Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Seattle @ Washington


jvan1973

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why dont they just change the name to the Washington Native Americans?

 

Maybe they should change their name to the "indigenous people's"?  In Seattle, the city council just voted to change the name of Columbus Day to " Indigenous People's day".  Sounds pretty snappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks play against physical defenses all the time.  A lot more often than the Colts do.  Haven't crumbled yet.

They can run with Lynch and Wilson, beyond that, it's sketchy. SD took it too them, and they struggled against the woeful Redskins. If not for Wilson's constant scrambles, this offense wouldn't move past it's own 50. How can people not see this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can run with Lynch and Wilson, beyond that, it's sketchy. SD took it too them, and they struggled against the woeful Redskins. If not for Wilson's constant scrambles, this offense wouldn't move past it's own 50. How can people not see this? 

The Seahawks offense has outscored the Colts offense by significant margins in each of the past two seasons.  And they would have put up 40+ against the Skins if not for having three TDs called back, two of them on terrible calls.  Wilson has been one of the NFL's most efficient passing quarterbacks since coming into the league despite playing behind a lousy OL.  What he did against the Skins is what he always does...make plays out of nothing and throw dimes.

 

One trick pony?  The reason nobody sees this is because its laughably false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks offense has outscored the Colts offense by significant margins in each of the past two seasons.  And they would have put up 40+ against the Skins if not for having three TDs called back, two of them on terrible calls.  Wilson has been one of the NFL's most efficient passing quarterbacks since coming into the league despite playing behind a lousy OL.  What he did against the Skins is what he always does...make plays out of nothing and throw dimes.

 

One trick pony?  The reason nobody sees this is because its laughably false.

Their defense gives them ToP advantages, don't let that fact go. 

 

I'm not trying to diminish them entirely, a great team no doubt. But it's always the same act with them. They struggle to get down the field if not for the consistent escape acts of Russell "Whodini" Wilson. It was this way when we played (and beat) them last year. When they beat Denver this year, and last night. 

 

To their credit, they execute the option so well, and Wilson is a slick runner with great savvy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As awful of a game that was by Seattle, I continue to be impressed by Wilson. What a performance at the end. He strapped that penalty ridden O to his back to win that game. He is really coming into his own this season. He is the first QB in the history of Monday football to throw for over 200 yards and rush for over 100 yards. I think it is time to stop with the game manager moniker, this guy is doing much all on his own. His passer rating was 127.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle looked like a team that felt like it could just show up last night because it was the Skins. They look fat and happy to me this year coming off the SB win except for Russell Wilson who looks as hungry as ever to get another ring. Carroll better figure out how to motivate this team and stop his cheer leading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now the Seattle offense outranks its defense in points scored vs allowed. Who would have thought that 5 weeks in?

 

Yep. That is why I feel that unlike last year, if an opponent's D figures out to limit Wilson and the offense to 20 points or less, the Seahawks D of this year probably cannot pull off as many low scoring game wins as last year, IMO.

 

I don't know, I have this weird feeling about the 49ers that they won't go away easily and will still end up challenging the Seahawks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now the Seattle offense outranks its defense in points scored vs allowed. Who would have thought that 5 weeks in?

They also faced Rodgers, Rivers, and Manning in three of their four games.

The sloppiness in last night's game came primarily in the offensive line which was their major weakness last year, too. There's nothing wrong with the team's motivation. They're playing a tough schedule and get everybody's best shot and still look like the team to beat in the NFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can run with Lynch and Wilson, beyond that, it's sketchy. SD took it too them, and they struggled against the woeful Redskins. If not for Wilson's constant scrambles, this offense wouldn't move past it's own 50. How can people not see this? 

People see it. They dont know how to stop him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People see it. They dont know how to stop him.

 

Percy Harvin's health is the key to that offense. If he goes down with injury for any reason, that offense's threats and dynamic nature completely changes vs elite teams especially with Golden Tate gone. Their D was not as sharp yesterday either against Kirk Cousins, you can give a pass against Rodgers, Rivers, Peyton with regards to defensive scoring but not so much with Kirk. Let us see how they do vs the Cowboys at home, if they generate any turnovers which they have not been doing much this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also faced Rodgers, Rivers, and Manning in three of their four games.

