Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

colts defensive rankings


coming on strong

Recommended Posts

SF`s Offense was in disarray after the injuries and the beating Seattle put on them. A GREAT week to play them.

NOT the SF team anyone is accustomed to. How fortunate, Again!!

 It`s OK if you think that isn`t true.

The Colts had their share of injury going into that game. So that can't be used for an excuse. 49ers were at home but still got a beatdown. And make no mistake, it was a beatdown. For you it's what the 49ers did and didn't not what the Colts did do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is BECOMING that guy.  I love Mathis just as much as anyone, but when I think of that 1st tier of OLB/DE, I think Suggs, Watt, Wake, Ware, Allen first.  Mathis is 2nd tier to me, not saying he isn't good, but you know what I mean.  But if he continues on his tear, no doubt he will be that leader on defense and around the league.  

He is the guy. He is tied for the lead in sacks with 7,5. He may not get the attention of some other because he don't feel the need to over celebrate very time he makes a play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he not only possesses elite stats but he also passes the eye test and any other test you throw at him... You're arguing that he is not a 1st tier OLB, and i'm asking you why? Everything points to him having already become one. He is with no question our "guy" and out Leader. I honestly don't even know what you're arguing with since Mathis is playing better for his position as a rush 3-4 OLB than everyone not named Justin Houston.

You're basically taking a SMALL sample size and using it to prove your argument which is unfair. I know the stats, but are you gonna really line Mathis up next guys like ware and say he is better than them?

He's not 1st tier(yet) because he hasn't become a disruptive force against the run. When he starts smash ball carriers consistently in the backfield, when we can put him on a tight end and not worry, then he'll be that known force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying smitty but Ware is a liability in coverage so maybe he is not the best example

Every player has their weakness, but even though ware is a liability, dude is a monster in almost all phases of defense. But yeah, ware is a bad example lol. Even though I have seen him get a couple picks and batted passes during my time, he still isn't the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like is how the league and commentators have commented and noticed how the culture is changing. We are becoming a punch you in the face, smash mouth team and I love it. Totally fits my personality. Have always loved the years back NE, steelers and ravens teams. Cause they just beat you up and make you fight for every yard. We just happened to have Manning. Who could surgically dismember a defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

What I like is how the league and commentators have commented and noticed how the culture is changing. We are becoming a punch you in the face, smash mouth team and I love it. Totally fits my personality. Have always loved the years back NE, steelers and ravens teams. Cause they just beat you up and make you fight for every yard. We just happened to have Manning. Who could surgically dismember a defense.

We are basically becoming the NFL version of the Stanford Cardinal.  I'm sure Luck is loving it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every player has their weakness, but even though ware is a liability, dude is a monster in almost all phases of defense. But yeah, ware is a bad example lol. Even though I have seen him get a couple picks and batted passes during my time, he still isn't the best.

Yeah my brother is a Cowboys fan so I watch some games with him and cringe whenever he drops back into pass coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are basically becoming the NFL version of the Stanford Cardinal. I'm sure Luck is loving it.

Well as long as that equals the aggressive smash mouth defenses that the ravens, steelers and ne had if be ok with that. Never really followed Stanford so can't say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're basically taking a SMALL sample size and using it to prove your argument which is unfair. I know the stats, but are you gonna really line Mathis up next guys like ware and say he is better than them?

He's not 1st tier(yet) because he hasn't become a disruptive force against the run. When he starts smash ball carriers consistently in the backfield, when we can put him on a tight end and not worry, then he'll be that known force.

They don't even play the same position(ware and mathis). As a rush OLB he is not asked o cover te's often if at all, and NO 3-4 "rush" backer can be put on a te and consistently cover him... It is a small sample size but its all we have to go by right now... Yes i am telling you that currently in the NFL Robert Mathis of the Colts whom plays the "rush" role in a 3-4 formation is **playing** better than Demarcus Ware of the Cowboys whom plays as a 4-3 DE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the defense as a whole, looking at each position, we really do look solid. And I'm usually critical or hard to please. The front 3 are very solid-at least their play in the past has been very good. I would like to see the opposition yards per carry go down, though. The LBs, at least Mathis on one side and Freeman on the inside are having Pro Bowl years. I would like to see someone step up or us acquire a better ILB to go beside Freeman--I'm not sure about Angerer anymore. And surely one of the 2 OLB's we've invested so much in will pan out (Werner or Walden). Even if just one of those pan out, we will be ok. The CBs have played well. Butler, Toler and Davis make up a good group. With Howell (now injured) showing he has starter ability, we are very well set at safety with him, Bethea and Landry. With one or two more players over the next year or so, this could be an outstanding defense very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're basically taking a SMALL sample size and using it to prove your argument which is unfair. I know the stats, but are you gonna really line Mathis up next guys like ware and say he is better than them?

