TIL the Colts have an all-time winning percentage of .826 vs the Texans; a higher percentage than any other team against a divisional opponent.

[Dustin]

19-4 all time vs the Texans. 

 

 

 

[Dustin]

I'll try to get the all time record of every division up in a second. 

[Dustin]

AFCS:

 

Colts vs Texans: 19-4 (.826)

Colts vs Jags: 17-8 (.680)

Colts vs Titans: 25-13 (.658)

Texans vs Jags: 13-10 (.565)

Texans vs Titans: 9-14 (.391)

Jags vs Titans: 17-20 (.459)

[Dustin]

AFCE:

 

Patriots vs Dolphins: 44-49 (.473)

Patriots vs Bills: 64-41 (.608)

Patriots vs Jets: 54-52 (.509)

Dolphins vs Bills 56-38 (.595)

Dolphins vs Jets: 45-49 (.479)

Bills vs Jets: 55-51 (.519)

[Dustin]

AFCN:

 

Browns vs Steelers: 57-64 (.471)

Browns vs Ravens: 8-22 (.267)

Browns vs Bengals: 38-43 (.469)

Steelers vs Ravens: 20-16 (.556)

Steelers vs Bengals: 52-34 (.605)

Ravens vs Bengals: 15-20 (.4290

[Dustin]

AFCW:

 

Broncos vs Raiders: 45-59 (.434)

Broncos vs Chiefs: 51-56 (.477)

Broncos vs Chargers: 58-48 (.547)

Raider vs Chiefs: 50-54 (.481)

Raiders vs Chargers: 58-47 (.551)

Chiefs vs Chargers: 52-53 (.459)

[Dustin]

That's the AFC. Ill put the NFC up later. 

 

To be noted, Im not counting ties. Not because I don't think that they're important, just that I got all the way down to the AFCW before I realized I didn't put them in and Im too lazy to go back and fix it lol.

[adamthyst]

Where is this list from?

[Dustin]

Where is this list from?

 

PFR. Pro football reference. 

[21isSuperman]

Wow, Browns vs. Ravens is brutally one-sided

[adamthyst]

PFR. Pro football reference. 

Interesting. Some of these stats surprising the heck out of me especially for the Pats.

[Guest TeamLoloJones]

So the Colts are 61-25 vs. the rest of the AFC South...Awesome.

[Superman]

AFCN:

 

Browns vs Steelers: 57-64 (.471)

Browns vs Ravens: 8-22 (.267)

Browns vs Bengals: 38-43 (.469)

Steelers vs Ravens: 20-16 (.556)

Steelers vs Bengals: 52-34 (.605)

Ravens vs Bengals: 15-20 (.4290

 

So that means the Ravens are .733 against the Browns, right?

 

That means the Colts have the #1, #3, and #4 winning percentage against a division opponent in the AFC. Interesting. Of course, two of the teams in our division are quite new, and our division itself is new. These things tend to balance out over time, but the Colts have been pretty dominant most of the time the AFCS has been in existence. We've swept the division twice(?), I think we've only had a losing record once in 2011 (and finished 2-4), we were 3-3 in 2006... Other than that, it's been 4-2, 5-1. We're currently 4-0 against our division this year, and the two remaining games are at home.

[bap1331]

I would say .900.

I don't count those times that Curtis Painter played. That's cheating

[Vance]

I don't count those times that Peyton Manning played, that was cheating too.

[MaoBerry]

COMPLETE DOOMMIINNAATTIIOONN!!! That stat will only SWELL bigger in the coming years.

[The Old Crow]

AFCN:

Browns vs Steelers: 57-64 (.471)

Browns vs Ravens: 8-22 (.267)

Browns vs Bengals: 38-43 (.469)

Steelers vs Ravens: 20-16 (.556)

Steelers vs Bengals: 52-34 (.605)

Ravens vs Bengals: 15-20 (.4290

Ravens are 20-15 against Bengals not 15-20.

[Dustin]

Ravens are 20-15 against Bengals not 15-20.

Oops. Must have been looking at the wrong page. Sorry about that.

[The Old Crow]

Oops. Must have been looking at the wrong page. Sorry about that.

No problem, it's getting late. Just didn't want people to think we had a losing record to the Bengals.

[Qwiz]

I don't count those times that Peyton Manning played, that was cheating too.

I don't count the game that Rosenfels played. That was just unfair.

[ReMeDy]

Texans shouldn't count that last game their kicker was in either.

[GoColts8818]

I would say .900.

I don't count those times that Curtis Painter played. That's cheating

ironicly painter never played vs. the texans, Collins got the first start and Orlovsky got the other.

[GoColts8818]

I don't count the game that Rosenfels played. That was just unfair.

lol yeah he was kinda your painter so I can see that.

[amfootball]

Who cares? Houston was an expansion team. Would expect the Colts who had Manning all those years to have owned them.

[OffensivelyPC]

A lot of this has to do with how new the Texans and the Jaguars are compared to the other divisions in the NFL.  It'll take decades, but sooner or later, it would have evened out.  Still a nice little gem for any Texans fan that wants to trash the Colts, lol.