The sloppiness in last night's game came primarily in the offensive line which was their major weakness last year, too. There's nothing wrong with the team's motivation. They're playing a tough schedule and get everybody's best shot and still look like the team to beat in the NFC.

I don't see the same mojo from them his year. I see it from Wilson. But it is still early for things to change. They can't afford any lulls especially to teams like the Skins with both the niners and cards breathing down their necks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Percy Harvin's health is the key to that offense. If he goes down with injury for any reason, that offense's threats and dynamic nature completely changes vs elite teams especially with Golden Tate gone. Their D was not as sharp yesterday either against Kirk Cousins, you can give a pass against Rodgers, Rivers, Peyton with regards to defensive scoring but not so much with Kirk. Let us see how they do vs the Cowboys at home, if they generate any turnovers which they have not been doing much this year.

Also, they are a different team away from home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the same mojo from them his year. I see it from Wilson. But it is still early for things to change. They can't afford any lulls especially to teams like the Skins with both the niners and cards breathing down their necks.

The offense looks improved despite continued poor pass protection by the OL. Wilson and Lynch have both looked great and Harvin puts a lot of stress on defenses even when he doesn't get the ball. The Hawks had 400+ yards last night and would have run up the score if not for TDs being called back by awful calls by Jeff Triplette's crew. He's the worst lead official in the league and I have no idea how he keeps his job year after year.

The defense shut down Rodgers and also Manning for the first 59 minutes of the Broncos game. Rivers just played a great game against them and made a lot of perfect throws into the narrowest of windows. Tip your cap. Giving up the long bombs to DeSean Jackson last night were uncharacteristic of the Seahawks defense but Jackson can do that to teams and give Cousins credit for putting those throws on the money.

So far the defense hasn't been generating turnovers like they did last year and I attribute some of that to the gauntlet of top shelf QBs they faced in their first three games. They had their hands on a couple of Cousins passes last night that should have been picked and will need to start making those plays. The run defense is giving up 2.6 yards per carry and has easily been the best in the league so far.

The Seahawks defense had a couple of shaky games early in the season last year also (including the Colts game) but got progressively better as the season went on and were lights out in the second half of the schedule and playoffs. We'll see if that holds true again this year or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, they are a different team away from home.

 

Yep.

 

There are 2 teams I root to not have HFA throughout the playoffs usually - they are the Patriots and the Saints. Now, I will root for the Seahawks to not have that as well :) because these teams' HFA is probably more significant/impactful than other teams' HFA, IMO. I just like a different team to win, not a fan of repeat SB winners :), a fan of spreading the wealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.

 

There are 2 teams I root to not have HFA throughout the playoffs usually - they are the Patriots and the Saints. Now, I will root for the Seahawks to not have that as well :) because these teams' HFA is probably more significant/impactful than other teams' HFA, IMO. I just like a different team to win, not a fan of repeat SB winners :), a fan of spreading the wealth.

Why do you care if any NFC team has, or doesn't have home field advantage during the playoffs? It's not like the Colts will need to visit seattle in the post season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea where you came up with that one.

So you are pleased with the way your team has looked? A loss to the Chargers, a terrible second half vs the Broncos including an 80 yard drive in less than a minute by Manning and a two point conversion to send the game to OT and then last night - a penalty brigade that almost cost you the game if not for Wilson heroics. He is the real deal by the way. Kid is as tough mentally as any QB in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are pleased with the way your team has looked?

No, but it's not a result of feeling "fat and happy" as you seem to think. Their offensive line is horrible and that was a theme last year as well. One that are gets fixed, their offense will be fine. As sloppy as they have played, they still represent the top of the league.

Sloppy play in the first part of the season is not a big deal unless it's so sloppy you are 1-3, or 0-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. Isn't there a rule that says the hair is considered part of the uniform therefore it can be pulled without a penalty?