He's not 1st tier(yet) because he hasn't become a disruptive force against the run. When he starts smash ball carriers consistently in the backfield, when we can put him on a tight end and not worry, then he'll be that known force.

 

As the Rush LB, Mathis will almost always be lined up on the weak side of the offensive formation where there would be no TE, except for in multiple TE sets.  So there would be very few opportunities to line him up in pass coverage against an opposing TE.  Typically, the Rush LB, if in man coverage, would be on a RB or FB I believe.  I do agree that he is still rather weak against the run.  The majority of broken plays to the outside so far this season have come to his side.  

 

 

They don't even play the same position(ware and mathis). As a rush OLB he is not asked o cover te's often if at all, and NO 3-4 "rush" backer can be put on a te and consistently cover him... It is a small sample size but its all we have to go by right now... Yes i am telling you that currently in the NFL Robert Mathis of the Colts whom plays the "rush" role in a 3-4 formation is **playing** better than Demarcus Ware of the Cowboys whom plays as a 4-3 DE. 

 

Ware was an OLB for 8 years before transitioning this year to 4-3 DE, so there is more than ample information to grade him as an OLB in a 3-4 scheme.

 

 

In all, I think you are both kind of right but also both kind of wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Love the addition of Latu. I wanted him and/or the corner who is blazing fast and a man corner (cannot remember his name). I never thought Ballard would pick either because of the injury history for Latu and the other not a zone corner. In reality, the D could be a lot better this year than last. However it may not be reflected in the stats because they play some very good qb's this year. Last year, the D faced horrible qb play and what is alarming is that they actually put up stats near the bottom.  That being said, I cannot see the D being worse than last year if that is comforting, lol?? 
    • We’ll see if it remains average this year.  I think it’s possible, but unlikely.   Put another way,  if the Colts defense is average in 2024 I will be very, Very, VERY disappointed. 
    • I agree with you that he is not trying to build an average defense. It is just a plain fact that after 8 yeas of drafting and free agency, he has managed to do it.
    • Kind of an extreme example, but Jim Irsay specifically praising Bryce Young last year could qualify. In general though, if a team is trying to throw off the scent by floating positive information about other players, that seems harmless. It's different if a team is trashing a player to try to get him to drop into their range, and I don't think that's something that actually happens. If it did, I think that would be highly inappropriate, and I think a good reporter would look back and recognize that their source was using them, and think twice about trusting that source again.     So I think this is way more common than what McGinn did. And I don't think people ignore it, unless it's something they don't want to hear. Most sports reports include some version of 'I've been told...' without naming or directly quoting a source. A lot of those are just fact-based, black/white reports, but that often happens with more opinion-based or viewpoint-based reporting as well.     I don't know if anyone necessarily likes those reports, but I do think we consume them, and are generally influenced by them. Yeah, the substantiated/analytical stuff is way more valuable than a report discussion a potential character issue, but if it has a legitimate foundation -- AD Mitchell does have diabetes, it can be difficult for someone with that condition to control their mood and energy levels -- then I think it should be considered. Ultimately, I know the quality of information I have access to is nowhere near what the teams are getting, so I don't worry too much about it.      Yeah, I fully agree. Ballard faced the media when the Okereke story came out, and it was obvious the team had done their homework. He was firm when asked about Ogletree coming back. The Colts are thorough. Doesn't mean nothing can go wrong once they draft the guy, but I'm confident they've checked all their boxes.    And definitely, I think Ballard 100% meant everything he said, and I have no problem with him saying it. But, I think there's a difference between McGinn's report, and the narrative that came later. I think the report was based on anonymous insights, and the narrative was based on sensational headlines. And I'd say Ballard's comments apply more to the narrative than to the report.
  • Members

    • ColtsLegacy

      ColtsLegacy 1,103

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,162

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 92

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEColtsLover36

      DEColtsLover36 2,116

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,223

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,388

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JMichael557

      JMichael557 499

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tore

      Tore 20

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...