Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Free Agent Focus: Paul Kruger

Andy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Andy Walk On

Andy

Posted
Posted

For the next few days leading up to the start of free agency, I will be breaking down the potential free agents for the Indianapolis Colts. This entry is about Paul Kruger, the unrestricted free agent linebacker for the Baltimore Ravens.

 

 

Overview: Kruger had a strong regular season, but had an even better playoffs and was one of the Ravens' best players. Kruger went from a situational pass rusher, to a 3 down linebacker. He can rush the quarterback as well as any guy on the free agent market, and showed this season that he can do well against the run, recording 42 tackles. Kruger is asking for a lot of money, and will most likely be a free agent departure for the Ravens. 

 

Strengths: As mentioned before, Kruger developed into a very good pass rusher and asserted himself as the starter in Baltimore. He's got a good number of moves and has the strength and agility to beat a lot of right tackles. He's got good size and good athletcism. He plays well as a rush outside linebacker and could even play in coverage too a bit, although I doubt he'll have to do that more than 3 times a game. He and Mathis could make a great tandem. I believe that he's useful when with someone good playing the other OLB spot. He's more of a great compliment than a star linebacker. Very good all around linebacker that could help this team right away.

 

Weaknesses: One of his biggest weaknesses or turn off is that he is asking for a lot of money. He's also unproven. He's only had one good season in the NFL (in his 4 years in the league), which would probably cause some consistency questions. He's not a perennial pro bowler, and I doubt he would be going to many any time soon. That's a bit of a problem because he's asking for pro bowl money. He isn't very consistent on a game level. He has some very good games and then can go silent for the next few. 

 

How he fits in the system: He's a perfect fit in this system. The Colts operate a 3-4 defense and Kruger has played in that his whole career in Baltimore. What also helps is that his former defensive coordinator, Chuck Pagano, is the head coach of the team. They have a good relationship and Krugers knows Pagano's 3-4 the best out of any 3-4 variation. 

 

Final Thoughts: Supposedly, the Colts are in a bidding war for Kruger. I wouldn't necessarily want to overpay for this guy, he's not the type of guy that's worth a huge amount of money, but I would be willing to give a good amount to him. He is very talented and still pretty young; he's got plenty of years ahead of him. He fits in the system which means there will be no transition problems. I would like to see him in a Colts uniform as he could fill a big need, but I wouldn't want to pay more than 9 million (a year on average) for him. We need to keep in mind that he's only had one really good year in the NFL. Another big reason why he'd be good on the Colts is because we could call him and Mathis... Mathis and Kruger, Attorney's at Law. 

 

Grade: (No defensive rankings) Top 12 3-4 Outside Linebacker

 

What I'd Offer him: 3 years, $25 million 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
husker61 Active Roster

husker61

Posted
Posted

i am very skeptical of him. the first half of last year he only had 1.5 sacks. 8 games and playoffs (great against a terrible colt line) just don't do it for me. if he is going to get a big long term contract it would be with someone else. he's way too risky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wig Practice Squad

wig

Posted
Posted

From what I've read it seems the Browns and Colts are the teams in the mix. If the Colts want him, the Browns know they can get an OLB in the draft with their position, we don't have that luxury. I'd say it will come down to how much Pagano believes in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewColtsFan Ring of Honor

NewColtsFan

Posted
Posted

Hope you realize that your offer,  3 years and $25 Mill has less than a zero percent chance of happening.

 

As it stands right now,  a possible offer of 5 years and $40 Mill looks unlikely....

 

All the websites who are projecting where players are going to sign have him signing for 5 years and roughly $10-12 million dollars per year.

 

Just want to make sure we're all on the same page here.....

 

Oh....   otherwise,  nice evaluation....   seriously....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • stitches
      *Update: AD Mitchell signed

      By stitches · Posted

      I agree here. There were legit football reasons for teams to not be in love with Mitchell based on his play and some of his indicators that a lot of people seem to value were not great.  I don't know how to parse what Destin is selling here. I'm not sure you can be certain those reports changed anything in team's evaluation of Mitchell. He's presenting anecdotal evidence that teams starting asking more about his diabetes after those reports. Again... not sure if this is factual or it just was more noticeable after those reports? Who knows...      Let me summarize my view in short -  I don't think the reports are made up. Someone told McGinn those things. There might be some truth to it. To me it looks very one sided. Just go and read the whole thing again,,, the diabetes part, the uncoachable, immaturity part, the combine part(this one we can actually see with our own eyes and I can absolutely tell you the characterization of what happened is preposterous). If a scout under me really had those opinions about what transpired in those drills, I personally would question every single thing he's telling me.     On the other examples of rumors/reports about other players(Caleb, Levis, Stroud) - absolutely, if you are going to disparage the character of any of those players the very least you must do is ask them for a comment. The fact that this practice of just throwing rocks and hiding hands and not even giving the opportunity of the target to respond, is prevalent in today's draft media, doesn't make it right.       
    • Superman
      *Update: AD Mitchell signed