Why don't you research that and inform everyone of your results?

I would be willing to bet that getting open by pulling the hair of the defender would be offensive pass interference, or offensive holding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol. I could care less what Sherman does with his hair but if he is going to cry like a baby when it gets pulled then probably time to cut it, no? Simple solution.

I think you're just looking for anything to use as criticism for a player you dislike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you research that and inform everyone of your results?

I would be willing to bet that getting open by pulling the hair of the defender would be offensive pass interference, or offensive holding.

I was right.

"For the record, any part of a player's hair that extends from the helmet is considered part of the uniform and is fair game for a tackler. It's known as the Ricky Williams rule for the running back who favored dreadlocks as his hairstyle. The NFL has instituted a new rule that prevents tacklers from collaring a ball carrier from behind, but that may be splitting hairs." - Pittsburgh Post-Gazzette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to admit Sherman makes it easy to dislike him. I also think he is overrated.

You can think what you want. Like Sherman would say....it doesn't matter.

Personally I like the guy. I like the fact that he says what he thinks and doesn't back away from it once he says it. You'd like him too if he played for your favorite team. Then you'd think he was the best CB in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, he's a special player. Much more than a "game manager" wouldn't you say?

I never considered the game manager title as insulting as that is what a QB is supposed to do - manage the team to a win. So many QBs today lose games for their teams, see Cutler, Romo, Eli. I think with Wilson, you have the rare combination of talent with mental toughness and a knack for making the plays to win when it counts. He is special and I think he will only get better as time goes on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can think what you want. Like Sherman would say....it doesn't matter.

Personally I like the guy. I like the fact that he says what he thinks and doesn't back away from it once he says it. You'd like him too if he played for your favorite team. Then you'd think he was the best CB in the game.

You may be right but then again I don't think Belichick would touch him with a ten foot pole. Too much of a distraction for CIA Foxboro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you care if any NFC team has, or doesn't have home field advantage during the playoffs? It's not like the Colts will need to visit seattle in the post season.

 

The Saints and the Patriots have stood in the Colts way of Lombardis, so there is a natural dislike there due to recent history, same way with Chargers too in terms of regular season and playoff wins against us.

 

Seahawks, Sherman and the LOB attitude makes it mighty hard for me to like them. Much like Brees with the Saints, Wilson is the only one on the Seahawks that I admire. Other than that, I would prefer if the Packers represented the NFC than the Seahawks. So, it is a combination of reasons as to why I root against certain teams.

 

Maybe if the Packers beat the Colts in the SB, I might start loathing them too :). But the Patriots stand alone on the loathed list mountain top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints and the Patriots have stood in the Colts way of Lombardis,

 

Seahawks, Sherman and the LOB attitude makes it mighty hard for me to like them. Much like Brees with the Saints, Wilson is the only one on the Seahawks that I admire.

 

Maybe if the Packers beat the Colts in the SB, I might start loathing them too :).

The point is, the Saints, Seahawks and Packers will not host a playoff game against Indy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may be right but then again I don't think Belichick would touch him with a ten foot pole. Too much of a distraction for CIA Foxboro.

Bellichick hasn't had that run of success lately either. Pete Carroll seems to have the ability to coach a variety of personalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is, the Saints, Seahawks and Packers will not host a playoff game against Indy.

 

My point is that I loathe the Saints and Seahawks enough that I care that they don't get HFA.

 

Not all my likes and dislikes have to be exclusively Colts related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bellichick hasn't had that run of success lately either. Pete Carroll seems to have the ability to coach a variety of personalities.

3 straight AFCCGs and a SB appearance is not a run of success?

 

I do agree though about Carroll. He has done a nice job picking the talent and then coaching it. He was horrible in NE. Ruined everything Parcells had built in just 3 short seasons but I guess he learned his lessons and is doing things the right way in Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

    • TheBlueAndWhite

      TheBlueAndWhite 154

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 342

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,136

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,434

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,279

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,410

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bravo

      Bravo 1,439

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 588

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...