Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Michael Strahans Sack Record


Narcosys

  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Was Strahan 'gifted' the sack record

    • Yes
      9
    • No
      10


Recommended Posts

After reading this article:

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/10366508/michael-strahan-responds-warren-sapp-criticism-hall-fame-candidacy

 

i decided to look at Strahans record setting sack on Brett Favre.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C2W62HNNsc

 

Strahan, for the entire game, was shut down until the final seconds of the Packer win over the Giants.  All favre had to do was hand off or take a knee. 

 

Then there is this article.

 

http://espn.go.com/columns/kreidler/1307290.html

 

Where all evidence points to a called run play to the left away from strahan.  It is interesting, and many of you probably have already seen this.  But some may not.  What is the opinion around here.

 

Was Strahan 'gifted' the sack record?  My opinion....very suspicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen the play in a long time but when I did see it I saw Favre just kind of turn and see a DE coming off the edge and just go down.  That's no different than what Peyton would do when he realized the other team's pass rusher had him.  With that said I saw it once and didn't much attention to see if the Packers line tried to block him or not.  Frankly I remember seeing it and thinking Favre just wanted to avoid getting blasted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, I think it was a 'gift'. But in the end, to break a record there are always 'gimmie' plays. Sometimes its an easy sack, or an easy rushing td, or and easy passing td. Sometimes its the last one (like Strahan) sometimes its the one in the middle etc. It doesn't take away from the accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, I think it was a 'gift'. But in the end, to break a record there are always 'gimmie' plays. Sometimes its an easy sack, or an easy rushing td, or and easy passing td. Sometimes its the last one (like Strahan) sometimes its the one in the middle etc. It doesn't take away from the accomplishment.

Im not saying he didnt deserve to get it, but saying he may not have truly earned it.  But i dont think anyone gifted Gastineau a sack like Strahan had.  Theres a difference between a 'gimmie' play...and a literal handing of.  Especially if its the one you NEED to break the record.  Strahan couldnt get it done the entire game until that final play.  Favres whole line said it was a run play, thats why the TE was  run blocking.  Favre got up and gave the ball to him and laughed and shook his hand and all.  He joked before the game that he would give him the sack if the Packers were winning at the end.  It may have been a joke...but he actually did it.  Jared Allen also earned all 22 of his sacks.

 

If he truly did give it to him...its a disgrace to the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not saying he didnt deserve to get it, but saying he may not have truly earned it.  But i dont think anyone gifted Gastineau a sack like Strahan had.  Theres a difference between a 'gimmie' play...and a literal handing of.  Especially if its the one you NEED to break the record.  Strahan couldnt get it done the entire game until that final play.  Favres whole line said it was a run play, thats why the TE was  run blocking.  Favre got up and gave the ball to him and laughed and shook his hand and all.  He joked before the game that he would give him the sack if the Packers were winning at the end.  It may have been a joke...but he actually did it.  Jared Allen also earned all 22 of his sacks.

 

If he truly did give it to him...its a disgrace to the game.

 

Im not saying it wasn't gifted to him. It was. 

 

Im just sayin a few mistakes here and there go a long way to earning any sort of record. Whether the mistake was intentional or not, the results were the same. Im sure Allen and Gastinue had a few mistakes go there way as well. Were they intentional or as blatant as this one? Probably not...But if Allen/Gastinue had 6 'mistakes' given to them in a season and Strahan only had 4 'mistakes' given to him in a season, did Strahan not deserve it more? This is just a hypothetical of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not saying it wasn't gifted to him. It was. 

 

Im just sayin a few mistakes here and there go a long way to earning any sort of record. Whether the mistake was intentional or not, the results were the same. Im sure Allen and Gastinue had a few mistakes go there way as well. Were they intentional or as blatant as this one? Probably not...But if Allen/Gastinue had 6 'mistakes' given to them in a season and Strahan only had 4 'mistakes' given to him in a season, did Strahan not deserve it more? This is just a hypothetical of course. 

