Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldunclemark

Green Bay (+ 7 1/2) @ Seattle (1-18-15)

Recommended Posts

Should have gone for it!!

Rainy, windy, playing in Sea. Points are at a premium here. 

 

 

PS: They just got another TO. Adding to the intelligent decision to kick. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bet they regret not being more aggressive in the red zone? I understand being conservative but they could be up atleast 2 possessions but its still a one possession game after two turnovers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You wanna beat the Hawks, do that. Don't let Wilson run and he becomes average. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You wanna beat the Hawks, do that. Don't let Wilson run and he becomes average. 

He's a decent QB, but he really rides the coattail of that D and special teams. I wouldn't want to rely on him having to win games from the pocket.

 

Even so, the only young QB I'd put above him is Luck as the clear #1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm torn on this game, I'd much rather play Seattle in the superbowl, but on well.

 

I would rather play the Packers defense and the Seahawks offense lol. Interestingly enough, Colts have beaten both before under Luck. I think mobile QBs fair better vs. Seattle then statues like Manning/Brady anyway.

 

Sadly we have yet to beat NE........*gulp*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How so?    I remember a quote about wanting to be a top run team...but is he sounding like they are going to be forcing the issue this season with run?
    • Ian Rapoport tweet.  Interesting!  Just 1 year!! (I would have bet he was wanting more)   And how much, vs. what McCoy would have cost?  Just a swap?      
    • No, I actually think we have a RB stable that is deep, diverse and good enough for this team's success. The biggest thing that bugs me is that he parrots disproved narratives and I worry that he will be focusing on the wrong things. I don't mind if we are top 5 running team in the league. It certainly beats being bottom 10 running team.
    • there were several who said no early round WRs. some saying we didn't need to a WR at all. interesting you said "almost nobody". i'd point out the posters, but no reason to rub it in, as they are not whining about my post....   and personally I said I wanted one in R2 several times..... the debate you and i had was over the value in R1. you followed up by cheery picking bad stats, and i went in depth listing the stats to show plenty of value.   guessing you're still sore about previous critiques and looking to complain about something... 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...