Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Week 13 Around-the-NFL Game Thread, December 5, 2021


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

Oh.. but if we beat pats head to head it doesn't matter if we are tied right?

If only us and Pats were tied head to head but when multiple teams tied goes to AFC record unless one team beat all the others tied with. Likely will be a lot of teams 10-7 or 9-8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

7-0 KC.

 

If we end up with the 7th seed we might have to play in NE. I like how we play on the road but that is one place I do not want to go.

 

We are going to have to beat a winning team at some point in our lives, might as well fancy our chances against a rookie with no playoff experience as opposed to a hungry Bills team that wants revenge on us and is more battle tested having played a division winner schedule vs KC and Titans. I'd rather play a team that is easier to run on than a team that is harder to run on, so that it gives us the best matchups, so I would take the Patriots over the Bills on that front because the Mac Jones rookie run ride will end at some point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Colts really are in good shape no matter what happens tomorrow night. Bills lose and they play Tampa next Sunday. Could put colts ahead of Bills. If bills win against NE us beating pats will put colts ahead. We are in great shape.

Really and the pats and bills are gonna feast on each other the next few weeks. Bills get Bucs while we get patriots if we can beat them I'll feel good about our chances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

Really and the pats and bills are gonna feast on each other the next few weeks. Bills get Bucs while we get patriots if we can beat them I'll feel good about our chances

We would probably be better off with a pats win tomorrow but either way is good.

 

Titans are playing jags. They should win but Titans are really struggling and that jags defense can give teams issues. Titans then have SF when we play NE. So will be watching those two games. If for some reason Titans would lose both and Colts best Ne we are tied with 3 games to go with TN having tiebreaker. 
 

SF is  in the WC race so that will keep them motivated against a injured Bengals team next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wentzszn said:

We would probably be better off with a pats win tomorrow but either way is good.

 

Titans are playing jags. They should win but Titans are really struggling and that jags defense can give teams issues. Titans then have SF when we play NE. So will be watching those two games. If for some reason Titans would lose both and Colts best Ne we are tied with 3 games to go with TN having tiebreaker. 

The more I think about it, we just need to win out and not worry about the other crap around us. We go 11-6, we have a 97% chance of making the playoffs per ESPN odds because of the scheduling. That means a lot would have to go wrong for us not get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, coltsfan_canada said:

Nick Sirianni vs Frank

 

Whose team has better chance to make it to playoffs?

 

Also who has talented team?

 

Big win by Eagles 

 

QB is the issue. Bench Hurts, play Minshew, get the most out of your pass catchers. Other than a sorry poor man's Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts can't throw down the seams, just outside the numbers vs 1-on-1 coverage and is spottily accurate at best. He is like a Tim Tebow where he needs college like separation to hit his WRs in stride. Minshew gets more out of them and thus they don't see loaded boxes vs the run either. If Minshew plays the rest of the way, they have a chance to make the playoffs at best, still not division winning talent like the Colts are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

Number 1seed Patriots.. Brady and bill sold Their souls

 

No kidding. But on the bright side, if we make it in as a #7 seed, let our revenge tour start with the Ravens at #2 and then the Titans at #3 seeding. I can always dream. :) 

 

Patriots

Ravens

Titans

Chargers (still not sold on Chiefs offense this year)

Bills

Chiefs

Colts

 

That would be nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

No kidding. But on the bright side, if we make it in as a #7 seed, let our revenge tour start with the Ravens at #2 and then the Titans at #3 seeding. I can always dream. :) 

 

Patriots

Ravens

Titans

Chargers (still not sold on Chiefs offense this year)

Bills

Chiefs

Colts

 

That would be nice. 

We wouldn't even see the titans until the afccg is those were the standings.. the 7seed gets punished bad for getting the 7th seed.. play number 2 immediately followed by playing the 1seed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

We wouldn't even see the titans until the afccg is those were the standings.. the 7seed gets punished bad for getting the 7th seed.. play number 2 immediately followed by playing the 1seed

 

Oh yeah, I forgot about that, you are right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wentzszn said:

Colts really are in good shape no matter what happens tomorrow night. Bills lose and they play Tampa next Sunday. Could put colts ahead of Bills. If bills win against NE us beating pats will put colts ahead. We are in great shape.

I don't really agree.   Just because we are dependent on other teams losing.   We do not control our destiny yet.  We could win out and not make it into the playoffs.   Odds are we would, but it's not for certain yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2021 at 11:20 PM, Myles said:

I don't really agree.   Just because we are dependent on other teams losing.   We do not control our destiny yet.  We could win out and not make it into the playoffs.   Odds are we would, but it's not for certain yet.  

I have done what I think are all the scenarios, and I do believe if the Colts win out they are in. Even though they are not in at the moment, the other contenders have a lot of games vs each other, and we would eventually jump anywhere from 5-7 seed.  

