Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Question about yesterdays Pats v Colts game..


JimJaime

Recommended Posts

I have not seen thia anywhere, so I apologize if this has been mentioned but..

The Pats were jumping the Colts snap count pretty much all game (2nd qrtr on.) is there a reason why Luck or your OC didn't change it up? (I mean even the guys in the booth noticed the Pats were jumping the snap count.)

Found it odd, and a possible HUGE Achillees heel if other teams pick up on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts offense was fine in the 1st Quarter. Pats made some adjustments and the Colts O died. It is easy to forget how good the other teams are when things are going your way. Bellycheck has 4 SB rings to prove he's a fine coach. Doesn't mean I like him, but give him his dues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense has changed the snap count during games before this year. I'm not sure how frequently they do so, especially on the road, but yesterday would have been a good game to use some hard counts and other little tricks to slow the Pats down.

Of course, aside from the mistakes (interceptions, dropped passes, fumbles), our offense was having a pretty good day. We just made too many mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think too that the pats were taking chances . . . so some of the fast jumps off the line was trying to guess the snap count. . . perhaps we may have know others . . . but we did have a few offense from what i recall so there was some guess and early jumping going on . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much of it is formation and motion tendencies as opposed to snap count? Or maybe better asked, in addition to snap count alone... I see a lot of the same motion, like with Reggie, who will protect the back side of a play. So when Reggie finishes that motion, the snap is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ballard does have thick skin.  You just choose to not to see it that way.      Ballard is the face and voice of the franchise.  Irsay’s health does not make him an effective public face of the franchise.  Frank was OK, Steichen less so.   So Ballard does the lion share of teams PR.    And Ballard has always said he’d rather the fans be angry than be apathetic.  Shows they care.  Of course, you know this but choose not to acknowledge it because it undercuts your distorted view of CB.   I don’t know what CBs relationship is with Kevin Bowen who I like.   So let’s say it’s complicated.   But on balance I think Ballard has a good relationship with the local media.  I’d be surprised if he didn’t.  He is loved by national media.  He’s got a personality and a sense of humor.  I’m sorry you don’t care for it.    Of course you have yet to acknowledge that you and Moose literally said that Ballard didn’t know enough about Mitchell to know if he was a good guy.   For a man in your profession, THAT is a whopper.  Why you thought that is a mystery?   By the way, hope you notice that at least twice I’ve now said you’re smarter than you show.  There’s a compliment in there somewhere if you let yourself see it.    But I think you’ve painted yourself into a corner.  You come across as someone who’d rather be right about Ballard being bad even if it means the Colts do poorly than be wrong and have the Colts do well.    The reason Irsay hasn’t fired Ballard for the teams record is because Irsay approved of what CB was doing in real time.   Believe what you want but Irsay has done the GM job himself so he knows how it goes.  And he has chosen to keep Ballard.  Unless you don’t like Irsay too, you might want to consider that.  Life is more fun being optimistic than negative.     Sorry this went so long.  
    • I think it’s backwards.  MPJ is definitely Reggie based on skill set and tendencies.  AD can become Marvin with his explosiveness.   Raimann - I think he’ll be Castonzo.  Ol reliable, underappreciated, majority won’t realize how good he was until he’s gone.   AD - if he becomes what we think he can, Ocho Cinco.  Cocky, competitive, but will perform his butt off and will dance every chance he gets lol   Jelani Woods - Jimmy Graham, fast for his size, walking mismatch.
    • speaking of which, I’m about to win some good money.  I bet that brown would be FMVP, the Celtics would win the series, and it last at least 4 games.  
    • more reason to believe that after the top 3 wide receivers, Latu was their guy.  To not accept an offer to move back ONLY 4 spots and gain a top 100 pick is hard to do.  Bet if the rams through in a second instead of a third we might’ve took it.   think about it, if you move back 4 spots you’d still have a shot at one of the two top corners or even Dallas turner.  And we said no thanks, we want Latu. 
  • Members

    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,680

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Creekside

      Creekside 779

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,064

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 1,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,693

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...