-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
No. But once they have the years of experience and system training to reach that level, I think they are more interchangeable with each other than what most folks think. Certainly their success or failure is based more on random things out of their control than what they get praised or blamed for. JMO. -
Sorry to jump in, but I find this a very interesting topic. I don't think that anyone can do the job, but I do believe there are far more than 32 who can. Several FOs are full of bright men/women with extensive knowledge of football and a strong grasp of the fundamentals of roster building/scouting/analytics. With a good support structure is put in place, I think many could make the jump. Look at KC for example...Dorsey's FO alone makes up 3 of those 32 jobs. While I am not Ballard's biggest fan, he is clearly capable of the doing the job. As is Veach...and even Poles. Another, Brandt Tillis, is the second-in-command in CAR I believe. That's just one FO. So that's partly why I disagree with the idea that there would be a huge downside to losing Ballard. Not to say there aren't bad GMs, but the odds of finding a good one aren't that low because the pool is so large. Contrast that to coaching, where I don't believe there are even close to 32 good HCs at a given time. -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
And i bet they drafted Latu to drop off into coverage? Now I really do get it!! -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
Actually Lombardi had said that if Murphy was on the board, the Colts may have picked him. I threw that out weeks ago as Buckner is getting older the 3tech is the most important position on this defense. -
By RollerColt · Posted
Am I understanding you correctly that you feel all GMs are not really that valuable? That essentially anyone can do the job?
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts