Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NFL salary cap for 2014 projected at $126.3m


Superman

Recommended Posts

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2013/12/11/2104-nfl-salary-cap/3994927/

 

This isn't a final number, won't be finalized until right before the 2014 league year begins in March. But that's a welcome increase. Being modest, I was expecting $125m. 

 

The Colts number for next year is projected at $87.3m, giving them $38.1m in cap space, according to Spotrac. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2013/12/11/2104-nfl-salary-cap/3994927/

This isn't a final number, won't be finalized until right before the 2014 league year begins in March. But that's a welcome increase. Being modest, I was expecting $125m.

The Colts number for next year is projected at $87.3m, giving them $38.1m in cap space, according to Spotrac.

We get more from cutting and letting players walk right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get more from cutting and letting players walk right?

 

Depends on who we cut, and when. We'd get $4m from cutting Satele, but it would cost us $500k if we cut Landry (just a for instance).

 

We don't get anything more from letting players walk. This figure is prior to us re-signing any of our pending free agents. So part of that $38m will be used to keep our own guys, assuming we do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on who we cut, and when. We'd get $4m from cutting Satele, but it would cost us $500k if we cut Landry (just a for instance).

We don't get anything more from letting players walk. This figure is prior to us re-signing any of our pending free agents. So part of that $38m will be used to keep our own guys, assuming we do so.

Yeah ik your pretty good with the cap stuff I'm not at all so I ask others lol if we were to cut Toler and satele wat would our cap be?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that the higher the cap the higher players wage expectations will be, correct?

 

There's seriously no telling. Last offseason was just weird, and the cap went up a bit more than people expected it to. But a lot of players that were assumed to get big money didn't get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on who we cut, and when. We'd get $4m from cutting Satele, but it would cost us $500k if we cut Landry (just a for instance).

 

We don't get anything more from letting players walk. This figure is prior to us re-signing any of our pending free agents. So part of that $38m will be used to keep our own guys, assuming we do so.

 

 

So looking at Spotrac and each guys salary, what do you do to figure out what we'd save by cutting them? It looks like you just take their cap hit and subtract the dead money portion to see what we save or sacrifice by cutting someone. For instance cutting RJF (not that I want to), would result in us gaining 1 mil in cap space?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So looking at Spotrac and each guys salary, what do you do to figure out what we'd save by cutting them? It looks like you just take their cap hit and subtract the dead money portion to see what we save or sacrifice by cutting someone. For instance cutting RJF (not that I want to), would result in us gaining 1 mil in cap space?

 

For simple contracts, that's pretty much it. It gets tricky when there's guaranteed salary or other bonuses that come into play.

 

I'm not sure how Spotrac is getting that dead number for RJF's contract. They have him with prorated bonus of $1.875m, so that's the cap penalty. To me, if we were to cut him before 2014, the cap hit would be $1.875m, and we'd save $4.5m against the 2014 cap. If he has guaranteed salary in 2014 that Spotrac is not listing, or if there's a bonus that's been paid or will be paid before the season starts, then that changes. But based on how they've broken down his contract, their dead number is inaccurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the list of unrestricted and restricted free agents that we have.

Pat McAfee - UFA

Pat Angerer - UFA

Antoine Bethea - UFA

Ahmad Bradhsaw - UFA

Sergio Borwn - UFA

Donald Brown - UFA

Tashard Choice - UFA
Vontae Davis - UFA

Kavell Connoer - RFA

Aubrayo Franklin UFA

Josh Gordy - RFA

DHB - UFA

Justin Hickman - ERFA

Cam Johnson - ERFA

Jeff Linkenbach - UFA

Scott Lutrus - RFA

Ricardo Mathews - UFA

Mike McGlynn - UFA

Fili Moala - UFA

Joe Reitz - RFA

Lwerence Sidbury - UFA

Cassius Vaughn - UFA

Adam Vinatieri - UFA

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the list of unrestricted and restricted free agents that we have.

Pat McAfee - UFA

Pat Angerer - UFA

Antoine Bethea - UFA

Ahmad Bradhsaw - UFA

Sergio Borwn - UFA

Donald Brown - UFA

Tashard Choice - UFA

Vontae Davis - UFA

Kavell Connoer - RFA

Aubrayo Franklin UFA

Josh Gordy - RFA

DHB - UFA

Justin Hickman - ERFA

Cam Johnson - ERFA

Jeff Linkenbach - UFA

Scott Lutrus - RFA

Ricardo Mathews - UFA

Mike McGlynn - UFA

Fili Moala - UFA

Joe Reitz - RFA

Lwerence Sidbury - UFA

Cassius Vaughn - UFA

Adam Vinatieri - UFA

I see a lot of guys it would be easy to let walk or re sign at little cost.

The obvious re signs imo are:

McAfee

Sergio Brown

Vontae Davis

Donald Brown could come back on a reasonable deal, Reitz being an RFA gives Indy leverage in keeping him for at least one more year at a reasonable price. I can see Moala being brought back to continue as depth on the d line.

