Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Winning NFL free agency often doesn't translate into wins


NannyMcafee

Recommended Posts

https://www.google.com/amp/www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-winning-nfl-free-agency-does-not-translate-wins-20170306-story,amp.html

 

This is why Ballard is taking the approach that he is in drafting first and only signing smaller FA talent and up and coming starters like Simon from the Texans last year. The logic is free agents aren’t meant to build your team. They’re more like stop gap players until you can find a suitable replacement. 

 

Whats worse than listening to a bunch of complainers talking about how Ballard has failed his first two drafts, and hasn’t signed an worthy FAs? 

 

Watching Ballard sign a bunch of FAs and put us back into cap hell, and lose Andrews entire career to mediocre team play. All to please the fans that didn’t have the patience to wait until the end of season two to complain about lack of FA signings and the current draft class. I would rather listen to the media bash the Colts with their horrible knowledge of our team. At least they’re quite amusing and need to generate views. But to listen to fans complain before season two has even started is honestly giving the media a run for their money! 

 

Keep it up guys with the irrational line of thinking. I’m going to enjoy my koolaid and enjoy this season regardless of what happens because baby it’s officially FOOTBALL SEASON! 

 

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Nanny for the logic. Ballard will get a 2-3 important FA pieces to fill in the cracks when the time is right. That will be appropriate and easier when we look like we are close to a contender.
 It is quite pathetic how so many here have not a clue. 
Reich will build an offense that is very diverse. But it will take more than this season to get so much youth to be able to read and react in concert with Lucky at a SB level. 
 It is time to patiently watch these kids compete and to get better.

And the first half of this season SHOULD be very rough.    :colts:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People will come in and try and talk about the Jaguars or Broncos from 3-4 years ago but those teams built through the draft first. The core players were all drafted. Jacksonville had like 4 Top 5 picks in a 5 year span. Denver had guys like Von Miller, Malik Jackson, Derek Wolfe, Chris Harris Jr. (UDFA), Demaryius Thomas, etc... who they all drafted.

 

You can’t buy a contender. You have to build it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does it have to be one or the other?  If a player is available, and signing/drafting that player helps your team, why should it matter where they came from?  Draft picks are cheaper, but filling a whole roster with players on a rookie deal is unrealistic.

 

What is the real difference between signing a player from free agency and resigning a current player that has reached the end of their deal with the Colts?  If they're past their rookie deal, they should still be considered free agents in my eyes.  They just chose to re-sign with the same team.

 

28 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

People will come in and try and talk about the Jaguars or Broncos from 3-4 years ago but those teams built through the draft first. The core players were all drafted. Jacksonville had like 4 Top 5 picks in a 5 year span. Denver had guys like Von Miller, Malik Jackson, Derek Wolfe, Chris Harris Jr. (UDFA), Demaryius Thomas, etc... who they all drafted.

 

You can’t buy a contender. You have to build it.

Denver had Manning, Sanders, Talib, Ware, Vasquez, Darian Stewart, TJ Ward, Vernon Davis, Owen Daniels, Brandon Marshall...

 

Jacksonville has Norwell, Campbell, Jackson, Dareus, Bouye, Gipson, Church, Moncreif, Jermey Parnell...

 

To say these teams built through the draft more than they built through free agency is stretching the truth a little bit.  They hit on the draft for a few years in a row which got them a bunch of real cheap playmakers, and this allowed them to use ridiculous amounts of CAP space on getting the best free agents.  The draft got them in a great position, but free agency took them over the edge.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

we had money to spend though, and not many players due for a big contract

 

there were guys out there that could have helped short term, without hurting us long term

 

The point is you want to build a dynasty. And to build a dynasty you need clean slate players from the draft, ready to buy in to your organization. Ballard has mentioned it once or twice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, That Guy said:

Why does it have to be one or the other?  If a player is available, and signing/drafting that player helps your team, why should it matter where they came from?  Draft picks are cheaper, but filling a whole roster with players on a rookie deal is unrealistic.

 

What is the real difference between signing a player from free agency and resigning a current player that has reached the end of their deal with the Colts?  If they're past their rookie deal, they should still be considered free agents in my eyes.  They just chose to re-sign with the same team.

 

Denver had Manning, Sanders, Talib, Ware, Vasquez, Darian Stewart, TJ Ward, Vernon Davis, Owen Daniels, Brandon Marshall...

 

Jacksonville has Norwell, Campbell, Jackson, Dareus, Bouye, Gipson, Church, Moncreif, Jermey Parnell...

 

To say these teams built through the draft more than they built through free agency is stretching the truth a little bit.  They hit on the draft for a few years in a row which got them a bunch of real cheap playmakers, and this allowed them to use ridiculous amounts of CAP space on getting the best free agents.  The draft got them in a great position, but free agency took them over the edge.

