Bleacher reports best and worst top 3 Colts picks

[Indeee]

BR is spot on for what I'm personally calling for. I posted a few days ago I thought that our choice would be determined on what the Steelers do and BR is backing me up.. sort of

 

Marcus Peters at 29 (based on Steelers taking Collins or Johnson from Wake)

Preston Smith round 2

Abdullah Round 3

 

Best case scenarios

 

I would be happy with first 2, not sure about Abdullah as I don't know much about him

 

I would peg in Smith from Fresno in round 3 and I would be extremely overjoyed

[Archer]

Love the Round 1 position, dislike the rest.  Peters would not be on my draft board due to his interpersonal/character concerns.  I wouldn't take those kind of risks in Round 1 unless there was a clear athletic upgrade over all other possibilities, but in this case Jalen Collins or Kevin Johnson or three or four OTs that could drop would be better alternatives...

[krunk]

We'll see what happens, but I'm paying closer attention to who the Colts are actually working out and the amount of times they've seen the prospect.  Things can change, but to me if one of those prospects they've paid a fair amount of attention to is available at 29 that is who I think they will pick from.  Haven't seen them pay much attention to Peters, but it doesn't mean they haven't or won't.  I think if Darby is available at #29 and his BPA on the Colts board that is who they will take based on the attention they've paid so far.  Just my take but I know it's not 100 percent.

[crazycolt1]

I think Grigson beats to his own drum and more than likely will go with players none of us will agree on. It will be a welcome change in debate other than the boring stuff that has been in here the last few weeks. I really don't pay much attention to mock drafts because the only one that matters is in the opinion of those who are picking for real.

[COLTS449]

I don't get this at all. I mean how is this a good scenario? Our three major needs are D-Line, Safety, and O-Line. This wouldn't fix any of those holes.

[Dustin]

I think Grigson beats to his own drum and more than likely will go with players none of us will agree on. It will be a welcome change in debate other than the boring stuff that has been in here the last few weeks. I really don't pay much attention to mock drafts because the only one that matters is in the opinion of those who are picking for real.

Thanks a lot captain obvious.

[Archer]

I don't get this at all. I mean how is this a good scenario? Our three major needs are D-Line, Safety, and O-Line. This wouldn't fix any of those holes.

 

That's what you think the needs are...not everyone agrees.  I personally believe that CB is one of the top three needs, and DL is not...

[crazycolt1]

Thanks a lot captain obvious.

No problem. When you just need a reality check let me know.

[Dustin]

No problem. When you just need a reality check let me know.

 

"Grigson is going to pick who he wants to"

 

Thanks for dropping that bombshell on us. 

[crazycolt1]

"Grigson is going to pick who he wants to"

 

Thanks for dropping that bombshell on us. 

So you choose to omit my full comment to what? My comment was made in the context of the thread. But you seem to have a problem with what I said so that's on you. I really don't care one way or another.  If you have a problem with my comments it's easy, don't reply. It was a general comment that was not directed to you but you seem to have to chime in with a sarcastic comment. You think that makes you funny? You think that makes you smarter? IMO all it does is make you seem immature and childish.