Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ballard seems to like experienced OL


Nobody

Recommended Posts

Hello again friends! I noticed this coincidence yesterday and considered writing something up about it.

 

Draft pick Zach Banner started his final 3 years at USC after being injured as a freshman, 27 starts.

UDFA Deyshawn Bond started all 4 years for borderline power 5 school Cincinnati.

UDFA Chris Mullen started 49(!!!) games at Rutgers.

Even physical freak UDFA Jerry Ugokwe started 42 straight games at William & Mary.

 

Going back to his days in KC- they took one OL in 2016 (Parker Ehringer) and he was a 4 year starter. In 2014 they took Mitch Morse, who started his last three years after being a key backup as a freshman, and Zach Fulton who started 40 games for Tennessee. Plus Eric Fisher first overall in 2013 (played all 4 years at CMU). Couldn't find start data for Eric Kush from Cal (PA) or Laurent Duvernay-Tardif from McGill. 

 

It seems a bit too deep to be coincidence. May be something to keep in mind for future drafts as to who we may be more or less high on.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think thats the case with most OL that get drafted at all. Players, no matter the position, get knocked all the time for lack of experience.  I think its more of a coincidence at this point - at least I would say there isnt enough evidence as it pertains to OL. Hooker had one year. Hairston had 2 years total as a CB (he was a WR converted to CB). We'll see over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I think thats the case with most OL that get drafted at all. Players, no matter the position, get knocked all the time for lack of experience.  I think its more of a coincidence at this point - at least I would say there isnt enough evidence as it pertains to OL. Hooker had one year. Hairston had 2 years total as a CB (he was a WR converted to CB). We'll see over time.

Maybe it is the case with most drafted linemen, but I think my post is a pretty strong case for it being more than a coincidence. I didn't pick and choose guys, literally everyone in this list going back to 2013 played all 4 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OL playing with their hands in the dirt during times of spread offenses are harder to find and project to the next level. Hence I do not blame any GM drafting for a position where boys from college on the OL or DL will be going against men at the next level, especially at a position where the transitions are the hardest amongst draft picks, mainly the interior one.

 

That is why OTs and outside rushers can be drafted a tad more on potential while interior OL almost always need some seasoning and strength to be considered top draft material, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nobody said:

Maybe it is the case with most drafted linemen, but I think my post is a pretty strong case for it being more than a coincidence. I didn't pick and choose guys, literally everyone in this list going back to 2013 played all 4 years. 

Im not saying you are wrong or anything...just saying I would like to see more history.  

 

You could be right, but Ballard has been GM for only a year, so we will see. You could be right...I certainly cant say you are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Grigson did too....

 

Kelly started for 3 years...

 

Clark started for 4 years...

 

Haeg started for 4 years...

 

And Blythe started for 3 years,  maybe 4....

 

Every GM likes experienced lineman,  but they're not always easy to find...     and when you do find them,  some have "issues"...

 

--- Heath issues...

--- Character issues...

--- Style of play issues (read: spread offense)

 

You're night wrong in your observation,  you just need to expand it a bit more for the bigger picture....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...