Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

CJ Spiller


Recommended Posts

My fellow fans starting to sound desperate now. What's the difference between spiller and trent? Maybe except the fact you get 1 or 2 break out td runs per year from cj and injuries.

 

 

If there was that small of a difference the Bills would have traded Spiller away along time ago in similar fashion to what the Browns did to Trent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was that small of a difference the Bills would have traded Spiller away along time ago in similar fashion to what the Browns did to Trent.

The Bills are more like the Colts are with Richardson. Sitting around hoping he'll be good so he won't look like a 1st round bust. It's not hard to see why they haven't traded him away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills are more like the Colts are with Richardson. Sitting around hoping he'll be good so he won't look like a 1st round bust. It's not hard to see why they haven't traded him away.

 

 

I don't think so.  Kind of hard to get anything going when you don't have a quarterback, and you haven' t had good receivers for most of your career until recently.  Defense can easily stack the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills are more like the Colts are with Richardson. Sitting around hoping he'll be good so he won't look like a 1st round bust. It's not hard to see why they haven't traded him away.

 

Good heavens...

 

1) CJ Spiller is much better than Trent Richardson.

 

2) No one cares if a player looks like a bust but fans and media. 

 

3) Doug Whaley didn't even draft Spiller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The shape our o-line is in I don't think it would matter if we had Spiller. I am in the camp of fixing the o-line then looking at other position players.

 

 

I doubt we'd have to give away a whole lot to get spiller in FA.  Line can be fixed through the draft, and firing this O Line coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we'd have to give away a whole lot to get spiller in FA.  Line can be fixed through the draft, and firing this O Line coach.

Why is your answer to everything is firing someone? The 0-line coach can only work with the players he has. So you think he has good o-linemen across the board to work with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is your answer to everything is firing someone? The 0-line coach can only work with the players he has. So you think he has good o-linemen across the board to work with?

 

 

You must not be real familiar with any of my answers because I rarely call on anyone to be fired. When everyone was calling on Pagano to be fired after the Dallas game I said I would reserve my call on the situation until after the playoffs.  I didn't call for his head like some of the others.   

 

I am not the only voice as of late who feels the O Line coach may need to go.  When the blocking is bad you have to consider all options, and of course I have considered the players as well. I certainly am not going to leave the OL coach out. I've already stated before we may need upgrades at the guard positions.  Tell us why you would not consider that the coach may be the issue as well?   I've even gone so far as to include a possible schematic issue as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must not be real familiar with any of my answers because I rarely call on anyone to be fired. When everyone was calling on Pagano to be fired after the Dallas game I said I would reserve my call on the situation until after the playoffs.  I didn't call for his head like some of the others.   

 

I am not the only voice as of late who feels the O Line coach may need to go.  When the blocking is bad you have to consider all options, and of course I have considered the players as well. I certainly am not going to leave the OL coach out. I've already stated before we may need upgrades at the guard positions.  Tell us why you would not consider that the coach may be the issue as well?   I've even gone so far as to include a possible schematic issue as well.

Then why start now? Gilbert has one year under his belt with 25 years in the collage ranks. Least we forget he has coached a line that has Luck holding a lot of records. He just has no consistent  linemen to work with at this time. Every time a coach is fired it's back to square one. We have had enough of that in the last three seasons IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why start now? Gilbert has one year under his belt.

 

 

Start what now?  If you're talking about Gilbert, so did the special teams coach that we had before the guy we have now but Pagano and Co sent him packing.      You have no basis to say it shouldn't be considered, along with saying that none of our guards are any good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why start now? Gilbert has one year under his belt with 25 years in the collage ranks. Least we forget he has coached a line that has Luck holding a lot of records. He just has no consistent  linemen to work with at this time. Every time a coach is fired it's back to square one. We have had enough of that in the last three seasons IMO.

 

We've hardly had any coaching turnover in three years. Aside from Pagano being out in 2012, the only two changes have been Pep for Arians, which I think is becoming a net positive, and Tom McMahon replacing Marwan Maalouf, which is a huuuge positive. I don't remember any other coaching changes... we added Chud, but he didn't replace anyone. (Edit: Forgot we lost Goodwin with Arians.)

 

If you have a particular defense of Joe Gilbert, that would be better than decrying the idea that anyone could possibly think that he's done a less than adequate job. Of all the units on this team, offensive line has been the worst, the least consistent, has seemed to go backward at times, and it could be argued that there's been little to no development of the players he's had to coach. I'm not one who calls for anyone to be fired, but it's not hard to believe that we could do better than Gilbert at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Start what now?  If you're talking about Gilbert, so did the special teams coach that we had before the guy we have now but Pagano and Co sent him packing.      You have no basis to say it shouldn't be considered, along with saying that none of our guards are any good. 

