K3/verifi.podscribe.com/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/DFT9347046577.mp3?updated=1685016682

I think most people respect his opinion.

[sb41champs]

I DO respect his opinion.

 

Thanks for sharing!!

[throwing BBZ]

IMO we are looking very solid on the D-Line. And in VG shape at RB IF Taylor is at 90%+.  That's it!!!
 

The rest is show me with a tremendous amount to prove.

If Cosell predicted 6 wins +-  he is on target.
 I couldn't read the article because of NOT respecting someone's opinion.

[Smonroe]

1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

IMO we are looking very solid on the D-Line. And in VG shape at RB IF Taylor is at 90%+.  That's it!!!
 

The rest is show me with a tremendous amount to prove.

If Cosell predicted 6 wins +-  he is on target.
 I couldn't read the article because of NOT respecting someone's opinion.

Agreed. But you kind of lost me with that double negative last sentence.  

[ChuggaBeer]

2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

IMO we are looking very solid on the D-Line. And in VG shape at RB IF Taylor is at 90%+.  That's it!!!
 

The rest is show me with a tremendous amount to prove.

If Cosell predicted 6 wins +-  he is on target.
 I couldn't read the article because of NOT respecting someone's opinion.

I'd add in LBers and TE's as above average.  Not sure if that  would be considered solid or VG.     And we have a healed up safety that will put that group into the above average category 

 

All this is my opinion.  

[Jackie Daytona]

2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

IMO we are looking very solid on the D-Line. And in VG shape at RB IF Taylor is at 90%+.  That's it!!!
 

The rest is show me with a tremendous amount to prove.

If Cosell predicted 6 wins +-  he is on target.
 I couldn't read the article because of NOT respecting someone's opinion.

You couldn't read the article anyway.  Its audio ...

[Chucklez]

7 hours ago, Jackie Daytona said:

You couldn't read the article anyway.  Its audio ...

Proof that he definitely didnt click on the link lol.

[Mitch Connors]

16 hours ago, ChuggaBeer said:

I'd add in LBers and TE's as above average.  Not sure if that  would be considered solid or VG.     And we have a healed up safety that will put that group into the above average category 

 

All this is my opinion.  

Interesting take on the TE, I would classify them as below average largely because we don't have a single TE in the top 16 in the league IMO. Some of that could be the QBs or the system under Frank. Either way, I much prefer your take to mine. 

[shasta519]

2 hours ago, Mitch Connors said:

Interesting take on the TE, I would classify them as below average largely because we don't have a single TE in the top 16 in the league IMO. Some of that could be the QBs or the system under Frank. Either way, I much prefer your take to mine. 

Woods has that potential, but we have only seen flashes. Granson is a fairly average to below average player. MAC is what he is. Ogletree and Mallory are wildcards. 
 

I think right now…this room is probably below average with potential. 

[Hoose]

17 hours ago, shasta519 said:

Woods has that potential, but we have only seen flashes. Granson is a fairly average to below average player. MAC is what he is. Ogletree and Mallory are wildcards. 
 

I think right now…this room is probably below average with potential. 

Agree. But if Woods develops as I think he will, this will be an above average group by season’s end. 
Also, if Leonard is 90%, the LB group is definitely above average. 

[Matabix]

Woods showed same flashes as MAC did in his 2nd year. Remember that catch in the Raiders game? I think since than MAC has gotten into his own head. Woods had a couple of catches last year that wouldn't have been caught by a normal TE. So excited about his future but want to see more in his blocking. Right now I would agree with Cossell, are TE room is average, but has potential to be among the top.