Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jay Kirk Baseball Thread since 2017: The 2020 season, Nationals Repeat?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2006Coltsbestever

    5806

  • NFLfan

    2266

  • Jay Kirk

    2230

  • PrincetonTiger

    1833

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just wanted to let everyone know I still feel healthy, just working a lot. Hozer and I miss doing play by play of Cubs games on here and commenting on the games. Everything will be back to normal soon

As most of you know, I'm a Cardinals fan.  But you don't know that at one time I was a Cubs fan.  This was in the early 1980's while I was in college and got cable TV.  Our TV provider had WGN and sin

I just got an anonymous call on my phone which I usually don't answer when I don't see a number I recognize. I answered it and the person said SOX and hung up.  I have no clue who it was  

Posted Images

16 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Game is over already lol.

6-0

 

wierd stuff going on. Schwarber attempts a bunt on third strike nobody on was really odd. Q is not on his game at all. Everyone seems to be in a funk.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@PrincetonTiger

Have you seen the Evansville Otters? I was talking with my sister-in-law's mother. She said her cousin's son just got signed by the Otters. His name is Chris Panzarella. I met his mother at my brother's wedding 6 years ago. Hope he does well for you Evansville. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cards a game back and I expected the Top 3 to battle all season , but look where the Reds are I think they may be a bit short but don't count them out. Dog days of August will probably tell the story in this division. Who knows the moves that will be made at the trade deadline. This is one tough division from top to bottom.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

NFL  I have not got a good read on the Mets , one second they look like world beaters the next oh well . Someone needs to reel in the Braves over there . I believe the Mets still can make a move . The Phillies are not as good as some thought they would be . Still a lot of season left , things may change totally .

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, NFLfan said:

@PrincetonTiger

Have you seen the Evansville Otters? I was talking with my sister-in-law's mother. She said her cousin's son just got signed by the Otters. His name is Chris Panzarella. I met his mother at my brother's wedding 6 years ago. Hope he does well for you Evansville. 

We were in Evansville last weekend and went to an Otters game.  Great experience. The field is about a hundred years old but is pretty well kept.  We were given free tickets because they had some turned back in by people who couldn't go. Concessions are priced nicely. A 16 oz beer for 5 bucks.  They have beer battered french fries which are the best. I enjoyed it so much.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Jay Kirk said:

NFL  I have not got a good read on the Mets , one second they look like world beaters the next oh well . Someone needs to reel in the Braves over there . I believe the Mets still can make a move . The Phillies are not as good as some thought they would be . Still a lot of season left , things may change totally .

What is up Jay?

 

Remember I picked the Braves to win that division at the beginning of the season, it is still early though. In regards to the NL Central, the whole division is good and every team is spurty. Cubs are only up .5 over the Brewers and 1 over the Cards. Reds and Pirates even have had their moments so far this year. Hard to believe we are almost halfway through the season already but still away to go.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heading into June 23rd. The NL playoff teams would be:

Dodgers 53-25 (NL West leader, 1st spot)

Braves 45-32 (NL East leader, 2nd spot)

Cubs 41-35 (NL Central leader 3rd spot)

Brewers 41-36 (4th spot, WC)

Cards and Rockies both 40-36 tied for the final, 5th spot, WC)

 

-I still will stick with 3 teams making the playoffs in the NL Central = Cubs, Brewers, and Cards. I still have the Braves winning the East. Dodgers was the easiest pick of all of them in the West.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, hippiejohn said:

We were in Evansville last weekend and went to an Otters game.  Great experience. The field is about a hundred years old but is pretty well kept.  We were given free tickets because they had some turned back in by people who couldn't go. Concessions are priced nicely. A 16 oz beer for 5 bucks.  They have beer battered french fries which are the best. I enjoyed it so much.

 

Thanks for sharing. That is good to know. If I ever visit that part of Indiana, I will have to go to a game there. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Jay Kirk said:

NFL  I have not got a good read on the Mets , one second they look like world beaters the next oh well . Someone needs to reel in the Braves over there . I believe the Mets still can make a move . The Phillies are not as good as some thought they would be . Still a lot of season left , things may change totally .

 

I don't know what to make of the Mets either. Their defense and their bullpen need to be greatly improved for them to be true contenders.

