Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Need Fantasy Football advice for 2018? Ask here!


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Narcosys said:

@Chad72

 

E. Sanders is injured and probably out. Is Sutton now a play over anyone?

 

Yes, he is. Just not sure what is going to happen with him garnering all the attention? I am sure someone else will emerge, just not sure who, just the timing of it is terrible.

 

Same thing with Boyd and A.J.Green. However, I trust Boyd more than Sutton, if you look at both their situations and target shares. Jeff Heuermann was getting targets, he goes on IR, and then Sutton's targets go up, and now Sanders goes on IR, which probably makes it harder on Sutton, IMO.

 

I really don't know. Just go with who you have, to be honest. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coltsfan1953 said:

I need a second running back. Tarik Cohen, Jordan Howard or Justin Jackson? Thanks.

 

Amongst those, easily Tarik Cohen. Whenever a game is competitive for the Bears, Tarik Cohen is the guy but the Rams do have good sideline-to-sideline speed amongst their LBs, but the game will be competitive. Justin Jackson has the same upside but at this point in the season, Cohen is the safest floor, so you go with Cohen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two questions about who to start? 

First, which defense do I start?

Texans (home against Indy) or

Chargers (home against the Bengals)? 

Second, im thinking of picking Samuels up for the steelers but would need to drop another RB to do so (league limits me to 5 RBs), would you drop either P.  Barber or Tevin Coleman for Samuels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:

I have two questions about who to start? 

First, which defense do I start?

Texans (home against Indy) or

Chargers (home against the Bengals)? 

Second, im thinking of picking Samuels up for the steelers but would need to drop another RB to do so (league limits me to 5 RBs), would you drop either P.  Barber or Tevin Coleman for Samuels?

 

Chargers for defense.

 

Peyton Barber - Saints, Ravens, Cowboys is the run D line up he is facing, not good for him.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:

I have two questions about who to start? 

First, which defense do I start?

Texans (home against Indy) or

Chargers (home against the Bengals)? 

Second, im thinking of picking Samuels up for the steelers but would need to drop another RB to do so (league limits me to 5 RBs), would you drop either P.  Barber or Tevin Coleman for Samuels?

Chargers, barber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, teganslaw said:

Tournament PPR: Godwin or Humphries against NO? I'm not sure who will have the larger impact or snaps. Both seem like good choices. 

 

Godwin, speaking objectively though I own Humphries in 2 leagues. DeSean Jackson will not be back this year or next year, IMO, and Chris Godwin has a chance to show what he can do as an outside wide out vs the Saints. He will definitely get more yards and outside wide outs have scored TDs in road games vs Saints recently (Diggs/Thielen, Julio/Ridley). I hate that it might turn out that way because I own Humphries but that is my objective evaluation. :) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Yes, he is. Just not sure what is going to happen with him garnering all the attention? I am sure someone else will emerge, just not sure who, just the timing of it is terrible.

 

Same thing with Boyd and A.J.Green. However, I trust Boyd more than Sutton, if you look at both their situations and target shares. Jeff Heuermann was getting targets, he goes on IR, and then Sutton's targets go up, and now Sanders goes on IR, which probably makes it harder on Sutton, IMO.

 

I really don't know. Just go with who you have, to be honest. 

 

With Darnold possibly returning and McCown playing well, I'm not certain that the bills would be the best defense to play. The Rams D versus Bears could be better IF Trubisky doesn't play, and KC could be a smart play too with Lamar Jackson not being a true passer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

 

With Darnold possibly returning and McCown playing well, I'm not certain that the bills would be the best defense to play. The Rams D versus Bears could be better IF Trubisky doesn't play, and KC could be a smart play too with Lamar Jackson not being a true passer. 

 

May I present the fact that it is Darnold's first game back and he has thrown an INT every 14 pass attempts for the highest in the NFL outside Nathan Peterman, who is no longer in the league. I am actually scared that Darnold is starting. I hope he doesn't go Nathan Peterman on me since I am going against the Bills D in a league. They are also the #1 D vs QBs. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, hear me out, tell me if I am crazy or reasonable:

 

I am in this 14 team league that is all about capping QB production. 3 points for passing TD only, 0.02 per passing yards, -1 for INT, 1 point for 300-399 yards, 0.1 for each pass completed, 6 pts for rushing or receiving TD, 0.08 points per rushing yard. 

