Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Big “What If”


Recommended Posts

What if, somehow, Jim Irsay had managed to successfully keep Peyton Manning and draft Andrew Luck?

 

I saw a graphic that compared how long ago every NFL team has started a rookie QB. Colts of course did it last year with Richardson. And with Luck. And with Manning.

 

Packers haven’t started a rookie QB since like the 80s.

 

Imagine if the Colts had let Luck learn from Peyton for at least a year or two, like Rodgers did with Favre.

 

Whether it was Polian, Grigson, or Ballard, let’s assume the staff could put together a team good enough for either QB to win. After all, the Grigson Colts with Luck beat the Manning Broncos. In the Playoffs.

 

But for the sake of argument, let’s say Irsay and whatever staff he chooses re-sign Manning, draft Luck, and then actually build an OLine to protect this thrice-in-a-lifetime QB passing-of-the-torch. Manning-to-Luck joining Favre-to-Rodgers and Montana-to-Young as the top-three greatest runs of QB play in the history of the NFL.

 

The careers of both Manning and Luck might have lasted longer with even more accolades. The 2010s coulda, shoulda, and woulda been the Colts decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not, but this hypothetical was a pretty real scenario for a while in the spring of 2012 before we let Manning go. Quite a bit of debate happened on this very idea. 
 

In hindsight, I’d still have to say it was for the best for Peyton. I don’t think he would’ve made it to two more Super Bowls, let alone winning another one with us. Denver was stacked and primed. All they needed was a QB to guide them. We were the opposite. We needed a total rebuild.

 

As for Luck? I could see where him sitting would’ve benefited, but would he have learned to take less hits? 
 

His rookie year was phenomenal. We went 11-5 and made the playoffs. At the time, it really felt like everything was working out for both Peyton and the Colts… 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Considering that Manning's neck issue was an issue, I don't see it.  I believe that the Colts had a genuine concern regarding it. If they didn't why not trade the Luck pick for a boatload of picks, or picks and player(s) to make another Superbowl run, or two, with Manning? In retrospect, and disregarding Luck's early retirement, I believe that the Colts were setting themselves up for the future...it is a shame how it all played out. Happy for PM that he won another SB though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

What if, somehow, Jim Irsay had managed to successfully keep Peyton Manning and draft Andrew Luck?

 

I saw a graphic that compared how long ago every NFL team has started a rookie QB. Colts of course did it last year with Richardson. And with Luck. And with Manning.

 

Packers haven’t started a rookie QB since like the 80s.

 

Imagine if the Colts had let Luck learn from Peyton for at least a year or two, like Rodgers did with Favre.

 

Whether it was Polian, Grigson, or Ballard, let’s assume the staff could put together a team good enough for either QB to win. After all, the Grigson Colts with Luck beat the Manning Broncos. In the Playoffs.

 

But for the sake of argument, let’s say Irsay and whatever staff he chooses re-sign Manning, draft Luck, and then actually build an OLine to protect this thrice-in-a-lifetime QB passing-of-the-torch. Manning-to-Luck joining Favre-to-Rodgers and Montana-to-Young as the top-three greatest runs of QB play in the history of the NFL.

 

The careers of both Manning and Luck might have lasted longer with even more accolades. The 2010s coulda, shoulda, and woulda been the Colts decade.

Luck would have had more time to go Snowboarding and quit earlier.....   :worms:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If I were to guess it’s probably somewhere in the middle of the two sites.  I value PFF but I also value NFL.com bc it’s close to coming from the horse’s mouth. I’ve seen others saying certain pressures shouldn’t count but not sure discounting situations that happened is a good method.  The Colts sack numbers were at an all time high and I believe it’s bc they were a good line. With Partridge and the 1st round pick, this line could very well be great this year. 
    • Shane is the head coach. He has evaluated all personnel, with his offensive and defensive coaching staff. Gus and his staff would have to give, within a degree of certainty, belief that Cross is ready to be the FS starter. If there were any hesitation, belief, or glaring concern otherwise Shane and Gus would have to go to Ballard and pressure him to fill that position.  Ballard would have the usual counter of wait for camp, bringing someone in now basically hampers Cross from ever panning out, sitting on the bench.    I think Ballard will do what he has in the past, he will bring in high potential, decent experience guys, with teams that have abundance of safety camp rosters at cut downs. As GM he has to have a list of potential releases he is targeting, or his staff isn't doing their jobs. Free Agent safety's were abundant this off season, just because some were signed doesn't mean they will automatically make the teams that scooped them up.
    • Agreed, that’s the thing about these stats is that the compilers have their own definitions.  We have to take all the data we can, and then use what our eyes tell us.   Our pressure may be 38% according to that site, but when you take out things like when the QB holds the ball too long, then its probably closer to that 19%, which is what I believe.     Me personally, I consider actual pressure when we hurry the QB within that 1-3 second drop back mark.  And honestly, 19% seems more plausible given my definition of pressure.  That’s why despite recording a team record high sacks, I still wasn’t a believer in our pass rush.   On my personal draft board for the first pick, I had Dallas Turner as one of the 5 I’d like for us to get (didn’t think Latu would drop to us, thought he was going to the Falcons probably).  Before and during the off-season, also wanted us to grab DE.  Seems the team saw what I saw as well. 
    • Because if they dont think his potential will be better than Sam why keep a worse player?  These guys went undrafted for a reason.  While you do find a gem once in a while, and that could happen here, it doesn’t happen very often.  
    • I think "the best" would have to include potential   If Sam is capped or his BEST is to be QB3..... FOR THIS YEAR, why not give someone else a try?  
  • Members

    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,167

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,798

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,405

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Trace Pyott

      Trace Pyott 318

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 205

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,586

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 166

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 140

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DZS13

      DZS13 13

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...