 

We still have half a season left and there is more than a month before the trade deadline. So, maybe they can upgrade in those areas before the season is lost. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I don't know what to make of the Mets either. Their defense and their bullpen need to be greatly improved for them to be true contenders.

 

We still have half a season left and there is more than a month before the trade deadline. So, maybe they can upgrade in those areas before the season is lost. 

Still a ways to go. Mets are still definitely in the WC hunt. I do like the Braves in that division. I was never sold on the Phillies, still not. They paid way too much for Harper. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Still a ways to go. Mets are still definitely in the WC hunt. I do like the Braves in that division. I was never sold on the Phillies, still not. They paid way too much for Harper. 

 

As you know, I never wanted Harper or Machado, the $300+ million dollar guys. The Phillies built this All Star roster but are not playing up to par. Someone on the Mets site said that they have been slumping ever since McCutcheon got injured. I think he is out for the season. Harper has way underachieved. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

As you know, I never wanted Harper or Machado, the $300+ million dollar guys. The Phillies built this All Star roster but are not playing up to par. Someone on the Mets site said that they have been slumping ever since McCutcheon got injured. I think he is out for the season. Harper has way underachieved. 

Harper is a very good player, some think a great one but he isn't worth that type of money. JMO. I like Jake but is an all-time great Cub. McCutcheon getting injured does hurt them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Harper is a very good player, some think a great one but he isn't worth that type of money. JMO. I like Jake but is an all-time great Cub. McCutcheon getting injured does hurt them.

 

Unlike Harper, Jake has played up to his contract so far.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cubs got 3 outfielders on the All Star Team. Over the offseason I heard rumblings that Bryant wanted Harper on the team. The Cubs are better without Harper. JMO. (I think Harper is solid but overrated.)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

Cubs got 3 outfielders on the All Star Team. Over the offseason I heard rumblings that Bryant wanted Harper on the team. The Cubs are better without Harper. JMO. (I think Harper is solid but overrated.)

Bryant and Harper are really good friends and grew up together in Vegas. So I could see Bryant wanting him in Chicago. It was never going to happen though. Just too much money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Baez with a 3 run homer, and Strop finally does his job!!!!! I’ll take a split against from what I saw the last 4 games a pretty damn good team!!! Imagine if they still had that player who shall remain nameless that still gives us fits!!!!!

 

6CA6C64A-328D-4B5C-987D-E7E4340F11D5.jpeg.cbd6c74eb60f280982443327f9ad4bd1.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, HOZER said:

Baez with a 3 run homer, and Strop finally does his job!!!!! I’ll take a split against from what I saw the last 4 games a pretty damn good team!!! Imagine if they still had that player who shall remain nameless that still gives us fits!!!!!

 

6CA6C64A-328D-4B5C-987D-E7E4340F11D5.jpeg.cbd6c74eb60f280982443327f9ad4bd1.jpeg

I figured it would take a HR late from either Bryant, Rizzo, or El Mago to beat them. The Mets are actually pretty good and played great against us. 2-2 is fine with me.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, HOZER said:

Baez with a 3 run homer, and Strop finally does his job!!!!! I’ll take a split against from what I saw the last 4 games a pretty damn good team!!! Imagine if they still had that player who shall remain nameless that still gives us fits!!!!!

 

6CA6C64A-328D-4B5C-987D-E7E4340F11D5.jpeg.cbd6c74eb60f280982443327f9ad4bd1.jpeg

 

Lol. We are not good. The manager is one of the worst in baseball. How does he leave Lugo in there for another inning when he had thrown nearly 40 pitches in the 7th! Also, the manager gives our best hitter McNeil the day off only to bring him in in a double switch but he never gets to hit. The manager should have had McNeil pinch hit for Cano or Gomez. The double switch made no sense. :wall:

 

Anyway, time to move on. Lol. (It is a sarcastic laugh with me shaking my head.)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Lol. We are not good. The manager is one of the worst in baseball. How does he leave Lugo in there for another inning when he had thrown nearly 40 pitches in the 7th! Also, the manager gives our best hitter McNeil the day off only to bring him in in a double switch but he never gets to hit. The manager should have had McNeil pinch hit for Cano or Gomez. The double switch made no sense. :wall:

 

Anyway, time to move on. Lol. (It is a sarcastic laugh with me shaking my head.)

