Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Will Seahawks be dynasty if they win SB?

amfootball

By amfootball
in NFL General

 Share

Recommended Posts

Qwiz Practice Squad

Qwiz

Posted
Posted

They will have gone through Manning (though that's not saying much in the postseason) and Brady in consecutive years. They are going to be paying Wilson, but Carroll did a superb job finding defensive players for cheap before, so who says he can't strike again? I don't think I would say dynasty yet, unless they manage to make it to the Super Bowl in 2016 as well. Then we can talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OffensivelyPC Active Roster

OffensivelyPC

Posted
Posted

Wilson being praised for a 4 int game because of 1 throw in OT is a bit amusing though

I never understood that one myself, either.  I've heard/seen a few talking heads talk about how he makes the great throws under pressure.  As a general statement, fine.  But you have to be on PCP if you're going to make that statement in reference to the Green Bay game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RandomFan Walk On

RandomFan

Posted
Posted

Seahawks won the SB already. No need to even play the game. NFL won't let pats win because of thier cheating ways!!

 

You make the NFL sound fixed. If I truly thought it was fixed I couldn't watch it anymore.....Also, the patriots haven't been caught cheating. Somehow people take "investigation" as "guilty". There's a very good chance the patriots come out of this innocent. I base this off belichicks press conference and science. Science backs up the theory that this could all very well have been a gigantic waste of time.......Well, I think it already is regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BloodyChamp Walk On

BloodyChamp

Posted
Posted

you mean his 395 yds and 2 td in Seattle where the defense gave up a last minute TD to lose by 1?

I thought the Pats won that one my bad...still a good example though. Brady put up 23 and led in the 4th even though he threw 2 ints.

And if that example doesn't cut it, then I just go back to my first comment about Wilson, Favre, etc. I looked the game up. Wilson had fewer completions, fewer yards, and more sacks. He still won the game.

It can't be both. He can't win the game and suck because of stats while Brady loses but is perfect because of stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southwest1 Walk On

southwest1

Posted
Posted

Yes they did. They made more plays and scored more points than green bay. Style points are for losers.

Did Seattle win? Yes. Did GB collapse in the last 5 minutes? Yes. Are most QBs who throw 4 picks gonna win the NFC Championship Game. Absolutely not. What in the world does style points have to do with anything? 

 

Lynch saved Wilson's caboose in that game. Don't kid yourself man. Please don't infer that the Hawks played better than the Packers. They didn't. Seattle just got lucky. Plain & simple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RandomFan Walk On

RandomFan

Posted
Posted

Did Seattle win? Yes. Did GB collapse in the last 5 minutes? Yes. Are most QBs who throw 4 picks gonna win the NFC Championship Game. Absolutely not. What in the world does style points have to do with anything? 

 

Lynch saved Wilson's caboose in that game. Don't kid yourself man. Please don't infer that the Hawks played better than the Packers. They didn't. Seattle just got lucky. Plain & simple. 

 

Sometimes its better to be lucky than good. The only thing that matters is seattle made more plays when it mattered than the packers and they won. Yeah, the packers played better for most of the game, so what? They didn't play well when it came time to close it out.. And they lost. Plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OffensivelyPC Active Roster

OffensivelyPC

Posted
Posted

Back to Back Championships may not be a dynasty but Back to Back is still Back to Back.

well of course. It's an amazing achievement not many teams can say they've done. So if, in describing the difference between a dynasty and "only" back to back chamionships, I don't in any way try to diminish either achievement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JerodMayo51 Walk On

JerodMayo51

Posted
Posted

Did Seattle win? Yes. Did GB collapse in the last 5 minutes? Yes. Are most QBs who throw 4 picks gonna win the NFC Championship Game. Absolutely not. What in the world does style points have to do with anything? 

 

Lynch saved Wilson's caboose in that game. Don't kid yourself man. Please don't infer that the Hawks played better than the Packers. They didn't. Seattle just got lucky. Plain & simple. 

 

I'm pretty indifferent when it comes to Wilson, but it's been pretty annoying seeing how much praise people have been lavishing him with after having what would be considered a horrendous game in most circles.