 

Oh c'mon ya know how this forum is.  It's black or white no gray.  Either you are a supporter or a hater. 

 

Objective thought? Oh boy watch out you are about to awaken the masses. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jay Kirk said:

May I ask do you not believe there is talent on this team besides Luck ?

Of course there is a few others. But probably not enough and certainly lacking in playmakers outside of TY and potentially Mack.

 

Do you like our WR group besides TY ?

Do you like our RB group? 

 

How about our RT situation?

 

Our pass rushers?

Our LB corps?

How about our CB's.

 

How many of our position groups are on par with the better teams? Or even average teams? 

How many position groups will give us an ADVANTAGE over our opponents on the field?

 

The inside of our OL should be ok if not good. 

Our TE's should be decent.

If our Safeties can stay healthy, and thats a Big If, it can be a strenght in a other wise a potentially bad defense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Of course there is a few others. But probably not enough and certainly lacking in playmakers outside of TY and potentially Mack.

 

Do you like our WR group besides TY ?

Do you like our RB group? 

 

How about our RT situation?

 

Our pass rushers?

Our LB corps?

How about our CB's.

 

How many of our position groups are on par with the better teams? Or even average teams? 

How many position groups will give us an ADVANTAGE over our opponents on the field?

 

The inside of our OL should be ok if not good. 

Our TE's should be decent.

If our Safeties can stay healthy, and thats a Big If, it can be a strenght in a other wise a potentially bad defense.

 

 

To early to tell ask me around week five and I will tell you what I like and don't like. Inexperienced yes ,lacking talent maybe. Time will settle that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, That Guy said:

Why does it have to be one or the other?  If a player is available, and signing/drafting that player helps your team, why should it matter where they came from?  Draft picks are cheaper, but filling a whole roster with players on a rookie deal is unrealistic.

 

What is the real difference between signing a player from free agency and resigning a current player that has reached the end of their deal with the Colts?  If they're past their rookie deal, they should still be considered free agents in my eyes.  They just chose to re-sign with the same team.

 

Denver had Manning, Sanders, Talib, Ware, Vasquez, Darian Stewart, TJ Ward, Vernon Davis, Owen Daniels, Brandon Marshall...

 

Jacksonville has Norwell, Campbell, Jackson, Dareus, Bouye, Gipson, Church, Moncreif, Jermey Parnell...

 

To say these teams built through the draft more than they built through free agency is stretching the truth a little bit.  They hit on the draft for a few years in a row which got them a bunch of real cheap playmakers, and this allowed them to use ridiculous amounts of CAP space on getting the best free agents.  The draft got them in a great position, but free agency took them over the edge.

You’re missing the point. Those teams had a core of pro-Bowl levels players they drafted first. Denver had drafted players at key positions. They then used FA to fill in the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It just seems like people have sold themselves the idea he was going to come out great this season which I think is and was completely unreasonable.   I hope to see some improvement by the end of the season, but I really don't expect a whole lot until sometime next season. AR has got so much catching up to do.   I mean, there's no doubt AR's struggles are affecting MPJ, but MPJ has never been a great separater and seeing a defender right besides MPJ is probably stopping AR from throwing his way at this point.   Also, to be clear, I'm not saying AR will DEFINITELY be great, but I do think we DEFINITELY don't know yet and people need to be a lot more patient with him.
    • They both couldn’t throw or work on footwork. To ignore this could be a possibility with AR is naive. Let’s see where he is by game 7. Especially when it looks like he went backwards  from last season.
    • Other than the fact that Luck was a proven NFL QB in his prime and that his shoulder rehab lasted 3x as long.   
    • His lack of experience was a well-known risk in drafting him and it's a big reason why some were skeptical (including me). On the flip side, it sort of seemed like people disregarded his lack of experience then in favor of things like potential and upside. But now he's struggling and it's showing. If anything, it's validated those initial concerns.   I tend to think WR drops following a QB from college to the NFL says as much about the QB as it does the pass catchers. But they need to do better. I think it will take a combination of improvements from both AR and the pass catchers.   Not sure if something is up with MPJ, but some "regression" this year was very predictable. At one point, I actually thought he might leave in FA when faced with prospect of re-signing with a run-first team and a young QB who is still learning how to throw short and intermediate passes (the area he operates). But he stayed...and I am glad he did. But if it continues, there are going to be a lot of people blaming MPJ, which is pretty ridiculous, when you think about just 6 months ago, people were talking about how great of a contract it was and that MPJ was a legit WR1 with AR.  
    • Last week,Rams home game, Sofi looked like a 49ers home game. Dallas and Vegas are that way too.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...