Mets have a good team. You are a little hard them IMO. Alonso just gets a piece of the ball and it is flying over houses john cena lol GIF by Kids Choice Awards 2018

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Mets have a good team. You are a little hard them IMO. Alonso just gets a piece of the ball and it is flying over houses john cena lol GIF by Kids Choice Awards 2018

 

One player does not make a team. If it was not for Alonso and McNeil, many Mets fans would not pay attention this year.

 

I had no problem with Friday's loss. We had a minor leaguer pitching and the whole game was bad. The manager lost this game for us. Even with better moves, we may not have won, but give your team a chance by playing the best players. He sits two of our best players in Conforto and McNeil against Hamels. SMH

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

One player does not make a team. If it was not for Alonso and McNeil, many Mets fans would not pay attention this year.

 

I had no problem with Friday's loss. We had a minor leaguer pitching and the whole game was bad. The manager lost this game for us. Even with better moves, we may not have won, but give your team a chance by playing the best players. He sits two of our best players in Conforto and McNeil against Hamels. SMH

And one manager doesn’t make a team either. I agree that those probably weren’t the smartest moves, but I saw a lot of heads up plays and great baseball played by the Mets the last 4 games. All managers make boneheaded decisions, trust me Maddens had his moments. LOL, I got yelled at by some parents yesterday for some decisions(and mistakes,lol) I made while coaching my sons little league team in the second round of our season ending tournament, that we unfortunately lost! I’m by no means on a MLB managers level, but went with my gut and did what I thought was best for our team. It was a tough after game speech I’ll tell ya......but I tell my boys all the time, some days it just wasn’t meant to be, C’este la vie!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, HOZER said:

 

I'm telling you. This game was different. The normally calm and collected Mickey Callaway is feeling the heat. He realizes just as all the Mets fans on the site that he lost this for us. 

 

I normally don't get upset following baseball games. This one really upset me. All the Mets fans feel the same way. 

 

This particular sports journalist reportedly told the manager in a sarcastic tone, "See you tomorrow, Mickey", implying he may be fired. That is what got the manager enraged. If he felt secure in his job, that may not have bothered him. This game was bad. All the fans on the Mets sites, even normally level-headed ones, want him fired. It may come. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I'm telling you. This game was different. The normally calm and collected Mickey Callaway is feeling the heat. He realizes just as all the Mets fans on the site that he lost this for us. 

 

I normally don't get upset following baseball games. This one really upset me. All the Mets fans feel the same way. 

 

This particular sports journalist reportedly told the manager in a sarcastic tone, "See you tomorrow, Mickey", implying he may be fired. That is what got the manager enraged. If he felt secure in his job, that may not have bothered him. This game was bad. All the fans on the Mets sites, even normally level-headed ones, want him fired. It may come. 

I don't follow the Mets, he must make a lot of bad decisions, although I find it interesting that Vargas stuck up for him and fiercely went after the reporter. I also find it interesting that a lot of people act like it would have been a guaranteed win if he had left Conforto and McNeil in the lineup? Yes the Cubs played poorly the last couple of games but are dangerous at any moment. I know you said it would at least give them a chance against Hamels, so not singling you out. The Mets were doing fine and it looked like another win until El Mago got ahold of one!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, HOZER said:

I don't follow the Mets, he must make a lot of bad decisions, although I find it interesting that Vargas stuck up for him and fiercely went after the reporter. I also find it interesting that a lot of people act like it would have been a guaranteed win if he had left Conforto and McNeil in the lineup? Yes the Cubs played poorly the last couple of games but are dangerous at any moment. I know you said it would at least give them a chance against Hamels, so not singling you out. The Mets were doing fine and it looked like another win until El Mago got ahold of one!!!!

Baseball comes down to a lot of luck at times to whether a team a wins 85 or 95 games. Some of these teams are pretty even.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HOZER said:

I don't follow the Mets, he must make a lot of bad decisions, although I find it interesting that Vargas stuck up for him and fiercely went after the reporter

 

The player may support him but that does not mean the manager makes good decisions. In the last few weeks, Syndergaard and deGrom displayed their displeasure with the manager. Someone said Thor called the manager a name that this site is blocking (5 letter word that starts with M and ends with N). I find that hard to believe. I'll have to check. 

