stitches Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Take with a pinch of salt, but Matt Miller had inside info on our Ryan Kelly pick about a week before the draft. Maybe his source has been purged from the Colts after Ballard took over. I will be listening to his podcast with justification on the pick and report back if it's based on anything he's hearing or just his hunch. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defjamz26 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 As he should. The phrase “generational guard” doesn’t mean much. A good guard is a good guard. I’d rather take one in the 2nd. Give me Edmunds or Smith if Chubb is gone. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananabucket Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard pallo Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Edmonds in front of Smith and Nelson? I don't think so. And someone will trade up for Rosen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BProland85 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 I’d take Nelson or trade down in that scenario. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisticuffs111 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 If we take Edmunds over Smith then we've either done a good job smokescreening or some people have bad sources/info on us. But agreed with OP, it'll be interesting to see if he's making this pick based on speculation or info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerColt Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 If Nelson is available at 6 you run to the podium. The only other possible pick at 6 is Smith but he could be had via trade down to 8 or so (not out of top ten) Edmunds has a ton of potential but you don't draft a guy early in the first on potential. I will refer you to TJ Green in the second when we could have drafted Whitehair. Joseph 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 15 minutes ago, cjrichard said: If Nelson is available at 6 you run to the podium. The only other possible pick at 6 is Smith but he could be had via trade down to 8 or so (not out of top ten) Edmunds has a ton of potential but you don't draft a guy early in the first on potential. I will refer you to TJ Green in the second when we could have drafted Whitehair. Joseph Unlike green edmonds is a beast. You take him over smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finball Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Not sure if I'm willing to buy that Rosen isn't going in the top 10.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SP_21 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 14 minutes ago, Finball said: Not sure if I'm willing to buy that Rosen isn't going in the top 10.. The best QB in the draft falling out of the top 5 is highly unlikely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCurtis Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 1 hour ago, cjrichard said: If Nelson is available at 6 you run to the podium. The only other possible pick at 6 is Smith but he could be had via trade down to 8 or so (not out of top ten) Edmunds has a ton of potential but you don't draft a guy early in the first on potential. I will refer you to TJ Green in the second when we could have drafted Whitehair. Joseph I am not sure that is a 100% valid comparison TJ Green was a 76th ranked prospect (3rd round).... we picked him in round 2 ...... But, our head draft guy, thought he knew prospects... turned out... he didnt MANY NFL draft rankings have Edmunds as a top 6 overall prospect NFL.COM, has Edmunds as the 4th best ranked OVERALL pick MOST NFL mock drafts have him going in the top 10 (Some to the Colts) Edmunds isnt a suprise to the NFL scouts...... Who knows what the Colts will do? (I dont) If we get a chance to choose, Chubb that would seem to be a safe pick, but I think he is gone I do think that Edmunds MAY be our pick, and I would be happy with that pick..... we are not "over drafting" the kid We are picking him, right in the area (within 2-3 picks) where he is "slotted" to go by the "experts" However...... If the stars line up, and Buffalo offers the 2 picks in the first..... I grab them and take the best players available If the stars line up and Miami offers 2 firsts and a second........ I grab them..... and take the best player(s) available If the stars line up and Arizona offers up 2 firsts, and 2 seconds...... I grab them and take the best players available These trades, IF we draft well, builds a better, long term team. There have been SO many "cant miss" prospects..... that MISS...... If I have a shot to add many more picks in the "good rounds" my odds are better of picking multiple winners It will be an interesting few days 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoose Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 The concern about Edmunds is you are speculating about his future. He’s a risk. The tape doesn’t justify the pick, but, oh, the possibilities..... The sure things are Nelson and Barkley. I have a very difficult time seeing Edmunds taken over either of these two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCurtis Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 The reality is...... EVERY pick is speculation, and every pick is a risk....... there is no sure thing, not absolutly I have heard the "cant miss" in every draft........... I have blathered on incessentley about pick value of a guard at 6 (So much I am even boring myself) It will be an interesting 12 days............ I hope our dear leader picks us some good'ns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoose Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 True. In the purest sense, you never know until they hit the field and play as to whether you got a good one or not. But stellar play against top notch competition in college is a good barometer. The tape tells you a lot. And both Nelson and Chubb’s body of work speaks volumes. Edmunds not as much. Thus the hope that he can be coached up to reach his terrific potential. But it’s a reach while Chubb and especially Nelson are much closer to sure things. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCurtis Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 4 minutes ago, Hoose said: True. In the purest sense, you never know until they hit the field and play as to whether you got a good one or not. But stellar play against top notch competition in college is a good barometer. The tape tells you a lot. And both Nelson and Chubb’s body of work speaks volumes. Edmunds not as much. Thus the hope that he can be coached up to reach his terrific potential. But it’s a reach while Chubb and especially Nelson are much closer to sure things. I understand what you are saying I am a fan of Chubb, and would be very happy with him as well. I am also a fan of Nelson, as we need a guard (I am just looking for it in 2nd round) There is some amazing tape on Edmunds Some of the evaluations on him is to be patient...... when he does this, the tape is very good When he charges in, he misses On the surface, it seems like a litle bit of coaching He seems like an intelligent kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stitches Posted April 16, 2018 Author Share Posted April 16, 2018 Seems like it was just speculation. They actually had Bradley Chubb fall to the Colts in their mock and they took him for the Colts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lollygagger8 Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 Nelson > Edmunds 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now