 

This means that (say) if Luck throws for 350 yards, completes 30 passes and 2 TDs, 1 INT vs the Texans, he gets 7 + 3 + 6 - 1, a whopping 15 points. Luck has not been running a lot lately. So even if I throw in 20 yards rushing, I get to 16.6 points.

 

My other QB is Josh Allen. I saw how Mariota used his legs vs the Jets at home, and how Allen has been running a lot. 0.08 per rushing yards.

 

So, if Josh Allen rushes for 60 yards (he has been rushing for way more than this) and 1 TD, throws for 200 yards and 1 TD completing 20 passes, I get 60 * 0.08 = 4.8 + 6 + 4 + 3 + 2 = 19.8 points.

 

Given how my league's points are structured, does Josh Allen become a better play at home vs Jets than Luck with a Ryan Kelly-less-Jack Doyle-less OL going against the Texans' DL on the road, or at worst a push in a home match up against the Jets???

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Alright, hear me out, tell me if I am crazy or reasonable:

 

I am in this 14 team league that is all about capping QB production. 3 points for passing TD only, 0.02 per passing yards, -1 for INT, 1 point for 300-399 yards, 0.1 for each pass completed, 6 pts for rushing or receiving TD, 0.08 points per rushing yard. 

 

This means that (say) if Luck throws for 350 yards, completes 30 passes and 2 TDs, 1 INT vs the Texans, he gets 7 + 3 + 6 - 1, a whopping 15 points. Luck has not been running a lot lately. So even if I throw in 20 yards rushing, I get to 16.6 points.

 

My other QB is Josh Allen. I saw how Mariota used his legs vs the Jets at home, and how Allen has been running a lot. 0.08 per rushing yards.

 

So, if Josh Allen rushes for 60 yards (he has been rushing for way more than this) and 1 TD, throws for 200 yards and 1 TD completing 20 passes, I get 60 * 0.08 = 4.8 + 6 + 4 + 3 + 2 = 19.8 points.

 

Given how my league's points are structured, does Josh Allen become a better play at home vs Jets than Luck with a Ryan Kelly-less-Jack Doyle-less OL going against the Texans' DL on the road, or at worst a push in a home match up against the Jets???

 

 

The math adds up and it seems running QB's are worth more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, teganslaw said:

Either Jordan Thomas or Cameron Brate. Both games could be high scoring. I don't trust Herndon against Buffalo and not sure about Seal-Jones. 

Might role with thomas or Herndon. He gets the targets from darnold.  Thomas is a real flyer to me. Brate is up against the toughest defense when it comes to TEs. Their LBs have been stopping all TEs.

 

Plus I already have Humphries and Evans starting...I'll look more into thomas, but they just don't incorporate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

Might role with thomas or Herndon. He gets the targets from darnold.  Thomas is a real flyer to me. Brate is up against the toughest defense when it comes to TEs. Their LBs have been stopping all TEs.

 

Plus I already have Humphries and Evans starting...I'll look more into thomas, but they just don't incorporate him.

 

Herndon gets targets from Darnold, who is supposed to start vs Bills on Sunday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, teganslaw said:

I saw that Darnold will be back, but the Bills have normally been tough on TEs. Maybe it would be worth a shot for Herndon because of Darnold, although I would temper my expectations. I could be wrong, but that's just how I feel. 

 

Cowboys got gouged by Zach Ertz the first time, how has Dallas Goedert been doing? I bet they devote extra resources to Ertz and Goedert might be the recipient this time. 

 

This is the targets for TE from weeks 11 through 13, and in fantasy, it typically a case of what you have done for me lately:

 

https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/reports/targets-distribution/te.php?year=2018&start=11&end=13&show=totals

 

 

Dallas Goedert and Demetrius Harris stand out to me among the TE2 guys. Unless one of those TE1 guys is still available and you trust them??? Giants are weak vs TEs and I bet Reed or Davis finds the end zone this weekend.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Cowboys got gouged by Zach Ertz the first time, how has Dallas Goedert been doing? I bet they devote extra resources to Ertz and Goedert might be the recipient this time. 