 

2 hours ago, HOZER said:

I also find it interesting that a lot of people act like it would have been a guaranteed win if he had left Conforto and McNeil in the lineup?

 

You don't think that having had McNeil and Conforto in the lineup would have given the Mets a better chance to score more runs?

 

I never said the Cubs were not a very good team. Actually, I thought there was a good chance the Mets might get swept.

 

Anyhow, it is how we lost rather than the loss that bothers me. Play your best players. Also, it does not make sense to send Lugo out having just had a 30+ pitches inning, especially when you have the closer Diaz who has thrown only 12 pitches in the past 7 days.

 

Anyway, something will happen. There is a news conference scheduled for tomorrow to address what happened in the locker room. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

The player may support him but that does not mean the manager makes good decisions. In the last few weeks, Syndergaard and deGrom displayed their displeasure with the manager. Someone said Thor called the manager a "*". I find that hard to believe. I'll have to check. 

 

 

You don't think that having had McNeil and Conforto in the lineup would have given the Mets a better chance to score more runs?

 

I never said the Cubs were not a very good team. Actually, I thought there was a good chance the Mets might get swept.

 

Anyhow, it is how we lost rather than the loss that bothers me. Play your best players. It does not make sense to send Lugo out having just had a 30+ pitches inning, especially when you have the closer Diaz who has thrown only 12 pitches in the past 7 days.

 

Anyway, something will happen. There is a news conference scheduled for tomorrow to address what happened in the locker room. 

I have never seen you take a loss like this. Enthusiasm is always nice sad homer simpson GIFupset homer simpson GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then why even bring Grigson up if you didn’t want to compare things under him?  Oh that’s right you were spinning to get away from your bad take that Ballard wasn’t getting much Mileage out of his draft picks and you can’t just say okay maybe I was wrong and they are getting better mileage than I first thought.  Instead you tried to twist it into something about Grigson which I didn’t even bring up.     Grigson had nothing to do with my first replay to you,  My point which you clearly missed is that this team has a lot of talent because of Ballard’s drafting over the past four years.  So much so that if they had the QB they spent three of the past four off-seasons drafting for I think they would be one of the top two or three teams in the NFL if not the best.     you then tried to make it into something about well then I have to say to the Colts were good under Grigson because they made the playoffs under him which is not at all the point I was making.  My point has been and remains is that the Colts are getting great mileage out of their draft picks under Ballard.  You are just ignoring that point because you can’t dispute it.  Is it perfect?  No, no GM is. Is it better than most teams in the NFL?  Yes.  
    • Back to the intent of the thread...........no one answered this question....so I'll answer myself to the most honest of my abilities.   Of this list, the only QB's that I would consider franchise possibles, were.....   Bledsoe - 48 starts Fitzpatrick - 53 starts   So, that means 101 starts by a franchise caliber QB in 20 years out of a total 304 starts. that is just shy of 33% of the time.   
    • Huh?  I never said that they were one of the best teams under Grigson.  And that's not same thing as agreeing they weren't.   Obviously you've gotten your circuits in a loop because of the thought that Ballard cannot separate from Grison is any of the ways you have measured so far.   How about this as a standard?  Instead of gauging Ballard's roster by assuming what he would do with Luck  (which has already been accomplished), why not simply see what he does without Luck?    You know, reality
    • I'm so old that I'm goofy and was thinking this was played in 1960. Got my time frame mixed up. I was like 11 in 1960 when we won the greatest game ever played. 
    • Yeah that’s not what I said at all about the hold overs.  Ill say it again the Colts won under Grigson solely because of Luck, TY, and the holdovers.  Ballards teams have benefited from the hold overs but he’s also found other good players over multiple drafts that have expanded the talent beyond the hold overs.     Also if you agree that the Colts weren’t one of the best teams under Grigson then you also agree with me that the Colts were not “already there” under Grigson about my original point about Ballard.  Again, my point to you was thanks to Ballard’s drafting if the Colts still had luck they would be one of if not the best teams in the league.     They don’t have him so they aren’t but that doesn’t change the fact that Ballard has done a very good job finding talent in the draft since he’s been here.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...