Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

PFF Scores week 2

Solid84

By Solid84
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

w87r Ring of Honor

w87r

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


Slight correction:  I believe Fries is the 6th highest rated guard of week 2.   But I don’t believe he’s the 6th highest rated guard overall thru the first two weeks.   Not after his first week where Fries was ranked 42nd overall.  

He was #1 or #2 rated guard this week, with a 90+ PFF grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
w87r Ring of Honor

w87r

Posted
Posted
Just now, NewColtsFan said:


Do if I understand you correctly, his score of 74 is his score thru two weeks and comes after a second week score of 90+ ??

 

Ok….   Sorry, that wasn’t clear to me.  Thnx 

Yeah, that's been my take on the non premium grades.

 

 

They are season long grades that go up and down throughout the year based on performance, obviously.

 

Weekly numbers and other in-depth options are locked for premium viewing. Thought about getting it, still debating, but probably won't. $120/yr? Lol.

 

 

 

And yeah, so Ryan Kelly is grading out as the #1 Center in the league for the season right now. I know we weren't talking about him, but wanted to give him an extra shout for coming back strong.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

Does someone have the specifically week 2 grades for all of the players?

Offense

QB 

  • Richardson 73.2 (Pass: 69.6 - Run: 67.0)
  • Minshew 76.8 (Pass: 81.0 - Run: 48.0)

 

Oline

  • Raimann 76.5 (Pblk: 76.3 - Rblk: 73.3)
  • Nelson 56.3 (Pblk: 88.4 - Rblk: 51.7)
  • Kelly 87.3 (Pblk: 83.1 - Rblk: 87.4)
  • French 46.6 (Pblk: 63.4 - Rblk: 54.0)
  • Fries 90.3 (Pblk: 59.5 - Rblk: 92.0)
  • Smith 74.2 (Pblk: 63.6 - Rblk: 89.6)

 

WR

  • Downs 73.5 (Recv: 72.9 - Rblk: 55.2)
  • McKenzie 68.2 (Recv: 81.3 - Rblk: 60.0)
  • Pierce 56.0 (Recv: 55.6 - Rblk: 59.2)
  • Pittman 54.6 (Recv: 55.0 - Rblk: 53.8)

 

TE

  • Mallory 88.3 (Recv: 89.6 - Rblk: 60.7)
  • Cox 65.0 (Recv: 68.0 - Pblk: 70.2 - Rblk: 57.2)
  • Granson 51.4 (Recv: 54.2 - Pblk: 70.2 - Rblk: 58.9)

 

RB

  • Moss 63.6

 

I can do the defense later if you want?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
John Hammonds Ring of Honor

John Hammonds

Posted
Posted
Just now, Solid84 said:

Offense

QB 

  • Richardson 73.2 (Pass: 69.6 - Run: 67.0)
  • Minshew 76.8 (Pass: 81.0 - Run: 48.0)

 

Oline

  • Raimann 76.5 (Pblk: 76.3 - Rblk: 73.3)
  • Nelson 56.3 (Pblk: 88.4 - Rblk: 51.7)
  • Kelly 87.3 (Pblk: 83.1 - Rblk: 87.4)
  • French 46.6 (Pblk: 63.4 - Rblk: 54.0)
  • Fries 90.3 (Pblk: 59.5 - Rblk: 92.0)
  • Smith 74.2 (Pblk: 63.6 - Rblk: 89.6)

 

WR

  • Downs 73.5 (Recv: 72.9 - Rblk: 55.2)
  • McKenzie 68.2 (Recv: 81.3 - Rblk: 60.0)
  • Pierce 56.0 (Recv: 55.6 - Rblk: 59.2)
  • Pittman 54.6 (Recv: 55.0 - Rblk: 53.8)

 

TE

  • Mallory 88.3 (Recv: 89.6 - Rblk: 60.7)
  • Cox 65.0 (Recv: 68.0 - Pblk: 70.2 - Rblk: 57.2)
  • Granson 51.4 (Recv: 54.2 - Pblk: 70.2 - Rblk: 58.9)

 

RB

  • Moss 63.6

 

I can do the defense later if you want?

 

 

 

Yes, please.  And You Rock!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TigerColt Active Roster

TigerColt

Posted
Posted

G - Brady Christensen CAR - 51.4 / 57.5

 

G - Chandler Zavala  CAR - 23.0 / 52.7

 

T - Taylor Moton CAR - 71.3 / 66.6

 

T - Ikem Ekwonu CAR - 68.5 / 76.3

 

 

Hmmm.  It's early but I'm seeing a trend here.  Franks' OL schemes at Carolina shows a decline in OL performance.  Especially the guards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKB Ring of Honor

AKB

Posted
Posted

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

Baker - 44.8(87/92), 32.6(97/98)

 

 

CUT HIM

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKB Ring of Honor

AKB

Posted
Posted
On 9/18/2023 at 5:11 PM, Superman said:

 

Coverage is a definite sore spot. They're rangy and active, Leonard in particular has great length, but none of them are great in coverage.