 

This is the targets for TE from weeks 11 through 13, and in fantasy, it typically a case of what you have done for me lately:

 

https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/reports/targets-distribution/te.php?year=2018&start=11&end=13&show=totals

 

 

Dallas Goedert and Demetrius Harris stand out to me among the TE2 guys. Unless one of those TE1 guys is still available and you trust them??? Giants are weak vs TEs and I bet Reed or Davis finds the end zone this weekend.

 

Of the ones with 10+ targets on that list

Herndon

R. Ellison

Brate

D. Arnold

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Narcosys said:

@chad72, @teganslaw

 

The weather forecast for TB vs NO is near thunderstorm level, 100% chance of rain, with 10-12 mph winds from one endzone to the other.

The game could be postponed if thunder and lightning is a problem. Also, it might not be as high scoring.  Have to see how this affects fantasy as I have Godwin in one of my lineups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, teganslaw said:

Does anyone let weather determine their fantasy lineup? I'm thinking about the forecast in Tampa. If the weather is going to be bad, maybe I shouldn't use anyone from NO or Tampa in my lineup, go with another team. Thoughts? 

The thunderstorms are in the morning, done by noon and rain stops by 2, and only 10% chance by game time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Herndon is an okay option with Darnold back, however, with Beckham out, I would go with Engram. I think he scores today with 4-6 receptions.

Tick off saints, only 1 TD to TEs for the season...two to brate already. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

I saw that. I dont think anyone could have predicted over 200 yards and a td by halftime...

 

Playing both Justin Jackson and Humphries over Ware and Kittle, enough said. Ekeler got a jolt of job security and is running mad today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Playing both Justin Jackson and Humphries over Ware and Kittle, enough said. Ekeler got a jolt of job security and is running mad today

Ya I have them too. I wouldn't have won anyways. But the #1 defenses gave up the most, NO and Bal, over the people who had the easiest matchups.

 

Sorry man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Ya I have them too. I wouldn't have won anyways. But the #1 defenses gave up the most, NO and Bal, over the people who had the easiest matchups.

 

Sorry man.

 

I am hanging by a thread with a 17 point lead with Chris Carson and Diggs for my opponent tonight. It is a 0.5 PPR, so I am not too hopeful. I need a lot of luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

I am hanging by a thread with a 17 point lead with Chris Carson and Diggs for my opponent tonight. It is a 0.5 PPR, so I am not too hopeful. I need a lot of luck. 

ya it's going to be close, but Diggs could fall on his face in this matchup like he does against tough opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Narcosys said:

ya it's going to be close, but Diggs could fall on his face in this matchup like he does against tough opponents.

 

That Carson TD with 3 minutes to go did me in. Otherwise, I would have won by a couple of points. Darn Justin Jackson and Humphries.

 

I remember several years ago when I was trying to hold on to a lead vs Seattle on MNF going against Marshawn Lynch. With 3 minutes to go, RW passes to Lynch for a TD for me to lose that game. Seattle and their primary RBs on MNF holding on to a lead, I had a weird gut feeling remembering that game when I was following this game. My worst fears came true. You can't make this stuff up.  :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion and Havlicek or Sam Jones would go for 30 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
    • Caitlin Clark 1 Angel Reese 0. Fever beat Sky 71-70. You lose Angel Reese. 
    • I'm all for doubling down and going EDGE in the 1st again. Just got to make sure we get the right one. Depending on where we draft, I'm okay with trading up a couple of picks to snatch the better pass rusher of the bunch. Since there will be a good amount of rushers, I hear, let's go get the better one. I can also see the draft being the opposite as this years. Most teams will go defense now in this draft, and very good offensive players fall. I think we are perfect on offense, that's why I'm okay with trading up to get the guy we need on defense.
    • IMHO , its all about perspective   If you treat Pierce as WR1, you will be disappointed   If you treat Pierce as a solid contributor, you will be pleased   - The man can block, maybe the best blocking WR on this team - The man has speed - The man can rotate in with our other WRs   I do believe that AD Mitchell will take over as a starting outside WR   The reality is, 17 games is a LONG season,    Pittman and AD Mitchell will be "fresher" for the end of the game as they are rotated in and out   The odds say that there will be injuries, and we could see Pierce be a starter on either side   I for one, WANT to keep Pierce thru his rookie deal (We will see after that)      
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...