Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Best of both worlds


jemack

Recommended Posts

Ok, so far AR isn't the Jalen Hurts the Colts hoped for. And he isn't going anywhere for the next couple of years. Flacco seems to have a decent grasp of the offense so why not interchange the two during the games. From what I've seen, it doesn't take Flacco long to find his throwing rhythm. And AR will still get his experience.

I think it would be our best short term solution for winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JediXMan said:

Winning what getting blasted as the 7 seed in the WC? This team isn’t close to being contender.

So it's SB or bust for you? It must be excruciating for you to be a sports fan.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jemack said:

So it's SB or bust for you? It must be excruciating for you to be a sports fan.

 

A lot of people believe playing Flacco will come at the expense of developing AR. I firmly believe you have to let him play through the bad and let him work it out.  There is a saying that if you have two starting QBs, you really have none. Flacco was brought in here to back up AR if he is injured. That’s basically it unless AR absolutely implodes and clearly shows he shouldnt be in the game. We aren’t there and not really close. 
 

I say all this as someone who thinks AR is never going to be a franchise QB and it was a huge mistake to draft him. Still, the Colts did and have a plan for him so I’m on board. It’s what the team is doing so we should probably just accept it.  Richardson is playing until he sinks or swims. I’m ok with that. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

A lot of people believe playing Flacco will come at the expense of developing AR. I firmly believe you have to let him play through the bad and let him work it out.  There is a saying that if you have two starting QBs, you really have none. Flacco was brought in here to back up AR if he is injured. That’s basically it unless AR absolutely implodes and clearly shows he shouldnt be in the game. We aren’t there and not really close. 
 

I say all this as someone who thinks AR is never going to be a franchise QB and it was a huge mistake to draft him. Still, the Colts did and have a plan for him so I’m on board. It’s what the team is doing so we should probably just accept it.  Richardson is playing until he sinks or swims. I’m ok with that. 
 

 

And that's fine, for you.  But does anyone know what this plan is? Hope?

The window will be closing soon for JT and we have nothing close to his level. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jemack said:

And that's fine, for you.  But does anyone know what this plan is? Hope?

The window will be closing soon for JT and we have nothing close to his level. 

Exactly what I've been silently thinking 😞 JT is really good. But how many years will we have with him?

 

This team would've been soooo good if luck is gutted out his dark time 😔. We have a long road ahead.. had a QB and nothing else and just swapped.. it'll swap again in a few years

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

Exactly what I've been silently thinking 😞 JT is really good. But how many years will we have with him?

 

This team would've been soooo good if luck is gutted out his dark time 😔. We have a long road ahead.. had a QB and nothing else and just swapped.. it'll swap again in a few years

Cheer up, buckaroo. Ballard will find us a RB gem through FA. 😂

Seriously, we feel you pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

A lot of people believe playing Flacco will come at the expense of developing AR. I firmly believe you have to let him play through the bad and let him work it out.  There is a saying that if you have two starting QBs, you really have none. Flacco was brought in here to back up AR if he is injured. That’s basically it unless AR absolutely implodes and clearly shows he shouldnt be in the game. We aren’t there and not really close. 
 

I say all this as someone who thinks AR is never going to be a franchise QB and it was a huge mistake to draft him. Still, the Colts did and have a plan for him so I’m on board. It’s what the team is doing so we should probably just accept it.  Richardson is playing until he sinks or swims. I’m ok with that. 
 

 

Regarding we aren't there and we're not really close - I'm not sure I agree with that. I don't think Richardson can afford to turn the home fans and the media against him but things are trending in that direction. Somebody needs to give him some media relations coaching this week and he needs to take it to heart. He can't complete only 10 passes in a full game, have the tapping out thing, lose the game, and then talk with a smile on his face about how he feels he's a great passer, has been a QB his whole life, is the second best rushing QB, and is a different kind of quarterback then everyone else. If he has more games and post-games like yesterday, it's going to get really ugly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BeanDiasucci said:

Regarding we aren't there and we're not really close - I'm not sure I agree with that. I don't think Richardson can afford to turn the home fans and the media against him but things are trending in that direction. Somebody needs to give him some media relations coaching this week and he needs to take it to heart. He can't complete only 10 passes in a full game, have the tapping out thing, lose the game, and then talk with a smile on his face about how he feels he's a great passer, has been a QB his whole life, is the second best rushing QB, and is a different kind of quarterback then everyone else. If he has more games and post-games like yesterday, it's going to get really ugly.  

