Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

If we had ......?


Bdg57

Recommended Posts

Hidden

The new QuarterBack Rating has:

Last season: 1. Brady (76.0) 2. Manning (67.something)

Last 3 seasons: 1. Manning (77.something) 2. Brady (67.something)

Note: this is not a Brady vs Mannig thread. Brees,Rogers,rivers finish the top 5.

I personally like this new rating system, only thing I think shouldn't really be included is QB rushing. To me a true QB is you either hand it off or pass it.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Hidden

manning 77.2

Brady 69.something. i think, didnt totally catch it.

Brees

Rivers

Rodgers 67.3

even with his interception filled 2010 season.... wow. thats cool. anyone not watching espn should turn it on now. they are gonna talk manning brady with these numbers.

Link to comment
Hidden

manning 77.2

Brady 69.something. i think, didnt totally catch it.

Brees

Rivers

Rodgers 67.3

even with his interception filled 2010 season.... wow. thats cool. anyone not watching espn should turn it on now. they are gonna talk manning brady with these numbers.

lmao. We all posted three of the same topics at once. Winning! =)

Link to comment
Guest BlueShoe
Hidden

The new QuarterBack Rating has:

Last season: 1. Brady 2. Manning

Last 3 seasons: 1. Manning 2. Brady

I personally like this new rating system, only thing I think shouldn't really be included is QB rushing. To me a true QB is you either hand it off or pass it.

Thoughts?

I love the new system! It's long overdue.

Props to ESPN for putting thousands of video plays together and making this system.

I am really going to enjoy seeing how QB's stack up each week after the games this season with this new rating system.

Link to comment
Hidden

this stat includes

consequence of play (i.e. hail mary picked at end of half doesnt matter. play that sets up 1 and goal at the 1 is HUGE)

yards after catch doesnt count towards qb

importance of situations

fumbles and sacks as negatives, not just INT's

Rushing helps rating

other things i cant remember off the top of my head.

i love this stat.... proves everything we have been arguing for years.

Link to comment
Hidden

this stat includes

consequence of play (i.e. hail mary picked at end of half doesnt matter. play that sets up 1 and goal at the 1 is HUGE)

yards after catch doesnt count towards qb

importance of situations

fumbles and sacks as negatives, not just INT's

Rushing helps rating

other things i cant remember off the top of my head.

i love this stat.... proves everything we have been arguing for years.

I wish it accounted for delay of game penalties and intentional grounding...but oh well nothing is perfect.

Link to comment

If Belichick coached in Indy in place of Dungy/Caldwell, we would have won many Super Bowls. Belichick and Peyton have insanely high football IQs. They could have won multiple Super Bowls, more than the Pats won in the 2000s in my opinion. Pats fans, please don't hurt me :hide:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Belichick coached in Indy in place of Dungy/Caldwell, we would have won many Super Bowls. Belichick and Peyton have insanely high football IQs. They could have won multiple Super Bowls, more than the Pats won in the 2000s in my opinion. Pats fans, please don't hurt me :hide:

id honestly say 5 AT LEAST with the * lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends how many cameramen were on the payroll.

And I guess how good they were at keeping their mouths shut.

And don't forget all the money saved on outfitting the coach. 1 "hoodie" per year at about $50. (maybe cheaper if you can order them with the sleeves hacked off)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats shouldn't have been in the Super Bowl following the Tuck Rule game and an * kicker on the Panthers is the only reason they won another. So I'd Say 1 SB or less because Biilacheat would not have done as good a job keeping the nucleus of this team together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm very interested in Carlie's as well.  I'm just not sold on our starting LB core.
    • I also forgot to say I think Buffalo will also have a down year. 
    • Yeah North.....maybe I got confused about the Pittsburgh Pirates playing in the central.  But I think before realignment there were only 3 divisions, I think.. Like the Colts and Dolphins played in the East, the Raiders and Broncos played in the West and the Steelers and Brownies played in the Central.  But yeah my mistake the Steelers currently in the North division. 
    • I just wanted to give Pitt some love for his recent comments about Indy and family values. I also loved what he said about focusing on the long term financially and considering the situation youre in. He appreciates his place in the organization and that speaks volumes about him as a man. The Texans can have guys like Diggs, Im happy with Pitt. Just a top notch dude.    This is a place a lot of people love to hate on, for some reason. But he is living proof that all this rhetoric about how "nobody wants to live in Indiana" is just bonafied baloney. So many former players stick around here after retirement. There is a reason for that.    He is the exact kind of person you would think wouldnt like it here. Rich california kid whose father played in the NFL. Lives on a little farm in Indiana with his wife, who is also from California. And they both love it here.    Those huge cities are very over rated and it isnt for everyone. We just have to find people like Pitt who do and allow them to become pillars of the franchise. 
    • "I think he flashed last year and can add some value to the LB room."  And I also responded directly to the LB room question. I will simplify, he has a looooow ceiling.   So what's the Problem, why argue?  
  • Members

    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,500

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 10

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,005

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,953

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...