Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Do The Colts Have Too Many Polians?


nitecrawler

Recommended Posts

Please, that's like us saying there is also no evidence that Peyton Manning doesn't have the plague and that is why he's out. To say someone is suffering from something it's on the person throwing that out there to show evidence of it being there not the other way around.

Chris Polian also backed up why he was hired as the director of pro scouting. Who do you think found all those undrafted free agents that his dad signed? Frankly our draft fall offs has gone hand and hand with the time Chris Polian stopped being the head of scouting and became more invovled with the GM role side of things. I do agree with that Chris Polian would be a GM some place else if we hadn't locked him up in fact there Falcons were very close to hiring both him and Jim Caldwell and taking them to Atlanta that's why we locked them into place as GM and Head Coach in waiting.

Frankly I wouldn't put too much stock in the titles the Colts use. We all know Bill Polian is still the person making the final call on things on there. Yes I do think he has been giving his son more power over time and is going to give Chris Polian the job full-time but the fact Chris Polian holds the title of GM doesn't mean he's making the final call on things, yes his dad is giving him more power on several things like the draft but I would almost be willing to bet the house that dad still has veto power.

Contradiction made easy. In your 1st paragraph you demand evidence re nepotism, in your final paragraph you show no evidence of Bill's right to veto.

Or maybe you have it, but are keeping it up your sleeve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What type of atmosphere must there be in the FO when you see long-time employees being fired(Powers) to give positions to Polians? Do others in the front office fear dissention or offering opinions that differ from that of a Polian?

Is nepotism in the FO good for the Colts? :hmm:

I agree that in most business environments nepotism is not a good thing. Usually it involves the owner bringing in an incompetent nephew or two - leading to much resentment and a general loss of respect. I don't think that that applies here. Considering Bill's age, I was extremely happy to learn that his son is essentially replacing him. It's the closest thing to cloning we are going to get. Any new GM would come in with the goal of changing things - even if they are successful - purely to make his own mark. Instead we have a guy who is thoroughly versed in Bill's much talked of system and eager to apply it going forward. It's worked for a very long time, and I don't want radical change. Who knows, he might even turn out to be more media friendly which would stop a lot of the irrational hatred.

I don't know anything about Denis, but if he can do his job it shouldn't be a problem. I don't like the concept of someone being fired specifically to make room for a Polian, but I find it hard to believe that whatever happened was that simple or callous. If he can do his assigned tasks, there is little reason to care about his presence. It is only if he stinks but is retained anyway that it becomes an issue.

In short, I'll say that "You can never have too many Polians", but I won't insert the sarcasm. When you talk of nepotism, I just think back to the days when we had the worst GM in football - and his name was Jim Irsay. Considering where he came from, I'm just grateful that Jim isn't an irrational control freak like some owners I could mention. Go ahead Mr Irsay, hire as many Polians as you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point on the nepotism comment, I'm sure some people on this forum that know nothing about business MIGHT criticize you. Being a business student myself we see it's not a good thing. For instance, my best friend started up a major business with some very good friends of his, but under no circumstances do they deny privileges to other based on hiring friends or family members. It would basically be a human resources violation to an extent. It happens all the time in the business world and turns out being bad for the most part, (it CAN ruin great client relations).

That being said, I personally have no knowledge of how the Polians run their business, but if they release people and deny opportunity for others based on the fact that they would rather hire family members or friends (even if they are much less experienced) that's bad business. In today's business world it's not a great thing.

I own a small business and can tell you that I only hire qualified people. I have a resposibility to keep business running good so that employees have jobs and I can give them Ins. I have helped people before but am very carefull about it. Bottem line is I expect good results. The Polians really havnt done that great of a job. Getting Mannining was the best thing they have done. He has made this team and now we are seeing the reprocusions of the FO mistakes. This week will tell everything, if we cant be competitive against Clevland , then, we need to look to the future and start all over. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it also has to be understood with caution when people say, "Levis played in Pro style offense, and he could be pro ready".    I have serious doubts that Levis would be able to start NFL games immediately in his rookie season. What exactly did Kentucky program prepare him to be in the situation, if they're not good? His games are full of very short range throws that make stats and completion percentage look great. People misunderstand that as if he's very accurate as a passer.    On one hand, we say Kentucky program didn't have good supporting cast. On the other hand, we say their program had NFL style offense and he was talented above the level of his team mates.    Sounds like a lot of projection for me to trust his QB evaluations. 
    • So go sign a guy who can do what the mid level draftee can do. Jimmy G just got $24m/year. I guess what I'm saying is that even if you draft a guy who doesn't have that high level potential, there's nothing preventing you from finding an upgrade, and in the meantime, you still have a competent young QB who can run your offense, instead of a guy who's getting booed by your fans after every missed third down attempt. We're basically talking about Derek Carr, who we all agree the Raiders should have upgraded from five years ago, but he's still good enough to provide your team with a stable floor.     Very well put.   And I agree on Richardson, he doesn't put his head down and run around like a mad man. His default mode is to find an open man, and that makes him twice as dangerous to defenses. I'm not trying to rain on the Richardson parade, I like him. Just trying to promote honest and balanced discourse, because there's two sides to every coin.     I mean, Stroud makes those guys you're naming look like mannequins. They already kind of look like mannequins. I don't think he should be comped to guys like Manning or Brady. Goff is a decent comp, but I think Stroud can move better than Goff could coming out, and I think Goff hit some noteworthy highs when he was in a good situation. Ultimately what held Goff back was his processing, not really his inability to make plays out of structure. He just couldn't see it/didn't trust it, and McVay pulled back, and then he was basically a shell of himself by the time they got to the SB. He's looking more like a QB you can win with these days, even though we know he has a ceiling.   And other guys who primarily operate from the pocket include Burrow, Tua... Stafford can move but he doesn't run (and he's better out of structure than other pocket guys), same for Dak. But any of these guys have to be able to get out of trouble and either pick up a 3rd and 4 with their legs, or complete a pass on the run. I think that's something Stroud has on tape. What's tough is, like you said, he's rarely pressured, so he doesn't have to.    I guess that's the real value of the Georgia game. What will he do when he faces pressure? Will he just fold in the pocket, like Goff did in the SB? Or does he have the ability to extend a play with movement, and still perform? The one play that I really like from the Georgia game is the first TD to Harrison, where he escapes right, points to the corner, and then fires the ball 40 yards to the back of the end zone. Even the second TD to Harrison, I don't know if Stroud is consistently surviving contact like that in the NFL, but the movement is there, and the throw downfield is on the money. Those plays are more than Manning/Brady/Rivers level of movement. That's Burrow/Stafford stuff.   No doubt the landscape has changed, but you also don't get high level processing like Manning/Brady/Rivers/Brees. That's rarefied air, even for their own time period, we're talking about some of the best pocket passers of all time. From 2006 to 2014 is probably the best collective QBing in NFL history, and it's mostly pocket guys, despite the read option stuff that started happening around 2011. We generally won't see guys who are that good anymore. So you can't have a mannequin at QB. But I don't think Stroud is a mannequin.
    • Goes to show you how little they value pro days.  Panthers playing them for all its worth.  Which isn’t much.
    • If the foot was broken, did Levis have surgery after the college season and before the Combine?    Not sure what to make of it.. if his injuries were serious, that would raise a question now if the team drafting would be able to start the NFL season.    I guess, Honest details about the injuries aren't going to be forthcoming, people are going to take that as a concern or excuse or real reason depending on whether they like Levis or not. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...