Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Have Been Connected to OG Evan Mathis.


Recommended Posts

Mathis is known to be more of a zone blocker that man to mean...not a 'strong' run blocker. Is solid however (Thus the pro bowls...)

Can we change!?

Zone scheme is a whole lot better than the terrible scheme power run scheme that the Colts run that you almost can't even tell they have a scheme. There are actually holes in a zone scheme. Just a mess most of the time with Colts power scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we change!?

Zone scheme is a whole lot better than the terrible scheme power run scheme that the Colts run that you almost can't even tell they have a scheme. There are actually holes in a zone scheme. Just a mess most of the time with Colts power scheme.

I agree with the assessment that we have failed to make holes in the man to man   (Not mean :))  I think we maybe too stubborn to change even if it is a better option.

 

I was just mentioning to Gavin because he had questioned Anton's question above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the assessment that we have failed to make holes in the man to man (Not mean :)) I think we maybe too stubborn to change even if it is a better option.

I was just mentioning to Gavin because he had questioned Anton's question above.

Yeah no doubt they would be to stubborn! They continuously have been! Just like us Colts fans! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah no doubt they would be to stubborn! They continuously have been! Just like us Colts fans! :)

OK...just made me laugh.  Heck they would not even play who all of us fans thought were better players that were on the bench..let alone change schemes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connected probably just means the Grigson-Eagles connection. Doesn't necessarily mean the Colts are interested.

 

 

I think the tweet is just naming the teams ESPN thinks would make sense.

 

 

I haven't seen anything about Mathis being connected to the Colts.

 

John Clayton:

 

Q: With the recent release of Evan Mathis from the Eagles, what do you see as the chances that he may wind up in Denver? He hasn't found a trade partner for two years and a minimal contract with a chance to shine and potentially go to the Super Bowl is better than no money. It may not be the best fit for Denver either, but they are needy at O-line and he definitely would be an upgrade.

Ben in Knoxville, Tennessee

A: The Broncos aren't among the four main teams looking at Mathis (Indianapolis, Kansas City, Miami and San Francisco). Though he would be big upgrade at guard, I don't see them having enough money to make the move. They have $6.91 million of cap room left this year and have already committed more than $127 million next year. Mathis -- who's coming off back-to-back Pro Bowls and is considered one of the best guards in football -- is in enough demand that he might be able to pull off a two-year deal even though he's 33. Gary Kubiak plans to go young with the offensive line this year. They want to give Ty Sambrailo a shot at left tackle and might use Michael Schofield at right tackle. Because Peyton Manning releases the ball so quickly and Kubiak is so good at settling up the run game, Denver will probably take a pass on Mathis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Clayton:

Q: With the recent release of Evan Mathis from the Eagles, what do you see as the chances that he may wind up in Denver? He hasn't found a trade partner for two years and a minimal contract with a chance to shine and potentially go to the Super Bowl is better than no money. It may not be the best fit for Denver either, but they are needy at O-line and he definitely would be an upgrade.

Ben in Knoxville, Tennessee

A: The Broncos aren't among the four main teams looking at Mathis (Indianapolis, Kansas City, Miami and San Francisco). Though he would be big upgrade at guard, I don't see them having enough money to make the move. They have $6.91 million of cap room left this year and have already committed more than $127 million next year. Mathis -- who's coming off back-to-back Pro Bowls and is considered one of the best guards in football -- is in enough demand that he might be able to pull off a two-year deal even though he's 33. Gary Kubiak plans to go young with the offensive line this year. They want to give Ty Sambrailo a shot at left tackle and might use Michael Schofield at right tackle. Because Peyton Manning releases the ball so quickly and Kubiak is so good at settling up the run game, Denver will probably take a pass on Mathis.

Interesting. I too had not seen the Colts mentioned in connection with Mathis. I saw articles that named the Dolphins, Giants, Falcons, Saints, Seahawks and Broncos as possible landing spots. The Raiders too, as they still have about $20M in cap space.

While the Vikings need a left guard and Mathis has played on teams with the Vikings OL coach (Carolina) and with Coach Zimmer (Bengals), I don't see the Vikings signing him. Hopefully the line will protect Bridgewater better than they did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the assessment that we have failed to make holes in the man to man   (Not mean :))  I think we maybe too stubborn to change even if it is a better option.

 

I was just mentioning to Gavin because he had questioned Anton's question above.

imo we have not made holes in man blocking because we don't have the monsters to do it, sign mathis, build the monster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainly the Colts are just stubborn and refuse to fix the offensive line when it has been one of the worst position groups on the team for mutiple years! I don't really understand it! The Cowboys showed what a good o line can do for an offense.

Does the FO just love to prove people wrong? It's not working. All season it was dreadful! The playoffs get stepped up but it was still far from great. I don't get it. It's the most important position on the offense besides QB and the QB needs to be protected and helped out.

I'm sure there are other reasons why they don't want him but if the offensive line fails to play well once again people are not gonna be happy and everyone might as well throw the Super Bowl hopes out the window.

If you missed the link, here it is again: http://t.co/gAjfC2hzKB

— Stephen Holder (@HolderStephen)

June 16, 2015
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just the story that ESPN ran with who they think Mathis would be interested in. If it happens it will be a done deal without much said before it is done.

 

Mainly the Colts are just stubborn and refuse to fix the offensive line when it has been one of the worst position groups on the team for mutiple years! I don't really understand it! The Cowboys showed what a good o line can do for an offense.

