What If We See A Different Colts Team vs. The Cards?

[GwinnettColt]

My concerns about the defense are 1) DB play.  The pass was a wide-open option to the Rams last week.   2) The front seven looked pretty good until they got exhausted from being on the field too long, which would be improved immediately by the offense being able to get first downs.

 

Offensive concerns are the 1) O-line.   2) Who they will actually start at QB.  I've heard that Brissett is named the starter and I've heard that the decision has not been made yet.   I hope it's the former.  3) General play calling and coaching...The Mack "touchdown" should have been challenged.  

 

 

[oldunclemark]

 

   We will see the same team (No Luck. No. Vontae. No. Kelly...a few others who will watch in street clothes) but the game will be almost surely closer because we wont give 16 points to the other side with turnovers

Edited September 16, 2017 by oldunclemark

[Albaby]

On 9/15/2017 at 7:41 AM, J@son said:

 

you'd keep using common phrases incorrectly?

And you'd keep commenting on them.  In your own self righteous way.  Thank you for reminding me that everything can and will be scrutinized by people who feel they need the last word.

[Jason_]

1 hour ago, Albaby said:

And you'd keep commenting on them.  In your own self righteous way.  Thank you for reminding me that everything can and will be scrutinized by people who feel they need the last word.

 

Youre welcome. 

[OLD FAN MAN]

On 9/12/2017 at 3:03 PM, King Colt said:

The media is burying the Colts this week after their incineration last week. I agree with most of it but ESPN just had the power rankings for week one and one of the three persons reviewing it said the Colts at 31 should switch places with the Jets at 32. Whatever, did they really need to go there? What if the Colts actually won this coming weekend (assuming we will see some kind of difference)? I am anxious to hear what Ballard has to say now, this week and how the media will change it's slant on the Colts as we all know ESPN refuses to admit doing/saying anything wrong ever. David Johnson their star RB is out for a couple months.

imo we wont as bad as last week, we may not win but we will compete

[azcolt]

I think we will see a different Colts team tomorrow. Just when I was starting to learn all of the names of the team from last week.

[Chucklez]

5 hours ago, J@son said:

 

Youre welcome. 

You're*

[2006Coltsbestever]

9 minutes ago, Chucklez said:

You're*

What's worse, when people say Your instead of You are or Looser instead of Loser. It drives me nuts when someone says someone is a looser  

[Yoshinator]

29 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

What's worse, when people say Your instead of You are or Looser instead of Loser. It drives me nuts when someone says someone is a looser  

Yep, there must of been some fad that called someone a looser, and now people can't even differentiate the spelling of that and the correct one of "loser", lol. 

[2006Coltsbestever]

7 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Yep, there must of been some fad that called someone a looser, and now people can't even differentiate the spelling of that and the correct one of "loser", lol. 

I am not the spelling POlice but that does drive me nuts for some reason.  

[Yoshinator]

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not the spelling POlice but that does drive me nuts for some reason.  

The one that drives me crazy is when people spell ridiculous like rediculous. There's no E in ridiculous! The loser/looser is something that has come up in the last few years. Looser is a word, but it's sure not supposed to be used in the way people use it today! Might be a product of the school system.

[OLD FAN MAN]

i hope

[Jason_]

6 hours ago, Chucklez said:

You're*

 

Hey, the apostrophe was missing but it was still the correct usage lol

[Jason_]

5 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

The one that drives me crazy is when people spell ridiculous like rediculous. There's no E in ridiculous! The loser/looser is something that has come up in the last few years. Looser is a word, but it's sure not supposed to be used in the way people use it today! Might be a product of the school system.

 

Since we're on the subject, the one that probably gets me the most is are instead of our. "This is are country"  SMH 

 

Lol

[Dark Superman]

The only difference is that Cardinals might beat us by 80.