Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Browns Preseason Game Night Thread

Recommended Posts

Could the Colts... gulp... shut them out?

 

How many times have we been able to say that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could the Colts... gulp... shut them out?

 

How many times have we been able to say that?

Starters already did that.  It's taking getting our back ups in there for their starters to move the ball...kinda...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Green!  Still our back ups stopped their starters that's probably more bad news for the Browns than good news for us but hey I'll take it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Starters already did that.  It's taking getting our back ups in there for their starters to move the ball...kinda...

 

Starters got almost all the points last week, killed it this week, were winning against the Bills.

 

The Colts have a lot to look forward to in the regular season. Even though it is the preseason, they've done well against the other starters, wouldn't you say?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Starters got almost all the points last week, killed it this week, were winning against the Bills.

 

The Colts have a lot to look forward to in the regular season. Even though it is the preseason, they've done well against the other starters, wouldn't you say?

Oh yeah without question.  Our starting unit is very good.  We just have to keep them healthy because I think we are questionable in a lot of areas behind the starters but without question the starters are playing great. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we seeing the Colts becoming a Defensive team before our eyes? Dare I say it when the Colts are "on" they kinda like the Ravens teams or Pats teams early in Brady's career, very good defense with a really good QB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with your logic.  But it is the same logic some people are using for the converse.  We have young receivers and no Funchess, so no one is open.
    • Not trying to start an argument. I'm only pointing out that you are essentially drawing a conclusion based on assumptions.   1) ........receivers are fast 2) ........QB makes few attempts 3).........the box is stacked   So, Brissett must be missing open receivers downfield.   I'm sure he misses some. But how many compared to other QBs?  ....  We don't really know.         
    • SO your contention is that teams leave Ebron open because of his drops?
    • No more than someone being convicted and imprisoned when it's obvious the police force engaged in improper procedure.   I guess the issue here is that I can see the world outside my own head better than a lot of people.  And I know a little more about physics than the average bear, simply from boredom clicks that turned into self directed study sessions.    The idea that the balls were below PSI because the air was cold and cold air is denser and reduces air pressure, makes a lot more sense to me than some nefarious conspiracy, especially because the Colts' balls were also just barely under PSI, and we all know Andrew Luck doesn't cheat.   The way I had it explained to me is the Patriots keep their balls at the low end of the allowed PSI limit at room temperature.  Throw in a super cold January evening that was way below room temperature and the nefarious becomes the inevitable.  That's why the Colts' balls were also low, because air cold enough to shrink a Patriots ball will shrink a Colts ball too.    The reason that the Colts' balls had higher PSI is that they started higher -- Colts don't push the lower edge of the PSI limit.  Also the Colts balls were tested later, after things had a chance to warm up and normalize   If it was Manning or Luck being accused none of us would have been satisfied with the standard of "proof" on display.    there might just barely be enough actual evidence to get the equipment people themselves on something, if you completely ignore the way temperature affects air pressure, but the evidence tying any of that directly back to Brady is practically nonexistent.   They would have had a better reason to suspend either of Robert Kraft or Bill Belichick than Tom Brady.  Both of them have more authority over the equipment personnel than the starting QB does and at least you could get them on the commander clause. '   All they have on Brady is that he destroyed his phone after they said they didn't want it and before they changed their minds and decided they did
    • I was going to respond to each point but it's not really worth it so I will just say, the fact that he was suspended and fined was not proof enough for you?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...