Does the FO just love to prove people wrong? It's not working. All season it was dreadful! The playoffs get stepped up but it was still far from great. I don't get it. It's the most important position on the offense besides QB and the QB needs to be protected and helped out.

I'm sure there are other reasons why they don't want him but if the offensive line fails to play well once again people are not gonna be happy and everyone might as well throw the Super Bowl hopes out the window.

If you missed the link, here it is again: http://t.co/gAjfC2hzKB

— Stephen Holder (@HolderStephen)

June 16, 2015

 

I wouldn't mind the signing for a year or two, but I think in the end we might just be better off walking away.. But his connection with Grigson is something that always gives me that small bit of hope that we could make a run for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think the health of Cherilus is going to weigh heavily on our decision to pursue Mathis. If Mewhort has to play RT. I would feel A LOT better knowing that Mathis and Herremans (or maybe even Donald Thomas) is our starting guards. I'm not a fan of Reitz, Thornton or Louis as starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should cut Thomas and Cherilus, sign Mathis and be done with it.  we then would have an OLine of castonzo, Mathis, Holmes, Hennemen and Mewhort.  Gore will have a fileld day running behingd that group.  Luck can then pick and choose who to throw to.  IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should cut Thomas and Cherilus, sign Mathis and be done with it.  we then would have an OLine of castonzo, Mathis, Holmes, Hennemen and Mewhort.  Gore will have a fileld day running behingd that group.  Luck can then pick and choose who to throw to.  IMO

I can't fathom why they would want to keep Thomas. He must be the greatest locker room guy of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainly the Colts are just stubborn and refuse to fix the offensive line when it has been one of the worst position groups on the team for mutiple years! I don't really understand it! The Cowboys showed what a good o line can do for an offense.

Does the FO just love to prove people wrong? It's not working. All season it was dreadful! The playoffs get stepped up but it was still far from great. I don't get it. It's the most important position on the offense besides QB and the QB needs to be protected and helped out.

I'm sure there are other reasons why they don't want him but if the offensive line fails to play well once again people are not gonna be happy and everyone might as well throw the Super Bowl hopes out the window.

If you missed the link, here it is again: http://t.co/gAjfC2hzKB

— Stephen Holder (@HolderStephen)

June 16, 2015

Amen Bravo 4460! A power house o-line changes everything. It builds confidence, it rests your defense, & it brings back an ancient relic called the running game. Whoa dude. Gore with daylight in front of him. Imagine that...

 

Don't get me started on this notion that WRs & TEs are going get us to the SB. I agree with you 100% INDY's success in the playoffs is contingent upon our power pigs up front. Plain & simple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen Bravo 4460! A power house o-line changes everything. It builds confidence, it rests your defense, & it brings back an ancient relic called the running game. Whoa dude. Gore with daylight in front of him. Imagine that...

 

Don't get me started on this notion that WRs & TEs are going get us to the SB. I agree with you 100% INDY's success in the playoffs is contingent upon our power pigs up front. Plain & simple. 

I love our passing game personnel. If we can consistently run the football effectively against good defenses that will just make the passing game even more efficient and this offense could be historic. I don't know why anyone would prefer to keep Cherlius and Thomas if letting them go meant cap space to sign a guy like Mathis, but that's just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, there are ethical considerations.  But I’d say those are in a case by case basis.     But the vast majority of comments are going to be used.  Now if a reporter thinks a source is trying to bad mouth a player, perhaps for professional gain, they can decline to use the info and also stop using the source if the source loses credibility.     Source relationships are obviously important and can get tricky.
    • OOOps! "Edition" not "Addition", lol!  Mods please correct my faux pas.
    • I had actually never seen the specific comments about diabetes until this Destin article...or Part 1 of this Bob McGinn article for that matter. I knew some things were said though and Ballard didn't like it.   But now that I have read Destin's article and McGinn's article, I just don't agree with the narrative Destin is pushing here. He's trying to portray AD as a R1 talent who was unfairly treated by the rumor-mongering media, which caused teams to not draft him until R2.   But we all know it doesn't really work like that anymore. And McGinn's article has additional not-so-flattering comments from scouts during AD's Combine workout (not just his diabetes management or coachability). So we know a glimpse into what some scouts were thinking back as far as the Combine, which was well before McGinn even published this article in mid April.   The bigger picture for me is "man, that sure seems like a lot of discouraging comments from scouts." And McGinn didn't have an agenda...he just happened to have more material on AD Mitchell than others and he published it.         
    • I think I was wrong in my guess here. On later inspection, it seems like the more likely situation is that the part about his diabetes is still in this article, but it's just hidden behind a paywall.. 
    • That could have happened. Could have been a HIPAA issue too.   But I think the fact that these other quotes existed (even if they were put in later) adds necessary context to this situation. It wasn't just AD being the victim of some smear campaign that somehow heavily influenced NFL teams...as seems to be the narrative. Instead, there were also concerns among different scouts (assuming it wasn't one scout) about other aspects, including his Combine workout.   So we know what some thought...and we know what happened. 10 teams drafted WRs before AD. Yes, 3 of those WRs were going earlier than him no matter what, but 7 other WR-needy teams opted for other WRs. And even Ballard actually traded down with him on the board. It seems fairly safe to assume that NFL teams didn't have him as a R1 WR, or top 5 at the position, for reasons beyond a couple comments from anonymous scouts. 
  • Members

    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,502

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 88

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,513

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TigerColt

      TigerColt 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,857

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...