Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

According to PFF, Colts have the worst backfield in the league


colt18

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

How relevant is Frank Gore's 40 times from 2005?

 

I'm not saying we should never block down field. I'm saying that faster and more elusive backs are better able to make defenders miss, and they're better able to run away from defenders in the second level. 

 

This play isn't about downfield blocking. It's about Gore's ability to make a defender miss in the second level, and then having the speed to outrun everyone to the end zone. 

frankgorerun.gif

 

On this play, he got downfield blocking, but it only mattered after he broke three tackles. 

 

fgbeast.0.gif

 

He'll still break a few tackles a game, but he's not making defenders miss, and he doesn't have that top gear to run away from defenders. He's still an effective back, but he doesn't threaten defenses with speed. You're arguing that elusiveness and speed won't matter, and I don't get that. 

 

Also, we've only really discussed long runs, but speed and elusiveness will matter on shorter runs as well, especially outside the tackles. 

I haven't spoken about Gore's speed in 2005?  But, if you look at the 50+ pass play last year against the Titans, Gore showed he's faster than #54 Avery Williamson (4.66) and sufficiently fast to keep #25 Rashad Johnson (4.53) from making a play over 50+ yards.

 

I've never said a fast runner cannot make big plays.  In fact, my last post points to McCoy and Elliott both making those plays, but slower guys make big plays too which highlights the importance of downfield blocking.  For guys like Jeremy Hill there are typically 7 defensive players as fast or faster than him on the field.  He needs blocking to get big runs.

 

BTW, that last video is all about Gore's power running and blocking.  He showed no elusiveness...just a refusal to go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/28/2017 at 6:15 PM, Superman said:

 

How relevant is Frank Gore's 40 times from 2005?

 

I'm not saying we should never block down field. I'm saying that faster and more elusive backs are better able to make defenders miss, and they're better able to run away from defenders in the second level. 

 

This play isn't about downfield blocking. It's about Gore's ability to make a defender miss in the second level, and then having the speed to outrun everyone to the end zone. 

frankgorerun.gif

 

On this play, he got downfield blocking, but it only mattered after he broke three tackles. 

 

fgbeast.0.gif

 

He'll still break a few tackles a game, but he's not making defenders miss, and he doesn't have that top gear to run away from defenders. He's still an effective back, but he doesn't threaten defenses with speed. You're arguing that elusiveness and speed won't matter, and I don't get that. 

 

Also, we've only really discussed long runs, but speed and elusiveness will matter on shorter runs as well, especially outside the tackles. 

Seems you 2 are going around in circles.   You are both right and both wrong.   Speed and elusiveness IS important, but works even better with down field blocking.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Myles said:

Seems you 2 are going around in circles.   You are both right and both wrong.   Speed and elusiveness IS important, but works even better with down field blocking.  

I've never said speed or elusiveness is not valuable, but when 4 of your top 7 big play RBs last year are neither "fast" nor elusive, you have to question why the Colts RBs did not have any big running plays last year. The convenient, non-insightful response is something like, "last year it was more like Frank the Tricycle than Frank the Tank," or "Frank's lost it" or "Turbin is a short yardage back."  Those types of trite posts ignore that guys like Jeremy Hill (who is a near 4.7 40) had 3 40+ yard runs last year, and only 4.6 40 Ajayi had more.  Lots of pedestrian backs are racking up long runs, so why haven't the Colts?  IMO, it's a lack of downfield blocking which is painfully obvious when you look at video.  Sure, it would be great to have a fast back AND great downfield blocking--yould get years like DeMarco Murray had with Dallas in 2014, but even with guys like Gore and Turbin in the backfield, the Colts should be able to get a few big runs if they provide blocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Myles said:

Seems you 2 are going around in circles.   You are both right and both wrong.   Speed and elusiveness IS important, but works even better with down field blocking.  