Franklin may be gone depending on if they like what they have seen out of Hughes and Chapman. I dont see how Angerer comes back unless they simply cant find a replacement at ILB. Sidbury may get another shot at playing if the injury is considered a fluke thing. Vinatieri is so old, but still very good, that is a toss up as a re sign, though he could just as easily hang em up after this year.

Everyine else I either think is gone or dont know enough about to project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the list of unrestricted and restricted free agents that we have.

Pat McAfee - UFA

Pat Angerer - UFA

Antoine Bethea - UFA

Ahmad Bradhsaw - UFA

Sergio Borwn - UFA

Donald Brown - UFA

Tashard Choice - UFA

Vontae Davis - UFA

Kavell Connoer - RFA ???

Aubrayo Franklin UFA

Josh Gordy - RFA

DHB - UFA

Justin Hickman - ERFA

Cam Johnson - ERFA

Jeff Linkenbach - UFA

Scott Lutrus - RFA

Ricardo Mathews - UFA

Mike McGlynn - UFA

Fili Moala - UFA

Joe Reitz - RFA

Lwerence Sidbury - UFA

Cassius Vaughn - UFA

Adam Vinatieri - UFA

 

I'd let everyone crossed out walk. Don't let the door hit you...

 

I think Donald Brown will get an offer from a team to be a #2 back, and I think he'll take it. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal for no more than $1.5m. I expect Vinatieri to retire. 

 

I'd tender the RFAs. 

 

I don't think Conner is an RFA, I believe he's a UFA. If he is an RFA, I'd tender him. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal at the tender level.

 

Everyone else, it would just come down to the money. Vontae Davis will get some offers, and I wouldn't want to break the bank for him. I've been saying four years, $30m, and lately that seems rich, given his play. I'd like to keep McAfee, but I don't know whether the front office agrees (they evidently didn't even talk about a long term deal last offseason). The rest of the UFAs that I didn't cross out would be just for depth / special teams value. We can easily replace them and/or live without them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat McAfee - UFAPat Angerer - UFAAntoine Bethea - UFAAhmad Bradhsaw - UFA

Sergio Borwn - UFADonald Brown - UFATashard Choice - UFA

Vontae Davis - UFA

Kavell Connoer - RFA ???

Aubrayo Franklin UFA

Josh Gordy - RFADHB - UFA

Justin Hickman - ERFA

Cam Johnson - ERFA

Jeff Linkenbach - UFAScott Lutrus - RFARicardo Mathews - UFAMike McGlynn - UFA

Fili Moala - UFA

Joe Reitz - RFALwerence Sidbury - UFACassius Vaughn - UFAAdam Vinatieri - UFA

 

I'd let everyone crossed out walk. Don't let the door hit you...

 

I think Donald Brown will get an offer from a team to be a #2 back, and I think he'll take it. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal for no more than $1.5m. I expect Vinatieri to retire. 

 

I'd tender the RFAs. 

 

I don't think Conner is an RFA, I believe he's a UFA. If he is an RFA, I'd tender him. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal at the tender level.

 

Everyone else, it would just come down to the money. Vontae Davis will get some offers, and I wouldn't want to break the bank for him. I've been saying four years, $30m, and lately that seems rich, given his play. I'd like to keep McAfee, but I don't know whether the front office agrees (they evidently didn't even talk about a long term deal last offseason). The rest of the UFAs that I didn't cross out would be just for depth / special teams value. We can easily replace them and/or live without them.

I would consider trying to keep Bradshaw simply because his injury wasn't related to his feet. He should be dirt cheap, but in the end he probably wants to go some where with a less crowded backfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's seriously no telling. Last offseason was just weird, and the cap went up a bit more than people expected it to. But a lot of players that were assumed to get big money didn't get it. 

Prolly cus' teams are figuring out lower tier players are worth more cus' injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider trying to keep Bradshaw simply because his injury wasn't related to his feet. He should be dirt cheap, but in the end he probably wants to go some where with a less crowded backfield.

 

I think he'll want a real shot at a starting spot. Won't get it here, with Ballard and Richardson. 

 

I think we need a couple new backs to compete, someone who can play the scat back role, maybe even return kicks. I just can't see us keeping Bradshaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat McAfee - UFA

Pat Angerer - UFA

Antoine Bethea - UFA

Ahmad Bradhsaw - UFA

Sergio Borwn - UFA

Donald Brown - UFA

Tashard Choice - UFA

Vontae Davis - UFA

Kavell Connoer - RFA ???

Aubrayo Franklin UFA

Josh Gordy - RFA

DHB - UFA

Justin Hickman - ERFA

Cam Johnson - ERFA

Jeff Linkenbach - UFA

Scott Lutrus - RFA

Ricardo Mathews - UFA

Mike McGlynn - UFA

Fili Moala - UFA

Joe Reitz - RFA

Lwerence Sidbury - UFA

Cassius Vaughn - UFA

Adam Vinatieri - UFA

 

I'd let everyone crossed out walk. Don't let the door hit you...

