oldunclemark Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Chargers Danny Woodhead carried off with an injury at Buffalo Hurt the week before was starter Ryan Matthews ...Its down to Donald Brown! he wont let you down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Chargers Danny Woodhead carried off with an injury at BuffaloHurt the week before was starter Ryan Matthews...Its down to Donald Brown! he wont let you down.he ran it 31 times for 62 yards. Not a real great game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Man. If Trent had the game Brown did. This forum would be on fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 he ran it 31 times for 62 yards. Not a real great gameThe Chargers best rushing performance came in week 1......Ryan Matthews....12 rush for 40 yards, Not sure what the problem could be because I have not watched any of there games but nobody has been able to run this season on that team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 The Chargers best rushing performance came in week 1......Ryan Matthews....12 rush for 40 yards, Not sure what the problem could be because I have not watched any of there games but nobody has been able to run this season on that teamLol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 2 YPC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted September 22, 2014 Author Share Posted September 22, 2014 he ran it 31 times for 62 yards. Not a real great game did he fumble?... Did they win? Freeney and Conner were good, too 'Indy West' is 2-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 did he fumble?... Did they win?Freeney and Conner were good, too'Indy West' is 2-131 for 62 isn't good. They won in spite of their poor running game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruksak Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 31 for 62 isn't good. They won in spite of their pour running gameThat's a mammoth amount of carries. As in....old school Emmitt Smith amount of carries. Not quite Emmitt Smith yards, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B~Town Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 31 a game he will not last long at that pace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted September 22, 2014 Author Share Posted September 22, 2014 31 a game he will not last long at that pace since the other 2 backs are hurt..he probably will Woodhead may be hurt seriously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 did he fumble?... Did they win?Freeney and Conner were good, too'Indy West' is 2-1 So if you're a RB and you don't fumble, and your team wins, you had a good game? That would mean Richardson had like 8 good games last season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B~Town Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 since the other 2 backs are hurt..he probably willWoodhead may be hurt seriouslyHe's missed time in 09 10 and 12 only getting 100ish carries he's not built for 30 carries a game he'll be carted off sooner than later at that pace . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 did he fumble?... Did they win?Freeney and Conner were good, too'Indy West' is 2-1Don't embarass yourself. It was a bad game. It's okay to admit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Indy Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 So if you're a RB and you don't fumble, and your team wins, you had a good game? That would mean Richardson had like 8 good games last season... For arguments sake, that's about 1/2 of the criteria for a good game from a RB standpoint. Don't FumbleGet 100 YardsGet a TouchdownWin Game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 For arguments sake, that's about 1/2 of the criteria for a good game from a RB standpoint. Don't FumbleGet 100 YardsGet a TouchdownWin Game You can get a 100 yards and have a bad game, you can fall short and still have a good game (is 95 yards on 12 carries better or worse than 105 yards on 25 carries?) You can get a TD on a goal line carry, and do nothing else (like Richardson on virtually all of his TDs last season). Your team can win with you doing nothing to contribute. I hate fumbles, but you can even fumble and still have a good game. Long story short, Donald Brown didn't have a good game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Indy Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 You can get a 100 yards and have a bad game, you can fall short and still have a good game (is 95 yards on 12 carries better or worse than 105 yards on 25 carries?) You can get a TD on a goal line carry, and do nothing else (like Richardson on virtually all of his TDs last season). Your team can win with you doing nothing to contribute. I hate fumbles, but you can even fumble and still have a good game. Long story short, Donald Brown didn't have a good game. I'm sorry, my post was more in jest. Depends. 105 yards on 25 carries is great, if you're looking to eat up the clock and control the game. (3.8ypc and up is considered good in my book) If Richardson was turning in 100 yard games on 25-30 carries I'd be ok with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 I'm sorry, my post was more in jest. Depends. 105 yards on 25 carries is great, if you're looking to eat up the clock and control the game. (3.8ypc and up is considered good in my book) If Richardson was turning in 100 yard games on 25-30 carries I'd be ok with that. I didn't quite pick up the jest, but that's cool. I'm not knocking 105 yards on 25 carries, but I'd rather have 95 yards on 12 carries. Even though it's not 100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted September 22, 2014 Author Share Posted September 22, 2014 31 caries..62 yards...5 catches 27 yards No fumbles ....team wins a road game against an undefeated team I'm okay with that...aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Indy Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 I didn't quite pick up the jest, but that's cool. I'm not knocking 105 yards on 25 carries, but I'd rather have 95 yards on 12 carries. Even though it's not 100. I'm not disagreeing with you. One is more effective running, however there are situations where 105 on 25 would be better than 95 on 12. Neither is really a bad day running though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 31 caries..62 yards...5 catches 27 yardsNo fumbles ....team wins a road game against an undefeated teamI'm okay with that...aren't you?Of course you are lol. Because reality is a much harsher environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girlzarefanstoo Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 Of course you are lol. Because reality is a much harsher environment.Reality is we lost about 1/2 of our offense between Mathews and Woodhead so coming away with a win, on the road early east coast game against a previously undefeated team is a good thing. Not happy with 2 yards per carry, but our offense was playing conservative, time-eating ball and trusting the D. As a fan, I'm not a fan of that approach, I want to see our O be explosive - but getting the win? That's all that matters. Now Tom Telesco has to go and get us some help, our rookies show some promise but aren't ready to take on the load. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 Reality is we lost about 1/2 of our offense between Mathews and Woodhead so coming away with a win, on the road early east coast game against a previously undefeated team is a good thing. Not happy with 2 yards per carry, but our offense was playing conservative, time-eating ball and trusting the D. As a fan, I'm not a fan of that approach, I want to see our O be explosive - but getting the win? That's all that matters.Now Tom Telesco has to go and get us some help, our rookies show some promise but aren't ready to take on the load.As a team it was a good game, but Donald didn't have a good game. It's not a big deal. Everyone has a bad game. But OP is acting like Brown didn't struggle, and he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now