Restinpeacesweetchloe Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshinator Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 19 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said: I know the name, don't know as much about him as I probably should. Never hurts to add depth though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boiler_Colt Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 Earned a lot of praise at the Senior Bowl. Being talked about as a top 100 guy with comps to Shaq Mason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJpalmbeacher2 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 I'd prefer a good OT rather than a J.A.G at DT 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCurtis Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 42 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said: I'd prefer a good OT rather than a J.A.G at DT THIS..... This player seems to be more OG than OT 6' 3" is short for a tackle (maybe short for a guard) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJpalmbeacher2 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 1 hour ago, MikeCurtis said: THIS..... This player seems to be more OG than OT 6' 3" is short for a tackle (maybe short for a guard) How about a 'point' or 'shooting' guard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shasta519 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 2 hours ago, MikeCurtis said: THIS..... This player seems to be more OG than OT 6' 3" is short for a tackle (maybe short for a guard) Agree...not sure I get the interest. Maybe if they hadn't double-dipped on G last year...but this seems like overkill...considering Glow and Nelson are here...and Smith can always kick inside if needed. I have said that I wouldn't mind an OL player at some point...but that player should be a developing OT (and one that can play LT)...not a guy that projects to be a G. Though I guess it depends on where Davis is slotted to go. Anything before the late rounds and it seems a bit much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisticuffs111 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 It wouldn't disappoint me. As much as I get hyped about the draft, I don't think we're gonna be getting any sure starters after our first three picks (if that, if we're lucky). So why not possibly bolster the OL with solid depth? Not to mention, as much as I liked Glow, it was his first solid year in the league after underwhelming in Seattle. Not to mention, I'm not exactly sold on our OL depth as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCurtis Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 You almost have to count on an OL pick as one of the first 4 picks Im guessing the 3rd round A OT to develop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now