 

Same thing kind of applies to the entire back end. Lots of traits from these guys, they compete, and they're even around the ball a lot more than I expected. Much better than early last season in coverage, IMO. Some tough stretches in the second half yesterday... But straight up covering your man, we don't really have anyone who excels at that. 

Okereke was our best coverage backer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Fluke_33 said:

How do you have an overall grade higher than the individual performance grades?

same for downs

Richardson also has a Fumble score of 73.6 which figured in. I just thought it was irrelevant considering he didn’t fumble. 
 

Downs has a drop score as well but, bo drops, so… haha

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Defense

DI

  • Buckner 61.6 (Rdef: 61.3 - Tack: 72.2 - Prsh: 61.5 - Cov: 57.2)
  • Stewart 73.3 (Rdef: 79.1 - Tack: 71.5 - Prsh: 66.8 - Cov: 59.5)
  • Bryan 65.6 (Rdef: 50.7 - Tack: 67.4 - Prsh: 78.9 - Cov: ---)
  • Johnson 63.6 (Rdef: 44.5 - Tack: 67.3 - Prsh: 84.8 - Cov: ---)

 

ED

  • Martin 82.7 (Rdef: 69.8 - Tack: 69.2 - Prsh: 75.6 - Cov: ---)
  • Paye 72.3 (Rdef: 67.0 - Tack: 74.7 - Prsh: 67.2 - Cov: 61.1)
  • Ebukam 69.8 (Rdef: 71.1 - Tack: 71.2 - Prsh: 62.7 - Cov: 60.0)
  • Lewis 56.2 (Rdef: 72.7 - Tack: 38.6 - Prsh: 53.7 - Cov: ---)
  • Odeyingbo 43.0 (Rdef: 42.0 - Tack: 71.2 - Prsh: 69.3 - Cov: ---)

 

LB

  • Speed 48.5 (Rdef: 77.1 - Tack: 37.0 - Prsh: 70.8 - Cov: 29.7)
  • Franklin 52.7 (Rdef: 51.8 - Tack: 37.4 - Prsh: 50.7 - Cov: 58.1)
  • Leonard 74.0 (Rdef: 72.5 - Tack: 79.1 - Prsh: 59.4 - Cov: 67.8)
  • Stuard 60.0 - Only had 1 snap

 

CB

  • Brown 78.3 - Only had 1 snap
  • Moore 68.3 (Rdef: 67.3 - Tack: 83.3 - Prsh: 72.9 - Cov: 65.1)
  • Jones 60.0 - Only had 1 snap
  • Flowers 64.5 (Rdef: 65.3 - Tack: 27.1 - Prsh: --- - Cov: 63.4)
  • Baker 33.0 (Rdef: 61.5 - Tack: 25.5 - Prsh: --- - Cov: 30.2)

 

S

  • Blackmon 67.6 (Rdef: 77.3 - Tack: 85.0 - Prsh: 56.6 - Cov: 61.4)
  • Cross 60.5 - Only had 4 snaps
  • Thomas 59.9 (Rdef: 64.0 - Tack: 83.6 - Prsh: --- - Cov: 58.4)
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
throwing BBZ Ring of Honor

throwing BBZ

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, sb41champs said:

Thanks for posting.

 

It is good to see progress from week 1 to week 2.

 

That is my personal hope for the remainder of the year - weekly progress and unit stability.

 

 Hopefully we do stay healthy and block well week after week.

 We had a variety of blocking combinations that our guys Could Do. Steichen and his coaches are do a few atta boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I need someone to explain this to me.

I can't. It doesn't really make sense in my opinion. There is a grade for Fumbles and Drops. 60.0 is the baseline - the average, but for whatever reason it can go higher? I don't know if it's because a defender had a play on the ball but Richardson/Downs avoided? It's a weird grade in my opinion.

 

 

EDIT:

The abreviation for the grade is FUM. The explanation is "PFF Grade for HandsFumble". Doesn't really help me though..

 

Downs actually had a grade for both FUM and Drops. Explanation for Drops is "PFF Grade for HandsDrop".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Solid84 Ring of Honor

Solid84

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, so I looked up the Drops on pff.com hoping to find and explanation:

 

Quote

Drop Rate

Drop rate is another individualized statistic for receivers (or any pass-catcher for that matter) as it takes into account the amount of catchable targets thrown a receiver's way against the amount of dropped passes on those catchable targets. This isolates the amount of actual passes that could be caught by a receiver, not the amount of total targets, and produces a better mark of how ‘sure' a receiver's hands are a given game, season, career.

Drops seems to be a meassure of how good a receivers hands were based on number of catches among catchable throws rather than targets.

 

Couldn't find anything on the FUM grade, but seeing as the explanation for it is "PFF Grade for HandsFumble" I'd guess it's a meassure of how good a runners hands were - how well they protected the ball during contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...