 

Colts win out = 11-6 (this eliminates Raiders and gives NE 5th loss)

Week 14 - Ravens v Browns  

Week 15 - KC v LAC,  Bengals v Broncos,  Tenn v Pitt

Week 16 - Ravens v Bengals,  Pitt v KC, Buff v NE

Week 17 - KC v Bengals,  Broncos v LAC,  Browns v Pitt

Week 18 - Pitt v Ravens,  Bengals v Browns, KC v Broncos,  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2021 at 11:20 PM, Myles said:

I don't really agree.   Just because we are dependent on other teams losing.   We do not control our destiny yet.  We could win out and not make it into the playoffs.   Odds are we would, but it's not for certain yet.  

Because so many teams play each other that are in the wild card hunt we will.  Tiebreakers would be huge for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, coltsva said:

I have done what I think are all the scenarios, and I do believe if the Colts win out they are in. Even though they are not in at the moment, the other contenders have a lot of games vs each other, and we would eventually jump anywhere from 5-7 seed.  

 

Colts win out = 11-6 (this eliminates Raiders and gives NE 5th loss)

Week 14 - Ravens v Browns  

Week 15 - KC v LAC,  Bengals v Broncos,  Tenn v Pitt

Week 16 - Ravens v Bengals,  Pitt v KC, Buff v NE

Week 17 - KC v Bengals,  Broncos v LAC,  Browns v Pitt

Week 18 - Pitt v Ravens,  Bengals v Browns, KC v Broncos,  

 

 

I think you are correct now.   If we win out we will be in. 

I think it is needless thinking at this time as I don't think they will win out.   But that's just my thinking and not certain.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Myles said:

I think you are correct now.   If we win out we will be in. 

I think it is needless thinking at this time as I don't think they will win out.   But that's just my thinking and not certain.  

I think the Colts are good enough to win out. It’s just hard to feel confident about any 7-6 team doing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Myles said:

I think you are correct now.   If we win out we will be in. 

I think it is needless thinking at this time as I don't think they will win out.   But that's just my thinking and not certain.  

If Bengals, Chargers, Bills won out we would miss the playoffs. But what I don’t know is if those three teams play each other at all where it guarantees a win for us. I don’t think those 3 teams will win out though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

If Bengals, Chargers, Bills won out we would miss the playoffs. But what I don’t know is if those three teams play each other at all where it guarantees a win for us. I don’t think those 3 teams will win out though. 

No those 3 teams don't play each other the rest of the way but you are not going to have to worry about any of those teams winning out anyway. If that happens I am playing the lottery. Bills still play at Tampa and at GB. Chargers still play the Chiefs, they beat the Chiefs last time so the likely of Mahomes getting swept is slim and none and Slim left the building. Bengals still play the 49ers, at Ravens, at Browns. 

 

10-7 will get us in at least as a 7th seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

No those 3 teams don't play each other the rest of the way but you are not going to have to worry about any of those teams winning out anyway. If that happens I am playing the lottery. Bills still play at Tampa and at GB. Chargers still play the Chiefs, they beat the Chiefs last time so the likely of Mahomes getting swept is slim and none and Slim left the building. Bengals still play the 49ers, at Ravens, at Browns. 

 

10-7 will get us in at least as a 7th seed.

Bills don’t play GB. They play at NE. Which is what I think you meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the way it plays out is:

 

Chiefs will get the #1 seed at 12-5.

 

Pats will get the #2 seed at 11-6, they have the tie breaker over the Titans.

 

Titans will get the #3 seed at 11-6 = they have a cupcake schedule the rest of the way but like I said the Pats have the tiebreaker over them.

 

Ravens will get the #4 seed at 11-6 = Titans have tiebreaker over the Ravens.

 

WildCards

 #5 seed Chargers = 11-6, I can see them losing only 1 more that is to KC.

#6 seed Bengals = 10-7

#7 seed Colts = 10-7. I have us losing at Cards. I think we upset the Pats if people want to call it that and we manhandle the Raiders and Jags.

 

Others

#8 seed Bills = 10-7, Colts own tiebreaker over them.

 

Looking at the other teams schedules = Browns, Raiders, Broncos, and Steelers, I can't see any of them winning 10 games. We need the Bills to lose and we will be good. I can't see them winning at Tampa or at NE. If they do win one of those games, it will get dicey.

 

 

 

 

13 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Bills don’t play GB. They play at NE. Which is what I think you meant. 

Yeah I meant at NE :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I think the way it plays out is:

 

Chiefs will get the #1 seed at 12-5.

 

Pats will get the #2 seed at 11-6, they have the tie breaker over the Titans.

 

Titans will get the #3 seed at 11-6 = they have a cupcake schedule the rest of the way but like I said the Pats have the tiebreaker over them.

 

Ravens will get the #4 seed at 11-6 = Titans have tiebreaker over the Ravens.

 

WildCards

 #5 seed Chargers = 11-6, I can see them losing only 1 more that is to KC.

#6 seed Bengals = 10-7

#7 seed Colts = 10-7. I have us losing at Cards. I think we upset the Pats if people want to call it that and we manhandle the Raiders and Jags.

 

Others

#8 seed Bills = 10-7, Colts own tiebreaker over them.