 

Some of the plays that they made in that game, they were like 1 in 500 type plays and they managed to string a bunch of them together for a win.  Pretty unreal, and hey hats off to them for getting lucky enough to do that, but they definitely liked out and I think the fact that they won had more to do with GB giving the game away than the Seahawks taking it from them.

 

A win is a win though

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southwest1 Walk On

southwest1

Posted
Posted

Sometimes its better to be lucky than good. The only thing that matters is seattle made more plays when it mattered than the packers and they won. Yeah, the packers played better for most of the game, so what? They didn't play well when it came time to close it out.. And they lost. Plain and simple.

I'm not disputing that the Seahawks won the NFC Championship Game & yes they deserve to be playing in the SB. No argument there, but the odds of recovering that onside kick & winning that game are like a billion to 1.

 

Yes, I am aware that INDY lost a SB to New Orleans in 2009 due to the same circumstance, but it's pretty rare. Like you said, "It's better to be lucky than good" once in awhile RF. I just can't give QB RW universal praise for an astronomical comeback because without that onside kick recovery RW has no shot at winning that Championship Game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southwest1 Walk On

southwest1

Posted
Posted

I'm pretty indifferent when it comes to Wilson, but it's been pretty annoying seeing how much praise people have been lavishing him with after having what would be considered a horrendous game in most circles.

 

Some of the plays that they made in that game, they were like 1 in 500 type plays and they managed to string a bunch of them together for a win.  Pretty unreal, and hey hats off to them for getting lucky enough to do that, but they definitely liked out and I think the fact that they won had more to do with GB giving the game away than the Seahawks taking it from them.

 

A win is a win though

It won't matter anyway because your Patriots are still winning the SB tomorrow. There will be no lopsided Pacific NW victory this time by the middle of the 3rd QTR JM51 my friend.

 

Brady's got this one.  :flyingelvis:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Solid84
      Colts Select Laiatu Latu Edge UCLA

      By Solid84 · Posted

      Yeah, Ebukam almost looks clumsy next to Latu. He's just so fluid.
    • Chucklez
      How many games will the Colts win in 2024?

      By Chucklez · Posted

      Did Hou actually get that much better? This really does remain to be seen. I am of the opinion that the signing of Diggs is a signing that has been made about 2 years too late. He won't be bad, but he isn't a top 10 WR in the NFL anymore. I wouldn't put him as any more dangerous that Pittman, so WR's are a push. We have the better RB, Mixon is great and all, but he is not JT. We have the better Oline, and it isn't even close. TE's are a push, we have a lot of upside, but until it is realised im very "meh" on our TEs. QB - I would argue that Stroud is probably more likely to regress to the mean in year 2 vs improve. That rookie season of his was a bit silly, and they had an easier schedule last season too. If he really does build on last year and get even better, then our entire discourse here is probably irrelevant as we will have another Mahomes level QB on our hands to deal with in the AFC and within the AFC South no less. So unless Richardson is also a Mahomes level talent in that scenario, we are done for anyways. To me, our success in this coming season comes down to 2 groups on this entire team. 1. The QB (because... duh) 2. Our DBs. If we even get average play from the DBs, I think this team has the ability to win the whole damned thing (supposing Richardson stays healthy and is what we all hope he is). I would also argue that Houston are paper thin. If they lose a OL starter, Mixon or even one of their starting WRs.... they have a very big drop off. And injuries happen in the NFL. Just sayin...
    • NewColtsFan
      What about Leonard at safety?

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      If he wasn’t fast enough or athletic enough anymore for linebacker, then he’s not going to be able to cut it at Safety where speed , quickness, athleticism are even more important.    Wish it wasn’t so…. 
    • OLD FAN MAN
      What about Leonard at safety?

      By OLD FAN MAN · Posted

      could he be another bob sanders at that position?
    • DynaMike
      What about Leonard at safety?

      By DynaMike · Posted

      Man I love me some Maniac, but it won't happen, and he's too slow after his surgeries. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...