Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Cliff Avril Going to Seahawks


Recommended Posts

Meh. I wanted him, but once we picked up Waldon and Sidbury he became unneeded. Sounds like they wanted an OLB that could stop the run and drop into coverage, which is what Waldon can do. Avril and Kruger couldn't. I'd take Waldon over Kruger any day anyways. Avril would have been questionable as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. I wanted him, but once we picked up Waldon and Sidbury he became unneeded. Sounds like they wanted an OLB that could stop the run and drop into coverage, which is what Waldon can do. Avril and Kruger couldn't. I'd take Waldon over Kruger any day anyways. Avril would have been questionable as well.

1. Sidbury is an ILB, right?

2. Walden hardly makes the position no longer a need.

3. Walden over Kruger and Avril? :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Sidbury is an ILB, right?

2. Walden hardly makes the position no longer a need.

3. Walden over Kruger and Avril? :facepalm:

I know many are backing what we have done the last 2 days.. But I'm still shocked. I like Toler and Thomas. But I've seen a lot of concern with Cherilus knee and not sold on Walden like many seem to be. Expected more to say the least

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know many are backing what we have done the last 2 days.. But I'm still shocked. I like Toler and Thomas. But I've seen a lot of concern with Cherilus knee and not sold on Walden like many seem to be. Expected more to say the least

I'd say Walden is a stop gap and will not be starting in 3 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it just goes to show that Avril wasn't highly thought of by the people that actually know what they are doing.

I agree with that. I now believe mgmt didn't view him as a viable 3-4 fit. I do like that Mathis is moving to the Rush LB and Walden will set the edge. I think Mathis will excel in that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Sidbury is an ILB, right?

2. Walden hardly makes the position no longer a need.

3. Walden over Kruger and Avril? :facepalm:

Yes. I have made it no secret that I think Kruger is completely terrible. Like I said, I wanted Avril. Never once in my previous post did I say I preferred Waldon over Avril. We couldn't prove Avril would work in our system.

 

Secondly, No idea what Sidbury is. I just know he wasn't even in a 4-3, so it is questionable what he will be changing to.

Third, Grigson said he signed these people to compete for the starting position. Why would he be willing to pay 16m if he was going to bring in someone else as well? It's not a need anymore as far as free agency goes. Draft, sure. Get Damontre Moore. The pass rushers in this FA weren't worth the cash they wanted. We have Hughes and Waldon as a backup plan if anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had actually never seen the specific comments about diabetes until this Destin article...or Part 1 of this Bob McGinn article for that matter. I knew some things were said though and Ballard didn't like it.   But now that I have read Destin's article and McGinn's article, I just don't agree with the narrative Destin is pushing here. He's trying to portray AD as a R1 talent who was unfairly treated by the rumor-mongering media, which caused teams to not draft him until R2.   But we all know it doesn't really work like that anymore. And McGinn's article has additional not-so-flattering comments from scouts during AD's Combine workout (not just his diabetes management or coachability). So we know a glimpse into what some scouts were thinking back as far as the Combine, which was well before McGinn even published this article in mid April.   The bigger picture for me is "man, that sure seems like a lot of discouraging comments from scouts." And McGinn didn't have an agenda...he just happened to have more material on AD Mitchell than others and he published it.         
    • I think I was wrong in my guess here. On later inspection, it seems like the more likely situation is that the part about his diabetes is still in this article, but it's just hidden behind a paywall.. 
    • That could have happened. Could have been a HIPAA issue too.   But I think the fact that these other quotes existed (even if they were put in later) adds necessary context to this situation. It wasn't just AD being the victim of some smear campaign that somehow heavily influenced NFL teams...as seems to be the narrative. Instead, there were also concerns among different scouts (assuming it wasn't one scout) about other aspects, including his Combine workout.   So we know what some thought...and we know what happened. 10 teams drafted WRs before AD. Yes, 3 of those WRs were going earlier than him no matter what, but 7 other WR-needy teams opted for other WRs. And even Ballard actually traded down with him on the board. It seems fairly safe to assume that NFL teams didn't have him as a R1 WR, or top 5 at the position, for reasons beyond a couple comments from anonymous scouts. 
    • Cardinals need to sweep the Marlins in their 3 game series.  At minimum win 2/3.   It's a chance they cannot mess up.
    • Honestly, isn't that kind of a base level journalistic integrity and ethics? I don't think he's setting up some arbitrary litmus test. I'm no journalist and have no idea what the professional standard is, but this to me seems like a pretty reasonable standard - if you are writing about someone and a source is sharing pretty disparaging information that might affect the subject to the tune of millions of dollars, the least you should probably do is to ask for comment from said subject, before you print that information.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...