If all you want to do is argue find someone else. Gilbert and every coach is reassessed at the end of every year. Standard procedure. Just because you think he should be fired don't automatically make it a correct call. If you would be so kind as to reread your comment it stated to fire the o-line coach. Your own words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've hardly had any coaching turnover in three years. Aside from Pagano being out in 2012, the only two changes have been Pep for Arians, which I think is becoming a net positive, and Tom McMahon replacing Marwan Maalouf, which is a huuuge positive. I don't remember any other coaching changes... we added Chud, but he didn't replace anyone. (Edit: Forgot we lost Goodwin with Arians.)

 

If you have a particular defense of Joe Gilbert, that would be better than decrying the idea that anyone could possibly think that he's done a less than adequate job. Of all the units on this team, offensive line has been the worst, the least consistent, has seemed to go backward at times, and it could be argued that there's been little to no development of the players he's had to coach. I'm not one who calls for anyone to be fired, but it's not hard to believe that we could do better than Gilbert at this point.

Maybe so but to automatically fire someone it takes more than us shade tree coaches to do it? (sarcasm)  How do we know what Gilbert can and can't do. He has had the position for one season. He was in charge of a line that helped Luck get a couple of TDs and a yard or two? Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all you want to do is argue find someone else. Gilbert and every coach is reassessed at the end of every year. Standard procedure. Just because you think he should be fired don't automatically make it a correct call. If you would be so kind as to reread your comment it stated to fire the o-line coach. Your own words.

 

Don't come along questioning my statement and then when I respond you tell me I'm arguing with you.      I didn't approach you, you bought your question over to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all you want to do is argue find someone else. Gilbert and every coach is reassessed at the end of every year. Standard procedure. Just because you think he should be fired don't automatically make it a correct call. If you would be so kind as to reread your comment it stated to fire the o-line coach. Your own words.

 

 

I don't want this to come out the wrong way, but it's a forum where people(including myself) state their opinions.  No matter how reasoned any of us sound, none of us really know in the first place because we do not have privy to what the coaches are really thinking.  We can only speculate the great majority of the time.   My statement is my statement, it doesn't have to be truth for you. If you feel Gilbert doesn't need to be fired I'm fine with that stance as well.  It's your stance and I won't hold you back from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe so but to automatically fire someone it takes more than us shade tree coaches to do it? (sarcasm)  How do we know what Gilbert can and can't do. He has had the position for one season. He was in charge of a line that helped Luck get a couple of TDs and a yard or two? Just saying.

 

He's had the job for two seasons. And in those two seasons, the product hasn't been very good. Not that it's all his fault, but I think you can see why he'd be under scrutiny.

 

And the line coach has little to nothing to do with Luck's production. That's a serious stretch.

 

Obviously, none of us know anything. But a message board isn't just a cheerleading section. We have opinions, and that's okay. Some people run around screaming about how everyone needs to be fired and everyone sucks, and those are the people who should probably be challenged. But when someone who generally doesn't do that says "yeah, he's not doing such a good job," I don't think that's the time to get huffy. You don't have to agree with him, but krunk isn't waving around a two-sided battle axe trying to cut everyone down. Neither am I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I did was quote your own words and questioned you about your comment. That's all. You said fired ....

 

 

It's not that you may not agree with my statement on Gilbert being fired, my point of contention was saying that I call for everybody to be fired and it's rare that I call for any of the coaching staff to be fired.  I might say a certain player could perform better than another based on XYZ, or other things but I don't call for coaches to be fired very much at all.

 

I'll leave it at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is definitely an issue. So, either Ballard is A.) Cheap and he doesn't want to spend money on FAs (even with injuries happening) or B.) He can't build a competitive enough team to attract any worthwhile FA's after 7 going on 8 years now.    If AR and the current team can't attract FAs that could theoretically get a starting job at the S position for a year, then we are in big trouble according to the opinions of the players of the NFL. Personally, I think Ballard just avoids FA so much that he doesn't want to bring outside help in. He wants to be known as the GM who builds his team from the draft.   Wish the local media would call him out on this.
    • I think the Colts have the money to be competitive for a good free agent safety.  I think bringing in one of them may depend on whether a player like Simmons wants to play for the Colts.  They may be hoping to sign for a team with a better chance of making the playoffs.   So I don’t know if Ballard is making a statement or not?     Hope my answer makes sense to you….    
    • I believe he knows that offense is more important than defense.  And that an offense that controls the ball keeps our average defense rested.   I really can’t answer your second sentence until camp.  So let me ask you, as of right now isn’t Ballard saying there are no FA DBs (depth or starting safety) that we can afford who are better than what we have?   If he doesn’t bring someone is, that’s his stance, right?   The logic is that our O will put up enough that we can get by with an average D, IMHO.   Like I said, I’m being Mr. Obvious.      
    • The Jets completely shut down CJ Stroud last year. Their defense is elite, and they had 3 of the top CBs in the league. Pass rush and secondary is how you shut him down. We have the former. I'll be curious how the latter does for us this year.
    • Im trying to make sure I understand you.      You don’t think Ballard is actually trying to build only an average defense, do you?      He’s trying to build as good of a defense as he can.    Are we on the same page, or am I misunderstanding you?  
  • Members

    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 4,296

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,213

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,516

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,532

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,888

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 609

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,464

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tore

      Tore 20

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 244

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...