 

I think Donald Brown will get an offer from a team to be a #2 back, and I think he'll take it. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal for no more than $1.5m. I expect Vinatieri to retire. 

 

I'd tender the RFAs. 

 

I don't think Conner is an RFA, I believe he's a UFA. If he is an RFA, I'd tender him. If not, I'd offer him a one year deal at the tender level.

 

Everyone else, it would just come down to the money. Vontae Davis will get some offers, and I wouldn't want to break the bank for him. I've been saying four years, $30m, and lately that seems rich, given his play. I'd like to keep McAfee, but I don't know whether the front office agrees (they evidently didn't even talk about a long term deal last offseason). The rest of the UFAs that I didn't cross out would be just for depth / special teams value. We can easily replace them and/or live without them. 

 

 

What's all this hate on CV about? He's our best corner this year (most picks/huge key for us wrapping up the division agains't the titans). Yes, i'm quite aware he's not starter material, but he (maybe D.B. also) might be the best nickle/dime back in all of football. Man, you guys are blind if you don't see his weekly contributions. Not to mention, he's an awesome return guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's all this hate on CV about? He's our best corner this year (most picks/huge key for us wrapping up the division agains't the titans). Yes, i'm quite aware he's not starter material, but he (maybe D.B. also) might be the best nickle/dime back in all of football. Man, you guys are blind if you don't see his weekly contributions. Not to mention, he's an awesome return guy.

Dont know what youre seeing, but 8/10 times Cassius Vaughn is a liability in coverage because of his inability to turn his head and make a play on the ball despite keeping tight coverage. Hence his nickname "neckbrace".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont know what youre seeing, but 8/10 times Cassius Vaughn is a liability in coverage because of his inability to turn his head and make a play on the ball despite keeping tight coverage. Hence his nickname "neckbrace".

 

 

 That's because he's not a starter...never was. He does have trouble turning, but when he plays inside with the action in front of him, he's a ballhawk. He's our nickle/dime guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's all this hate on CV about? He's our best corner this year (most picks/huge key for us wrapping up the division agains't the titans). Yes, i'm quite aware he's not starter material, but he (maybe D.B. also) might be the best nickle/dime back in all of football. Man, you guys are blind if you don't see his weekly contributions. Not to mention, he's an awesome return guy.

 

I don't want him at corner. He's a liability in coverage, especially if/when he has to cover someone on the outside or step in as a starter. I'd rather fill the roster with players who don't hurt the team when they have to step up into a starter's role.

 

To be honest, I'd rather play him at safety. Like you said, playing with the action in front of him, he plays well. He's a decent tackler. He's an option as a returner (though we could do better). So if we move him to safety and have him as a backup, then that's fine. And he could be depth as a dimeback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-tried-to-trade-up-for-brock-bowers-then-byron-murphy   You seem to be right.
    • Read this this morning. Thought it was interesting    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/indianapolis-colts/news/colts-rams-nfl-draft-trade-offer-revealed-rejected/be019bcd2ee81b6ffeb4656e     "This was the rejected trade offer from the Rams to the Colts in the first round:     Rams get: Nos. 15, 191   Colts get: Nos. 19, 99, 154   While that's the kind of deal Chris Ballard would be expected to take in the past, the Colts clearly had an eye for edge rusher Laiatu Latu.   It's clear that it would have taken much more in the offer for the Colts to move off the chance of selecting the prospect they believe was the best defender in the entire draft.   There were a few viable prospects available at the time so it would have made sense for the Colts to trade back.   But this only proves how convicted they were in draft Latu."     Not too surprised we turnt that down as it has us losing on the draft chart by a little bit, but does show the conviction they had in Latu.
    • Offense wins in the league now and to take it a step further the QB is by far the lost important piece on any team.    So, on offense you need the best possible QB with the best possible supporting cast and on defense you need players who can affect the play of the opposing QBs directly. 
    • This is definitely an issue. So, either Ballard is A.) Cheap and he doesn't want to spend money on FAs (even with injuries happening) or B.) He can't build a competitive enough team to attract any worthwhile FA's after 7 going on 8 years now.    If AR and the current team can't attract FAs that could theoretically get a starting job at the S position for a year, then we are in big trouble according to the opinions of the players of the NFL. Personally, I think Ballard just avoids FA so much that he doesn't want to bring outside help in. He wants to be known as the GM who builds his team from the draft.   Wish the local media would call him out on this.
    • I think the Colts have the money to be competitive for a good free agent safety.  I think bringing in one of them may depend on whether a player like Simmons wants to play for the Colts.  They may be hoping to sign for a team with a better chance of making the playoffs.   So I don’t know if Ballard is making a statement or not?     Hope my answer makes sense to you….    
  • Members

    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,889

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,982

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,532

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DZS13

      DZS13 13

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,537

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,693

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,670

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 11

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 87

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...