Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Overpay For Orton?


dn4192

Recommended Posts

I know, let's just have a different QB play every week.

game 1: Kerry Collins

game 2: Curtis Painter

game 3: Kyle Orton

game 4: Dan Orlovsky (might as well bring him back too)

game 5: Shaun Hill (see above)

game 6: Marc Bulger (I'm sure we could sweet talk him out of retirement for just one game)

game 7: Carson Palmer (I'm sure the Bengals would let him go if we promise to only play him for one game)

game 8: Chris Simms (his dad was HOF so he has to be good too right? Plus he's left handed so that'll throw off the opposing defense)

game 9: Matt Leinart (we have to promise Houston to have him back by sundown. Plus he's left handed...see above)

game 10: Joseph Addai (ok the left handed thing is losing it's appeal and it should be painfully clear I'm running out of ideas by now so I won't go on)

First people want to get rid of Painter and they want a veteran QB. We bring in Kerry Collins. After 1 game (with less than 3 weeks of preparation) Collins goes in and has an off game with a virtually brand new offensive line. Then people want Painter back. Now we want to overpay for Kyle Orton (who Miami couldn't persuade Denver to part with) and give up valuable draft picks that could help cure some of our defensive woes for a QB who would only play until Manning comes back? Wow you REALLY want to try to make a run for the SB in Indy don't you? It's time to face it, playing at home in the SB is not really much of an option anymore. Don't get me wrong, anything is possible but the odds are just a little bit more than slightly stacked against us.

This is the stupidest idea I've ever seen.

You can't have two lefties starting in back to back weeks.

You have to break them up, else the element of surprise is gone come week 9.

Think next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No....bad idea.

It's too late to get a new QB into the system and expect them to get caught up with the offense.

The time to bring in a 'new' QB was 2 months ago when training camp was getting ready to start.

There is no sense in trading players / picks for a guy that will take weeks to learn the offense and get ready to go. Don't hurt the future, just for a slightly better chance to finish 8-8.

They'll need to ride out this season with Collins (and Painter -- once Collins get injured in a few weeks) and then take a new look at things once April comes along. At that point, they should know if Manning is 100% or if they have such a bad record that they'll be in a position to take Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah b/c we all no Purdue QB's can't win.......OH wait Brees won a SB and the only reason the bears played us in one is b/c Orton won them a lot of games that year. I'm not saying I want Orton by any means but that kid can win.

lol....okay, you're right....we have to give Purdue a happy face for Drew Brees.

But see Orton's stat line in 2006-2007....Soldier Field hot dog vendors had as much to do with the Bears getting to the Super Bowl that year as Orton did.

http://www.nfl.com/player/kyleorton/2506444/careerstats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would but would want a deal where it was a third round pick, but couldn’t see Saints doing that.  Woukd have a high end CB and still have our top two picks
    • nice     Edit:   Also both the trades mentioned here pretty much followed the draft value chart.     Talking trading up to #38 from #44 and offering a 4th   Difference in #38 and #44 is 60pts(avg 4th round value)   Ended up trading up to #41 from #44 for a 5th.   Difference in #41 and #44 is 30pts(avg 5th round value)  
    • Our defense will never be GREAT as long as we play * defense by having corners 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 3. And an unbelievable unwillingness to blitz more than 4 times a game. And also, it doesn't matter who is in the secondary if the front seven can't stop the run(we can) and get to the passer(we did ok getting to the passer, but we need more blitzing from lb'ers). Our first pick should be an offensive lineman like Fuaga, Powers-Johnson, or Barton. Then target a receiver like Polk, Pearsall, Washington, Corley, or Roman Wilson in the second or third rounds. As much as I would like to get Bowers I just don't see it happening. And we need a very good linebacker to go along with Speed and Franklin.
    • Yeah, could very well be. I think I remember Ballard said he did it to have more flexibility when asked. if it is Paye, I would rather see him play out the year before extending.
    • The idea of DeJean going in the late first round is due to his instincts and overall very competent play in nearly all aspects of DB play.  Cover 3 FS is more valuable, IMO, than a cover 2 FS.   Contrast DeJean's overall RAS and talents with Hooker, who was only good at being a single high deep guy...especially his rookie year where he picked off bad QBs for a while...and DeJean at 22 or later with a 3rd round pick gathered from a trade down is a much better decision than Hooker was at 15.   BTW, Blackmon had the same ACL injury as Hooker and did well as an overall S as a rookie, but wasn't a single high speed guy, and is probably still a better overall S now than Hooker is in DAL...both having the exact same injury years ago.
  • Members

    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,833

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,381

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 588

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 4,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 3,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,237

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheBlueAndWhite

      TheBlueAndWhite 154

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,975

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...