I believe if this game were played at LOS, he and the offense (aside from JT) would have been booed. From what I've seen, AR seems to be a fine young man. But this last presser, he seemed defensive and a bit of a narcissist. The key to growing as a person and a QB is to hear yourself say "There needs to be improvement on my part". Hearing it from coaches and fans does nothing for his development.

Here's hoping pride doesn't become a factor, like with Jeff George.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AwesomeAustin said:

A lot of people believe playing Flacco will come at the expense of developing AR. I firmly believe you have to let him play through the bad and let him work it out.  There is a saying that if you have two starting QBs, you really have none. Flacco was brought in here to back up AR if he is injured. That’s basically it unless AR absolutely implodes and clearly shows he shouldnt be in the game. We aren’t there and not really close. 
 

I say all this as someone who thinks AR is never going to be a franchise QB and it was a huge mistake to draft him. Still, the Colts did and have a plan for him so I’m on board. It’s what the team is doing so we should probably just accept it.  Richardson is playing until he sinks or swims. I’m ok with that. 
 

 

 

I agree that you have to play AR, and that was the plan from the beginning.  Ballard confirmed it by not bringing in experienced DBs to help the young secondary.  

 

I won't agree with you YET that AR is never going to be a franchise QB.  He has less experience than any QB in the NFL if you count their college games.  He's no Andrew Luck, not too many are, but our hope is that he's a Josh Allen who took a couple years to develop.

 

And I'm convinced that Shane is splitting his play calling - some strictly to help develop AR into a passer at the detriment of moving the sticks.  I think that's why we don't see AR using his real gifts until the second half when we're usually behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I whole heartedly agree, if you look at what Buffalo does with Josh Allen they do that well. They install an offense that plays to the strengths of his skillset. It just seems that Shane and Bob are caught up in trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. I get what Shane did with Jalen Hurts but he needs to understand they are two completely different players and should be treated as such. 
    • Outside of a couple that were decent, there wasn't a good throw in the bunch.  The term drop seems subjective.    These also don't seem to be demanded first read throws.  It looks like AR chose difficult throws, with more open receivers evident in most patterns.   But I'm sure Shane told him to throw the ball to the receiver he did....via voice in ARs helmet during the play.
    • Ryan Kelly said they had a conversation about Anthony Richardson leaving the field for a play and that AR realizes "That's not the standard he needs to live up to." He said criticism is warranted for that moment. But he reiterated that he plays hard pretty consistently. To recap, Shane Steichen on Anthony Richardson: - He is QB1 as of today - But for who starts Sunday vs. the Vikings? "We're evaluating." - Tapping out for a play didn't factor into the need for evaluation, though he also said it can't happen
    • Once again you are ASSUMING. There have been plenty of games where we have seen teams have 40 or more seconds on the clock and they’ll just take it to the half. When AR threw the interception it was 3rd and 3 there was exactly 34 seconds on the clock had they kneeled the ball on the second and third down. Even IF Houston used their timeouts you would’ve likely left them with around MAYBE give or take 28 seconds on the clock. WITHOUT timeouts therefore they have to either utilize the sideline or clock the play. The chances of them being able to get 6 points is less than 10% the chances of them being able to secure 3 points is about 30-40%. Regardless I would rather give up a Field Goal over the 7 points the conceded. Everything you’re trying to explain is based on an ASSUMPTION that Houston would have used their time outs. 
  • Members

    • DavePSL

      DavePSL 188

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 4,043

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 828

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 2,491

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Qwiz

      Qwiz 205

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsbluefan

      Coltsbluefan 225

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BeanDiasucci

      BeanDiasucci 999

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,496

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,542

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 4,485

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...