      By Superman · Posted

      I understand where you're coming from. It's not my intention to call out everyone who doesn't like how the AD stuff was handled. It just seems like typical draft season stuff to me, which everyone peddles in every year, but now that it's a highly drafted Colts pick, we're raising the standard.    Wasn't it 'unnamed sources' who claimed Caleb Williams didn't want to play for the Bears, or wanted ownership equity, etc.? Weren't 'unnamed sources' repeated when questions about Levis' personality started to float around? To me, some stuff is either factual, or it's not -- it's a fact that AD has diabetes. Other stuff is opinion/projection -- rude, abrasive, immature, uncoachable -- and should be treated as such.    The AD stuff was a mix of both. He has diabetes, the claim is that it has affected his ability to practice. Either that's true or it's not. I don't find it hard to believe, since AD definitely has diabetes, and that kind of stuff is typical of a young person with that condition. Someone else might view it differently, but we're never going to get anyone to corroborate that stuff on the record. One of the scouts said he has bad character reports from Georgia and Texas, which isn't going to be validated by anyone in the know, but it's hard to imagine someone just making that up. And that scout -- who I think was the harshest -- also said that when AD's blood sugar is right, he's great. So to me, he offered a reasonable explanation, and I don't think he came across as someone who dislikes AD or would have him as a character red flag. I think there was nuance that doesn't get fully considered when this stuff gets repeated.   Even maturity is a spectrum, not a black and white consideration. A person -- especially at a young age -- might be incredibly responsible in one area of their life, while still figuring things out in another area. One person might see something as immature, and another has no problem with it. So a source gave an opinion, and I think it should be treated like one person's opinion, and not a rubber-stamped designation that the monolithic scouting community has agreed upon.   And I don't think that Bob McGinn's collection of quotes from unnamed sources impacts how teams handle their draft board. I think McGinn is getting this stuff from people who work for teams; the teams already have the info. So I don't see the quotes as affecting AD's draft stock. It would have been balanced to offer some counter quotes, if those were available, but I don't think the quotes are as negative as they seem from the headlines.    My only reservations about Ballard's presser is that it seemed like an "outburst," but knowing that he kind of did the same thing last year, I think it was sincere, and he did it for the right reasons. Without that background, he might have come across as being petty and unprofessional, but context is important.   Short version: I don't think the reports are made up, I think there's probably some truth to them. And I assume the Colts did their homework, because that's how they operate. So if they're comfortable with AD Mitchell and have a plan to help him succeed, I have no concerns about it. 
    • ColtStrong2013
      Chris Ballard: Redfining what Success means in the NFL

      By ColtStrong2013 · Posted

      Ability to cover one on one which is what happened... We haven't seen any cornerback play yet this year, so I'll reserve judgment until so. Otherwise we are predicting what is going to happen based on two rookies playing last season. I am more concerned about the depth, as I can't imagine they aren't as well. I was hopeful for Scott bringing serious competition and elevating the secondary. I hope Flowers does that at cornerback. Can always improve though, and there is still plenty of time. I hope Cross becomes our permanent guy and elevates. We have a lot of youth on the backend of this roster. It's obvious the plan is for them to grow. Hopefully we see it out of the gate and consistent growth throughout the season.  I don't see any way the pass rush is not more effective. I don't see the secondary getting worse, far from it. That will help to begin. We added the best pass rusher in the draft. We now have a deep d-line that is going to be rotated heavily, which will lead to fresh bodies bringing pressure, all the way up until the big gal sings her final tune each game.    I may be crazy, but I'm not concerned as much as other's are about the defense. I'm concerned about #5, 11, and 28's health, as I think they drive the offense, which is going to be the difference in the W/L column. If they can stay healthy, and our defense can grow throughout the year, I think we'll be positioned well. Our depth in the trenches is going to be a major advantage over the course of a long season. I believe in Shane Steichen, more than anyone.
    • AwesomeAustin
      2024 NBA, Pacers and all NBA talk

      By AwesomeAustin · Posted

      I saw the media tried to make it out that the Celtics had an easy path to the finals. They went 64-18 during the season and 16-3 in the postseason. That is absolute domination from start to finish. Awesome to see Indiana native Brad Stevens get his first ring!!  I hope the Pacers close the gap and look forward to battling the Celtics the next few years. 
    • shasta519
      Chris Ballard: Redfining what Success means in the NFL

      By shasta519 · Posted

      I do agree about the great OL and play caller.    The DL will come down whether Latu is a legit stud pass rusher right away. JT has been a great RB, but not the past two years. The receivers are solid, but seems like most teams have good-great WR groups anymore.    This feels like a "if everything goes right" kind of thing. But it's the offseason.  

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...