 

1 hour ago, A8bil said:

I've never said speed or elusiveness is not valuable, but when 4 of your top 7 big play RBs last year are neither "fast" nor elusive, you have to question why the Colts RBs did not have any big running plays last year. The convenient, non-insightful response is something like, "last year it was more like Frank the Tricycle than Frank the Tank," or "Frank's lost it" or "Turbin is a short yardage back."  Those types of trite posts ignore that guys like Jeremy Hill (who is a near 4.7 40) had 3 40+ yard runs last year, and only 4.6 40 Ajayi had more.  Lots of pedestrian backs are racking up long runs, so why haven't the Colts?  IMO, it's a lack of downfield blocking which is painfully obvious when you look at video.  Sure, it would be great to have a fast back AND great downfield blocking--yould get years like DeMarco Murray had with Dallas in 2014, but even with guys like Gore and Turbin in the backfield, the Colts should be able to get a few big runs if they provide blocking.

 

I've never said that downfield blocking isn't important.

 

A8bil is choosing to focus on downfield blocking as the primary reason we don't have more big carries, and I disagree. I think the primary reason is the lack of speed from the backs -- particularly having burst in the open field and being able to turn the corner. Every big running play doesn't require downfield blocking, as the gif above shows.

 

And here's Jeremy Hill's 62 yarder from last year, which wasn't about downfield blocking at all. https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/4FdY_nttRo5c77AerO2O_di5Hbc=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2463294/hill-62-yard.0.gif (Again, this doesn't mean downfield blocking isn't important.)

 

Also, I really disagree with the focus on 40 times to determine whether or not a back is 'fast enough' to break a big play. I've never said any of that garbage in bold up above.

 

I think we'd all agree that better downfield blocking combined with more speed in the open field would produce more explosive running plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Also, I really disagree with the focus on 40 times to determine whether or not a back is 'fast enough' to break a big play. I've never said any of that garbage in bold up above.

 

I think we'd all agree that better downfield blocking combined with more speed in the open field would produce more explosive running plays. 

To be clear...I never attributed those quotes to you...you've been very measured in this discussion and you've done a good job of making your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things:

1. Nobody ever gives Gore enough respect. He's already talking about playing in 2018. When he loses it, he'll quit. He hasn't yet!

2. Even with a great blocking, touchdown producing Turbin along with some youngsters the critics just don't see it.

With an improved line they'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying he is about to be a sack machine but you can see some of his potential as a one gap penetrator with that frame.    
    • Davis came from Alabama. My point of interest as the writer highlighted is he is moving from being a 2 gapper into now only being responsible for a single gap with a lot more penetration from him versus read and react. With his length and power at 6ft 7 300 plus the expectation for him in our scheme is he will be more disruptive. A much more reliable option for us if Grover goes down in addition to whatever else maybe we can do with him.
    • Thank you. You guys are too kind, but I truly appreciate the support.    Perhaps I am being too hard on myself… But my point still stands that anyone who makes it to the NFL, whether practice squad or starter, has achieved something prestigious that only a rare few ever achieve.    Over a million high schoolers play. Of those only 7.8 percent move on to play in college.    Over 80,000 people play in college. Only 0.4 percent make it to opening day in the NFL.    Only 2,016 players make it to NFL rosters. 
    • Davis had a very good rookie season after being drafted in the 2nd round out of Ohio State (I believe).   Graded in the 70’s against both the run and pass.      But his last three years have been disappointing, as he’s graded in the mid-50’s.   The reason I’m so interested in this signing, is (A) I’m sure it was heavily influenced by the new DL coach, Partridge.   And (B) we’re paying him 2/14.  I don’t recall that kind of money ever being given to a basic backup before.   Don’t think Davis is here to push Stewart, the Colts just signed him to 3/39.  That tells me the Colts defensive staff sees him differently.   I don’t know what the plan the staff has come up with for Davis, but I’m looking forward to watching it play out. 
  • Members

    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...