Danny Pinter

[compuls1v3]

I’ve seen a few folks stating he should be playing over Kelly.  My only concern with this is that if he looked to weak playing RG, what makes anyone think he would hold up (strength wise) at center?  Just curious what people are thinking on this.

[Restinpeacesweetchloe]

4 minutes ago, compuls1v3 said:

I’ve seen a few folks stating he should be playing over Kelly.  My only concern with this is that if he looked to weak playing RG, what makes anyone think he would hold up (strength wise) at center?  Just curious what people are thinking on this.

It’s actually the opposite 

[#12.]

Dude was beyond bad at RG.  He needs to be about option #4 at RG.

 

I'm in no hurry to just hand him the job at center in the way he was handed the job at RG.

[Archer]

2 reasons:

 

1) He played quite a bit of center last year and looked pretty good.

2) Centers spend many of their pass pro reps giving help to one of the guards.  The guards seem much more likely to be bull rushed one-on-one, which is the type of rush Pinter couldn’t handle.  Pinter’s good at completing those combo blocks from the center position, but he doesn’t have the strength to hold up against a NT on his own…

[RollerColt]

Pinter is an interesting case. I'm a Ball State alum, I've seen him play in college so naturally I root for him to succeed. My memory is slightly fuzzy, but I remember he was originally slated to play TE, before moving to OT. Playing guard is obviously not what he is good at... 

[lester]

7 hours ago, RollerColt said:

 I'm a Ball State alum…

 

Chirp chirp

[RollerColt]

1 minute ago, lester said:

 

Chirp chirp

 

Still rooting and hoping Pinter can be of service somewhere on this line. He was really good at BSU.