 

Looking at the other teams schedules = Browns, Raiders, Broncos, and Steelers, I can't see any of them winning 10 games. We need the Bills to lose and we will be good. I can't see them winning at Tampa or at NE. If they do win one of those games, it will get dicey.

 

 

 

 

Yeah I meant at NE :thmup:

 

Most likely, on a short week game, Chargers beat KC on TNF to take the AFC West, that will be their defining and shocker moment of the 2021 season, just wait. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Most likely, on a short week game, Chargers beat KC on TNF to take the AFC West, that will be their defining and shocker moment of the 2021 season, just wait. 

Even if they do it won't affect us because I have both making the playoffs anyway but I don't see it. MaHomes getting swept is almost like Belichick or Peyton losing to a team 2 times in a row, it rarely happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

What’s crazy is in 2020 colts had to take it to the last game to get that 7th seed with 5 losses. If the number one seed has five losses that would be crazy.  The AFC is so wide open it’s nuts. There is not one dominate team.

It is going to boil down to us and the Jags again, they always play us tough but we are the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read something that said the leaked scores were only partial. And now that I'm thinking about it more, I think they were saying the low score that was published was from his first attempt, and he might have retaken the test and done better. It's kind of fuzzy, but that might be the case.    Either way, my point was that I remember notable pushback against the leaked scores, and their importance. So if certain people are now saying that they didn't care about the S2 scores a year ago, that doesn't sound like revisionist history to me. One of those unnamed execs could be Ballard, who was very vocal about not liking how Stroud was talked about. And we know the Colts subscribe to S2...     Some suggestions... basically unsubstantiated rumors that get repeated enough that they begin to be accepted as fact. Who knows what the Panthers were doing last year, but if they let the S2 test decide which QB to draft, they deserve all the dysfunction they've experienced. I don't think even the Panthers are that lost. More likely, Bryce Young was the guy they decided on, and maybe the higher S2 was in his favor, but would have just been one of several factors that they used.      The way it's described, there's potentially value in the S2 testing. But using Stroud as the example, if you watch him play, and then look at a low S2 score, and can't figure out how to reconcile the disparity between the tape and the test score, then you don't know how to evaluate. Overall, I think way too much is being made of the S2 thing, similar to how way too much was made of Wonderlic scores. It's just one piece of info, and probably carries a small amount of importance overall.    But if a team wants to use S2 testing to prepare a development plan, especially for a QB, there's no real reason they can't have him take the test after the draft. If that's really part of the value, and the player declines the test before the draft because he doesn't want to be scrutinized over it, then ask him to take it once you've drafted him.
    • Ask Philip Rivers to give him advice on parenthood, AR should stick around in the NFL for a while then. 😉
    • Yes, I think so too.
    • It's very telling that nobody actually came out and said that Stroud's published test score was inaccurate. Yes there was pushback about the scores, but they all were very general and non-specific. "I've seen published scores that aren't correct", "Those scores miss a lot of context", etc.    And especially when Stroud himself was asked about those scores. Do you remember what his answer was? He didn't dispute any of it. He just said he's not a test-taker, he's a football player.    I think several big time reporters/analysts reported it. I think I first heard it from Zierlein. But can't find the original. Here's Pelissero reporting on it too: https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-draft-pro-execs-scouts-coaches-rank-and-evaluate-the-qb-class           There have been some suggestions that the Panthers took Bryce Young over Stroud partially because of the S2 test, because they valued it highly.    Yeah, I don't remember if it was reported as players refusing it or their agents not allowing them to take it, but this is what one of the podcasts I listen to reported. Not 100% sure which one it is because I consume a lot of those draft podcasts.    They probably can... not sure if the players would do it. But if the teams knew it in advance they might have better idea of whether development in certain areas is even possible. 
    • I don't think I agree that it's revisionist. Last year, some scores leaked, and then Stroud's scores got aggregated and the story was sensationalized. But all along, there was pushback about the scores -- were they accurate, was there missing context, was there an incomplete leak designed to make people discount Stroud, was someone trying to gain leverage for a trade, etc. There was skepticism from reputable people, and even though it was noted that many teams value the S2 test, I don't think anyone ever expected or predicted that Stroud's draft stock was significantly affected by whatever his score was.    I don't remember reading that he took the test multiple times. That's an interesting variable, if it's true.   There can be value in the test, but like with any other piece of information, how do you apply what's learned to your evaluation process? Like you said, there's a lot of work to figure out how this testing correlates to a player's ability to perform in the NFL, same as with any other datapoint. I don't know if it should be dismissed, but I don't think any team is letting S2 scores rule over their scouting process. Not even for QBs.    I haven't heard that any QBs are refusing to take the test, but I have read that agents are recommending that they don't. I think that's alarmist; Stroud went #2, which is basically what most people expected. Is it established that the scores hurt him? I'd say they did not. But I might not want a player I represent to be subjected to the media/Internet scrutiny, especially since it's clear that players pay attention to what's being said about them, and sometimes react to it.   To the bolded, if a team wants to use S2 results for planning, why can't they draft their QB, and then ask him to take the test? Now there's no pressure, he can test under controlled circumstances, and the team can use the data to help develop their player. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...