Isnt every sack a mistake on someone?  Again, he deserved to get it...but he also should have earned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a lot of sacks where the QB just runs out of bounds for a loss/no gain and the closest defender gets a sack on his stat sheet. Robert Mathis had like 2-3 of those this year. So the Strahan one doesn't bother me

 

Not the same thing. I think people are more upset about Favre calling a pass play when one didn't need to be ran and falling down just to give him the record. He had no intention of throwing a pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's well documented that Favre gave it up for Strahan.

 

Not sure whether that matters, as it pertains to his HOF candidacy, and I'm not sure what Warren Sapp's problem is. Strahan was the real deal, one of the best of his generation, with or without that single season record. A half dozen double digit sack seasons, and if you take away the gifted sack, he's still half a sack behind the all time single season sacks record, which ain't too shabby. If your best argument against Strahan is that he was gifted the sacks record, then he should probably be in the HOF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still a gimme sack either way

 

Well yeah, that's kind of what people are upset (for lack of a better word) about. He was gifted a record he shouldn't have earned.

 

Gimmie sacks happen all the time, but this play was ran for the sole purpose of giving him the record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Again….   McGinn didn’t do the damage to Mitchell.  The scouts did.     And there are columnists like McGinn at every major paper.  Their job is to gather info and report it, whether it’s popular or not.    Let me turn this around.  Hypothetically, a few years from now if Mitchell doesn’t pan out and he’s moody and difficult to deal with and he’s a bust, then the scouts will have been proven correct.  And people here will say McGinn’s column was spot on.   Another person who should’ve handled his business better is Mitchell himself.  He’s been living with this since he was roughly 16.   And scouts said he interviewed badly with them.   Even Mitchell admits it.     I don’t think this is as black and white as it seems to you.      To be clear…. I love Mitchell.  Glad we drafted him.  I’ve said several times that Ballard defending him draft night was smart and scored points with the kid.  Now he comes out and says that exact thing.  He appreciates that Ballard defended him so hard and he wants to pay the Colts and Ballard back by being the best player he can be.   
    • I’d say those teams that lost had worse defenses compared to the winners. That’s not to say that their defenses were bad, they just weren’t as clutch in the big moment.    To me, defense matters a whole lot when you need a stop or a momentum change.    Look at all of the star studded power offense teams of the last decade who were incapable of winning it all. 
    • Oops that’s my mistake. Yeah I completely missed that. My apologies.   But yeah he’s one I would keep an eye on for us next year. Him and Will Johnson. It’s a little early to be talking about what the Colts would do in the draft, but I would put money on this being the year Ballard takes a DB high. I could also see him go D-Line again. I love college football and watch as much of it as I can, but I’ll be paying attention to a lot of the guys you listed at those positions. Last season I watched a lot of the teams that had the elite receivers (Washington, Texas, LSU, FSU, etc…).   I’m also getting ready to fire my draft podcasts I listen to back up and look at summer scouting. I’ll come back for some discussions as I get info as I always enjoy talking prospects with you.
    • The issue some may have is the kind of journalism where Bob McGinn created an article that affected a young man's career based solely upon anonymous sources.   I'm confident you will reply back referring to your experience as a journalist with some version of 'without anonymous sources, there would be no journalism'. I value reading your insight about how sports are covered and I don't disagree that anonymous sources can be important. Its fair for anonymous sources to give background about things they are not comfortable saying out loud.   However, I'll add that perhaps its also fair for Bob McGinn to use his anonymous sources to help him find the story and craft the story, but if nobody will put their name on it then Bob McGinn needs to dig deeper before he launches infotainment into the world. He can't take back the damage he did to AD Mitchell.    
    • So damn classy as always. I still rewatch their pandemic golf game from 2020. They just have awesome chemistry together. Hopefully they can get Tom on the Manningcast again for more hilarity.  
  • Members

    • Archer

      Archer 1,801

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,538

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,836

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chrisaaron1023

      Chrisaaron1023 4,472

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 869

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,518

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,068

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 704

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...